1. Lassen County 2011 Supervisorial Reapportionment Public Hearing Lassen County Courthouse – Photo courtesy of Couso Technology & Design

2. 2010 FEDERAL CENSUS The United States Constitution directs Congress to count the total population in a federal census every ten years to determine representation in Congress. Equal population is the primary criteria for reapportioning Congressional districts.

3. California Citizens Redistricting Commission "Fair Representation―Democracy At Work!" 2008 and 2010 Voters First Redistricting Initiatives Passed by Voters Created New Rules and Criteria Establish a 14 member Citizens Redistricting Commission. Transferred authority to the commission for statewide district lines. Commission must conform with strict, nonpartisan rules designed to create districts of relatively equal population that provide fair representation.

4. Citizens Redistricting Commission State Assembly Senate Districts State Board of Equalization US House of Representatives

5. California State Assembly Districts Senate Districts

6. California State Board of Equalization Districts Congressional Districts

7. ad hoc 2011 Reapportionment Committee (in alpha order) Jenna Aguilera, Development Specialist, Economic Development Maurice Anderson, Director of Planning & Building Services Kenneth Bunch, Assessor Julie Bustamante, County Clerk-Recorder-Registrar of Voters Richard Crabtree, County Counsel Richard Egan, Treasurer-Tax Collector Baden Falkowski, Deputy Clerk-Recorder-Registrar of Voters

8. LOCAL JURISDICTIONS Local governments are also required to examine their district lines every ten years. California Elections Code Section 21500-21506 sets the criteria for establishing boundaries of Supervisorial districts. Contiguity Preservation of Cities and Counties/ Respect for Communities of Interest Incumbent Protection Compliance with Voter Rights Act (VRA)

9. Our Goal Adjust the boundaries of any or all of the supervisorial districts so the districts are as nearly equal in population as possible (allowing for a 5% deviation approved by the Department of Justice). Keep districts contiguous. Keep districts compact.

10. REAPPORTIONMENT TIMELINE Sept. 13, 2011 - First Public Hearing: Today we will begin to receive public comment; Ask for possible direction to staff; If necessary, continue the Public Hearing. Sept. 27, 2011 – Next Scheduled Public Hearing: Receive additional public comment; and possibly make a final decision. October 25, 2011: Last opportunity for board to make a decision. Reapportionment must be completed by November 1, 2011. Elections Code 21502: Requires a Supervisorial Redistricting Committee to draw the lines before December 31, 2011.

11. 1960 Supervisorial Districts Population Dist. 1 Westwood 1,525 11.21% Dist. 2 Susanville 8,066 59.29% Dist. 3 Honey Lake 2,632 19.35% Dist. 4 Big Valley 1,028 7.56% Dist. 5 Madeline Plains 3522.59%

12. 1963 Court Ordered Supervisorial Boundary Changes

13. Lassen County Ideal Population per Supervisorial District 19,288 Voting age population less prison population 3,858 per District Department of Justice (DOJ) approves a 5% Deviation - Range 3,665 to 4,051

14. Current Population per District Lassen County’s current Population per Supervisorial District (according to the 2010 Census): District 1 - 3,294 564 under Ideal Population District 2 - 4,203 345 over Ideal Population District 3 - 4,001 143 over Ideal Population District 4 - 4,120 262 over Ideal Population District 5 - 3,670 188 under Ideal Population

15. A Little More History 1975 Supervisorial Districts1980 Supervisorial Districts

16. Major Shift in Districts 3 & 5 1990 Supervisorial Districts 2000 Minor Changes

17. CRITERIA Judicially recognized traditional districting principles: Compactness of Territory Districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness. Compactness reflects the notion that districts should be composed of a tightly defined area so that representatives may be able to more efficiently communicate with their constituents. Contiguity Contiguity requires that all parts of a district must be connected. Preservation of Cities and Counties/ Respect for Communities of Interest The geographic integrity of any city, county, local neighborhood, or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes their division. A community of interest is a contiguous population which shares common social and economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation. Incumbent protection The term of office of any supervisor who has been elected shall not be affected by any change in the boundaries of the district from which he or she was elected. Compliance with Voter Rights Act Federal voting rights laws prohibit disenfranchising minority groups with common racial, ethnic or language interests. It is the Committees Opinion that District 5 does not meet this Criteria

18. Suggested Plan #3 has the least impact on the voting population. Splits Precinct 422 by adding 231 voters into District #2, and removing them from District #4 Moves precincts 215 and 222 into District #1 No changes to Districts #3 & #5 Leaves District #5 Very Large Geographically

19. Suggested Plan #2 Moves Eagle Lake entirely into District # 4 Brings the districts closer to historical boundaries Makes District #5 more geographically compact Shifts the South portion of District #5 into District #3 Brings District #5 into the City Adds a highly populated area (Johnstonville) to District #1, which could be considered a violation of “the geographic integrity of any city, county, local neighborhood, or local community of interest (Westwood)…. in a manner that minimizes their division.”

20. The Committees’ Recommendation which is ADVISORY only. Makes District 5 more geographically compact Restores districts closer to historical boundaries Changes the supervisorial representative for a large number of the population

21. In Conclusion All decisions are that of the Board of Supervisors. Reapportionment must be completed before November 1, 2011. Additional Information: We currently have more than 5 precincts with a voting population between 700 and 1000. In an effort to keep precinct population balanced, precincts with a population well over 500 will be divided into a smaller size. This will not effect any districts, including Supervisorial.