1. Workshop evaluations April – September 2014

2. Considerations 25% of participants gave their role as ‘other’, moving forward we need to record the detail behind this Some registered partners are delivering workshops to a high proportion of coaches (88% of attendees in some instances), we therefore need to reinforce the target audience to these partners. However, overall there was a 17% decrease in the number of coaches attending workshops in quarter 2, compared to quarter 1 and a 13% increase in both the number of care workers and those stating their role as ‘other’ in quarter 2. Email / newsletter was the most common way for participants to hear about the training. As a result we need to support registered partners with email and newsletter content and help them to maximise promotion through other channels. Proving information about local opportunities is the weakest area in the evaluation (received the most negative responses in all related questions), therefore we need to support registered partners and tutors more with this. For all questions relating to what was learnt at the workshop, parents and guardians gave the most negative responses. Project group to look how best to support tailoring of the workshop to specific audiences.

3. Demographics Most common number of disabled people participants currently work with / support 1-5 people 41% of participants Job role Frequency of provision

4. Role type by registered partner CSPCoachVolunteerCare worker Community Sport Provider LeaderParent / guardian Other Active Devon0%36%9%45%9%0% Active Essex38%13% 0% 25% County Durham Sport33%20%7%20%0% 20% CSW Sport11%0%67%11%0% 11% Derbyshire88%0% 13%0% Energize0% 71%29% EFDS (APCP)7%0%7%0% 86% GreaterSport33%11%0%22%11%0%22% Kent Sport18%36%0%9%18%0%18% Lincolnshire Sport27% 0%27%18%0%

5. CSPCoachVolunteerCare worker Community Sport Provider LeaderParent / guardian Other Living Sport25%50%0% 25%0% Northamptonshire26%0%53%16%5%0% North Yorkshire Sport0%12%35%18%6% 24% Nottinghamshire50%0% 50%0% Oxfordshire Sport40%0% 20%0%20% Staffordshire & S-O-T44%0%31%6%0%6%13% Wesport35%50%0% 15% Tyne & Wear Sport40%30%20%0% 10% YMCA20%47%0%13% 0%7% Role type by registered partner continued

6. How participants found out about the training

7. Confidence, skills and knowledge in the inclusion of disabled people in sport and physical activity The number of participants who rated their confidence, skills and knowledge as good or excellent increased by 55% after the workshop

8. About the workshop continued Overall rating of the workshop out of 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest

9. Resources The workbook provided will be useful

10. Resources continued CSPStrongly AgreeAgreeDon’t knowDisagreeStrongly Disagree Active Devon50% 0% Active Essex44% 12%0% County Durham Sport25%75%0% CSW Sport50% 0% Derbyshire38% 25%0% Energize25%75%0% EFDS (APCP)20%47%6%27%0% GreaterSport55%45%0% Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t KnowDisagreeStrongly Disagree Provided information about local opportunities available 40%44%6%8%2%

11. Resources continued CSPStrongly AgreeAgreeDon’t knowDisagreeStrongly Disagree Kent Sport67%33%0% Lincolnshire Sport64%18% 0% Living Sport33% 0%33%0% Northamptonshire61%39%0% North Yorkshire Sport44%50%6%0% Nottinghamshire40%60%0% Oxfordshire Sport17%67%17%0% Staffordshire & S-O-T12%41%12%18% Wesport69%27%0%4%0% Tyne & Wear Sport33%66%0% YMCA36%21%29%7%

12. The tutor Had a good knowledge of the subject matter Engaged well with the group

13. The tutor continued The tutors overall performance was good

14. What attendees learnt Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t KnowDisagreeStrongly Disagree I learnt about practical ways to support inclusive delivery 68%30%0%1%0% Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t knowDisagreeStrongly Disagree Care worker62%38%0% Coach67%33%0% Community Sport Provider 78%18%4%0% Leader78%22%0% Parent / guardian13%75%0%13%0% Volunteer81%20%0% Other72%27%0%2%0%

15. What attendees learnt continued Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t KnowDisagreeStrongly Disagree I learnt about local opportunities for myself and the people I work with / support 41%45%4%9%1% Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t knowDisagreeStrongly Disagree Care worker49%34%3%11%3% Coach39%49%7%5%0% Community Sport Provider 50%39%8%4%0% Leader63%38%0% Parent / guardian14%71%14%0% Volunteer59%29%5%7%0% Other28%53%0%16%3%

16. What attendees learnt continued Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t KnowDisagreeStrongly Disagree I got new ideas / strategies that I could apply immediately in my role 58%41%0%1%0% Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t knowDisagreeStrongly Disagree Care worker43%57%0% Coach58%40%0%2%0% Community Sport Provider 67%33%0% Leader78%22%0% Parent / guardian22%67%0%11%0% Volunteer71%27%0%2%0% Other57%43%0%

17. What attendees learnt continued Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t KnowDisagreeStrongly Disagree I feel ready to support disabled people to access sporting opportunities 48% 1%3%0% Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t knowDisagreeStrongly Disagree Care worker44%50%0%6%0% Coach45%53%0%2%0% Community Sport Provider 61%32%7%0% Leader78%22%0% Parent / guardian22%67%0%11%0% Volunteer63%35%0%3%0% Other42%53%0%5%0%

18. What attendees learnt continued Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t KnowDisagreeStrongly Disagree The content of the workshop was tailored to my needs 50%48%0%2%0% Strongly AgreeAgreeDon’t knowDisagreeStrongly Disagree Care worker46%54%0% Coach49%52%0% Community Sport Provider 70%28%0%3%0% Leader56%44%0% Parent / guardian13%75%0%13%0% Volunteer66%32%0% 2% Other37%62%0%2%0%

19. Comparisons between quarter 1 and quarter 2 Q1 (Apr – Jun)Q2 (Jul – Sep) Number of workshops delivered437* Number of participants trained53226* Number of CSPs who delivered workshops 224* % who rated pre-trained confidence as good or excellent 44%34% % who rated post-trained confidence as good or excellent 90%87% % change in good and excellent confidence levels 46%53% * Awaiting confirmation for some workshops

20. Comparisons between quarter 1 and quarter 2 continued RoleQ1 (Apr – Jun)Q2 (Jul – Sep) Care worker3%16% Coach39%22% Community Sport Provider 10%12% Leader6%4% Parent / Guardian3%4% Volunteer26%16% Other13%26%

21. Comparisons between quarter 1 and quarter 2 continued Overall rating of the workshop out of 10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest