Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Impacts of Evaluation Professional Growth and Student Achievement.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Impacts of Evaluation Professional Growth and Student Achievement."— Presentation transcript:

1 Impacts of Evaluation Professional Growth and Student Achievement

2 Updated Evaluation Results SY 2011-2012SY 2012-13

3 Results from Fall READY Principals Ms. Jones – taught a lesson to first graders on weight and measurement. Rated on Standard 2b – Teachers embrace diversity in the school community and the world.

4 Results from Fall READY Principals Ms. Brown – taught a lesson to middle school students on area and perimeter. Rated on Standard 3b – Teachers know the content appropriate to their teaching specialty.

5 Results from Fall READY Principals Ms. Davis – taught a lesson to high school students on finding the center of a triangle. Rated on Standard 4e – Teachers help students develop critical-thinking and problem- solving skills.

6 Results from Fall READY Principals Average ratings and differences for Ms. Jones by years of experience. Ms. JonesNovice10 years20 years Average Rating1.6781.7321.681 Difference vs. Novice---0.0540.003 Difference vs. 10 years-0.054----0.051

7 Results from Fall READY Principals Average ratings and differences for Ms. Brown by years of experience. Ms. BrownNovice10 years20 years Average Rating3.2773.3133.597 Difference vs. Novice---0.0350.320*** Difference vs. 10 years-0.035---0.285***

8 Results from Fall READY Principals Average ratings and differences for Ms. Davis by years of experience. Ms. DavisNovice10 years20 years Average Rating3.5443.7583.812 Difference vs. Novice---0.214*0.268*** Difference vs. 10 years-0.214*---0.054

9 Does Evaluation Matter?

10 What would this analysis look like in North Carolina? How do you think teachers respond to lower ratings on their evaluations? Standards 3 and 4 have the highest correlation with growth scores. What does growth look like for teachers across the ratings of these standards? How does SY 2011-12 differ from SY 2012-13?

11 NC Evaluation Evaluation SY 11-12NumberMeanMinMax Less than Proficient811-1.44-15.0211.05 Proficient12167-0.28-17.8515.23 Accomplished or Better130370.63*-12.2719.20 Evaluation SY 12-13NumberMeanMinMax Less than Proficient1416-1.91-19.0311.71 Proficient18706-0.33-24.1618.86 Accomplished or Better181370.79*-33.5922.41

12 Standard 3 and Growth Standard 3 SY 11-12NumberMeanMinMax Not Demonstrated20-0.40-7.897.84 Developing367-1.60***-11.719.36 Proficient6975-0.54-17.8513.53 Accomplished69920.38***-13.1619.20 Distinguished14961.08***-10.8314.55 Standard 3 SY 12-13NumberMeanMinMax Not Demonstrated8-1.31-4.560.74 Developing645-1.85***-15.367.84 Proficient11366-0.60-24.1616.93 Accomplished95270.46***-33.5922.41 Distinguished16951.14***-16.6517.07

13 Standard 4 and Growth Standard 4 SY 11-12NumberMeanMinMax Not Demonstrated9-3.94-9.930.30 Developing481-1.69-13.069.36 Proficient9080-0.50-17.8513.29 Accomplished140420.46***-12.2719.20 Distinguished24031.03***-11.3614.54 Standard 4 SY 12-13NumberMeanMinMax Not Demonstrated17-2.58-12.014.85 Developing905-2.05***-16.357.84 Proficient14349-0.57-24.1616.93 Accomplished199270.57***-33.5922.41 Distinguished30611.35***-16.6516.71

14 Evaluation and Change in Growth Evaluation SY 11-12NumberMeanMinMax Less than Proficient4970.39*-14.1015.80 Proficient95370.19***-13.9422.16 Accomplished or Better104540.06-35.6915.45 Evaluation SY 12-13NumberMeanMinMax Less than Proficient2960.18-14.108.04 Proficient87790.18*-13.9422.16 Accomplished or Better114130.08-35.6918.32

15 Reflection and Questions How good of a job are we doing at recognizing instructional practices that predict student learning? Does the conventional wisdom that critical feedback is demoralizing to teachers hold true? Questions?

16 Impact of Standard 6 on Student Learning

17 Cohort Progress STUDENT COUNTS Low 1 High 2 Younger Math19351825 Reading184221 Older Math15601547 Reading183301 Two groups of students captured: Younger Cohort: began 5 th grade in SY 2010-2011 Older Cohort: began 6 th grade in SY 2010-2011 1 Students in the “Low Growth” category have consecutive years of teachers in the Does Not Meet Expected Growth category 2 Students in the “High Growth” category have consecutive years of teachers in the Exceeds Expected Growth category

18

19

20

21

22 Reflection and Questions Discuss with your table what these graphs mean to you as principals/educators. What should/could be the policy implications of these data? What other types of analyses would you like to see? Questions/Comments

23 Thank You Tom Tomberlin Director, District Human Resources thomas.tomberlin@dpi.nc.gov 919-807-3440


Download ppt "Impacts of Evaluation Professional Growth and Student Achievement."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google