1. IAA National Conference 5 th July 2013

2. BSH Bradford Secondary Heads Mission: Every child attends a secondary school which is good or better.

3. Structure & Governance Summary o Partnership established as a Company Limited by Guarantee. o 28 participating schools are “Members” – subject to payment of £10k annual subscription. o Membership open to Bradford secondary schools initially. o Members elect three “Directors” to develop and run the Partnership on a two year commitment: Chair, Vice Chair and Chief Executive. Directors must be serving headteachers/principals.

4. Six Objectives for Launch Risk Assessment, Score Card, and Self Evaluation Framework. Common methodology for school evaluation Clarity about success and failure Depersonalise issues Deliver Member entitlement to school review service Two visits a year. Expert external challenge. Focus school support on key areas of need Subject Leaders of Education Teach Bradford & Impact Teachers. Develop data models to identify patterns across Bradford. Existing Provision + Teaching School. TLOD & Future Leaders. Provide leadership development and CPD LA knowledge of its schools. Impact on OFSTED, OSC Establish protocols with key stakeholders

5. Monitoring & Review: Review Process Self Evaluation Annual Review Visit Report Back Develop ment Follow up Visit External HMI, Partnership Operations Director, Principal / Headteacher: agreed in advance vs MockSTED. Immediate verbal feedback followed up with written report and wider publication. Report identifies needs and/or expertise to be shared. Partnership brokers support to meet needs. Follow up visits targeted to specific needs. Collective Analysis of summer results and school completion of SEF

6. One School’s Scorecard Criterion 1 Comparator (see note 1) Very low risk (B)Low risk (G)Moderate risk (A)High risk (R) Student Attainment 5ACEM - most recent results Floor standard 40% National ave 54% (boys 51 girls 58)  15% above NA NA to 15% above NA At or above floor standard. Below NA. Below floor target. MA % C+ passes most recent results 2 NA 66% (boys 67 girls 66) Sig + (note 2)  NA but not sig+ < NA but not sig -Sig - EN % C+ passes most recent results NA 71% (boys 65 girls 77) Sig +  NA but not sig+ < NA but not sig -Sig - % 5+A*-C passes most recent results NA 75% (boys 71 girls 79) Sig +  NA but not sig+ < NA but not sig -Sig - % 5+A*-G inc E/M passes most recent results NA 89% (boys 87 girls 91) >5% above NANA to NA+5%NA-5% to NA>5% below NA Capped APS most recent results NA 327 (boys 316 girls 339) Sig +  NA but not sig+ < NA but not sig -Sig - Trend in attainment – rolling average of last 3 years 3 5ACEM (NA  3%), 5AGEM (NA  0.5%), cAPS (NA  10pts). >NA  *2 (ie improving > double NA rate)  NA  to NA*2 < NA to 0<0 (ie deteriorating) Projected 5ACEM for the coming year Floor target 40% National ave 54% (boys 51 girls 58)  15% above NA NA to 15% above NA At or above floor target. Below NA. Below floor target. Student progress EN L3+ conversions most recent results † 4 Floor standard 72%82% and above72% - 81%62% - 71%Below 62% MA L3+ conversions most recent results † 4 Floor standard 65%75% and above65% - 74%55% - 64%Below 55% Projected outcome for the coming year for the two indicators above Use criteria in two rows above Both blue or blue/green Both green or green/amber Both amberBoth red or red/amber Main groups’ progress most recent results 5 Mostly sig+ No sig. variations Nearly all in line or sig+. No sig variations. Most in line. <= 1 group sig-. >1 sig. group sig-. Years 7-10: % making progress per year towards 3+ levels in E/M Post-16 progress most recent result (eg LAC/ALPs/ALIS)† Top 25% ALPs 3+ Top 50% + ALPs 4/5 Bottom 50% ALPs 6/7 Bottom 25% ALPs 8/9

7. One School’s Scorecard CriterionDateBGARBGARComment Last Ofsted inspection grading Oct 2009 A Capacity rated good Overall Effectiveness Sept 2011 A Three year trend of sustainable improvement now established Student Achievement Students’ progress and learning overall A Quality of learning is now good in the majority of lessons. Progress overall in English and maths remains below national average Students’ communication skills and progress A Rapidly improving, although still below expectations Students’ maths skills and progress R Improving, but still too low Performance of groups & narrowing of gaps with national ave. A In-school variation is similar to national averages. Gaps are closing with the national average Final year leavers’ attainment R Attainment remains significantly below national averages Achievement of SEN/D students G This is improving rapidly Overall grade for AchievementA Behaviour and Safety Students’ attitudes to learning and behaviour A Students are positive about learning. Behaviour around the school is good Students’ risk management and keeping safe G Students’ attendance and punctuality G Rapidly improving Students’ behaviour towards others and freedom from bullying. G There is a good community ethos Current overall grade for BehaviourG

8. AchievementBehaviourTeachingL&MEvaluation SEF Review

9. Bradford District

11. University Academy Keighley

12. Bradford District

13. School A

14. Suburban School

15. Undersubscribed School

16. Turnaround Academy

17. Bradford District

18. Pupil Premium Attainment FSM Gap Hi Lo

19. Snail Trail 2013 BSH Bradford Secondary Heads 29%: 4 Levels Progress 39%: 3 Levels Progress 25%: 2 Levels Progress 7%: 0 Levels Progress 29%: 4 Levels Progress 68%: 3 Levels or more 93%: GCSE 5 A* - G = 2.8 Levels Progress National Average KS2 – KS4

20. Snail Trail 2013 BSH Bradford Secondary Heads Attainment: % 5 A*-C inc E&M Progress: Average Number of Levels KS2 to KS4

21. Successes in Our First 18 months o We have halved the gap between Bradford and the national average o No surprises: all Bradford Partnership judgements upheld by subsequent Ofsted inspections. o No Bradford secondary schools in Special Measures for the first time in over a decade. o We have doubled the number of schools judged Good or Outstanding from 7 to 14 out of a total of 28.