Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

By: Nathaniel Situ Sang Phung. Our presentation is to outline the similarities and differences in the social structure of Latin American countries. The.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "By: Nathaniel Situ Sang Phung. Our presentation is to outline the similarities and differences in the social structure of Latin American countries. The."— Presentation transcript:

1 By: Nathaniel Situ Sang Phung

2 Our presentation is to outline the similarities and differences in the social structure of Latin American countries. The countries of focus will be Chile, Argentina and Brazil.

3  Chile  Argentina  Brazil

4  Through the 1800’s, the country enjoyed great economic growth.  Between 1825 and 1875 Chile’s external trade went from $7.5million to $74 million.  The ports of Santiago and Valparaiso were linked by railroad.

5  Populations in the “nitrate zone” grew by more than 300 percent.

6  Politically, everything was still very oligarchic.  President Balmaceda.  During the times of political maneuvering.  Any man age 25 or older have the right to vote.

7  The new form of government would open the door for the formation of different political parties:  Radical Party (PR)  Liberal Party (PL)  Democratic Party (PD)  Liberal-Democratic Party (PLD)  Socialist Workers Party (POS)  Socialist Party (PS)  Nationalist Party (PN)

8  The PR’s initial support base originally came from the “urban elite” who had grown tired of the oligarchic stranglehold on Chilean politics.  PR became the center of the political landscape in Chile.  By the end of the century the PR was attracting urban professionals (i.e. teachers, accountants, lawyers etc.)

9  Socioeconomic and demographic shifts that drastically changed their society.  The working class experienced this major growth.  The resulting urbanization boom not only involved the drastic increase in the number of people in the working class but also reorganized the country’s human geography.

10  Buenos Aires  Better Jobs and Pay

11  From the mid 1800’s to the mid 1900’s  Gente Decente [upper class]  Gente de Pueblo [middle class]

12  During this time period the population multiplied seven times the original number of people.  Two main divisions still remained  Possibility to Change?

13  The Man usually was university educated for a profession, the military, or a clerical post. If a man elected not to go to the university he would work, learning the family business which included ranching, banking, and exporting.  The women were usually groomed for domestic duties and did not seek employment.

14  The upper class of society was usually native born and constituted approximately 5% of the population.  The gente de pueblo included all others or approximately 95% of the population.

15  These strata which ranged from the somewhat educated, skilled laborer, marginally skilled, and illiterate were also determined using the same criteria  Children usually remained in the same strata as their parents because their education was very limited, sometimes to the six grades of elementary school and for a few in the lower level, education ended after the first or second grade.

16  Many white- collar workers (i.e. office employees, clerks and bookkeepers) came from the gente de pueblo who had actually been to some secondary school.  A skilled laborer who worked at a trade and possessed his own tools and equipment was usually able to achieve a level of economic independence.

17  A recently arrived immigrant usually was the one who filled the most menial occupation, as they had little or no education.

18  The upper class knew they held “economic and political power over both city and nation.”  It was this social class that produced the business and political leaders as well as the national elite.

19  Brazil’s social structure was very similar with the exception of slavery.  Rio de Janeiro (January River) became the center of Brazilian society.

20  During the time period of the diamond and gold rush Rio became the trade center of Brazil.  Even though Brazil experienced economic benefit from these “booms” there remained a large gap between the social classes.

21  The coffee plantation and mine owners were benefiting from cheap rural labor and slaves, but mostly slaves.  The lives of these slaves were similar and often worse than peasant laborers in other Latin American countries. These slaves were relegated to cramped quarters with terrible sanitation and sub-standard food in addition to physical abuse.

22  Many slaves remained tied to the land as sharecroppers  Former slaves could not leave because of debt and they had no possibility of ever owning any land

23  Migration towards the country side  Thousand of Immigrants from Europe  Race Mixing  The responsibility for social services of these people were, then thrust on civil society rather than the plantation owners

24  As with any city with inadequate infrastructure crime rates rose and living conditions deteriorated in the lower class.  The resulting period of time was one of civil unrest as the wealthy political elites tried to control the lower classes.

25  Chile  Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 2007 ©  Argentina  http://www.argentina.gov.ar/argentina/portal /paginas.dhtml?pagina=1669  Brazil  http://countrystudies.us/brazil/30.htm  http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/brtoc.html


Download ppt "By: Nathaniel Situ Sang Phung. Our presentation is to outline the similarities and differences in the social structure of Latin American countries. The."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google