Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi, Minato, Tokyo 105-0003 JAPAN Phone (+81) 3-3508-8894 / Fax (+81) 3-3501-1735 E-mail : kurosawa@iae.or.jp Expert Meeting on Assessment of Contributions to Climate Change UK Met Office, Bracknell UK September 25-27, 2002 The views are solely those of the individual author and do not represent organizational view of the Institute of Applied Energy

2 2 Outline [1] GRAPE MODEL AND CLIMATE MODULE [2] PHASE 2 RESULTS GLOBAL SCALE ASSESSMENT AND SENSITIVITY RUNS [3] SUMMARY

3 3 ENERGY CLIMATE IMPACTLAND USE ECONOMY CO2,CH4,N2O (Fossil Fuel) Energy Cost Energy Trade Carbon Trade Biomass Energy Atmospheric Temperature Landuse Related Cost Food Trade Carbon(Deforestation) CH4(Livestock,Rice) N2O(Fertilizer),etc [1] GRAPE MODEL AND CLIMATE MODULE

4 4 CLIMATE CHANGE CO 2 Em. Ocean CH 4 Em. N 2 O Conc. CH 4 Conc. CO 2 Conc. Atmosphere N 2 O Em. Rice Field Other GHGs Em. Forest Fos.Fuel Consumption Chemical Industry Fertilized Soil Livestock Fos. Fuel Production Concentration → Rad. Forc. Emissions Rad. Forcing Temperature Sources

5 5 [2] PHASE 2 RESULTS GLOBAL SCALE ASSESSMENT AND SENSITIVITY RUNS # Formulation Emissions to Concentrations CO2 - Four Box model CH4,N2O – One Box model Concentrations to Rad. Forcings IPCC WGI TAR Rad. Forcings to Temp. Change & SLR Two Box model # Evaluation Period 10 year step

6 6 # Sensitivity Run Past Emissions : EDGAR Future Emissions : IPCC SRES A2 Marker StartEnd Case 118902000 - default Case 219902100 Case 318902100

7 7 # Regional Contibution Assessment Example : Region A Contribution >>> Nature + Region A Emission Start End Definition of Contribution = (change of param. in regional calculation) / (change of param. in global calculation)

8 8 # Cumulative Emissions

9 9 # Concentrations

10 10 # Radiative Forcing

11 11 # Temperature Change

12 12 # Sea Level Rise

13 13 # Strength of Non-Linearity -- Regional sum is not equal to 100%. ParameterPeriod(Reg.Sum) – (Global) CO2 Conc.Past (case 1)-15% Future (case 2)-31% Past+Future(case 3)-3% Rad ForcingPast-14% Future-37% Past+Future25% TempPast5% Future-31% Past+Future25% SLRPast39% Future31% Past+Future30%

14 14 [3] SUMMARY # Strong non-linearity is observed. # Treatment of natural emission? # Historical evaluation start date should be 1760 as default value since this period is considered as the beginning of human interventions.

15 15 Thank you for your kind attention.


Download ppt "1 Results from the GRAPE Model Atsushi KUROSAWA Research and Development Division, The Institute of Applied Energy (IAE) Shinbashi SY bldg., 1-14-2 Nishishinbashi,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google