1. Implementation Approach UCPUCP

2. UCPUCP Lessons Learned Renewed and heightened focus on pedestrian mobility. Pedestrian realm (sidewalks and crosswalks) Building / sidewalk relationship

3. UCPUCP Elements Under Consideration 1. Pedestrian cross section

4. UCPUCP Elements Under Consideration 2. Build-within-zone 3. Minimum built frontage 4. Minimum transparency 5. Sidewalk entrances 6. Driveway spacing standards

5. UCPUCP Illustration 10’ Planting & Utilities 5’ Pedestrian Zone 75% Min. Transparency 25% 75% Built Frontage Curb Edge of Pedestrian Realm Property Line 10’ Build Within Zone

6. UCPUCP Issues to Consider 1. Mandatory vs. incentivized 2. Geographic application 3. Neighborhood protection

7. UCPUCP Mandatory vs. Incentivized 1. Mandatory elements – all corridors A. Pedestrian realm standard B. Driveway spacing 2. Other elements may be incentivized

8. UCPUCP Mandatory vs. Incentivized 1. Economic / market implications A. Direct costs B. Market / risk (“1,321’ effect”) 2. Opportunities for incentives A. Urban corridor standards B. Obtainable benefits Increased buildable area Reduced parking requirements

9. UCPUCP Increased Buildable Area

10. UCPUCP Geographic Application Pedestrian Core District Other Corridor University Uptown

11. UCPUCP Geographic Application 1. Uptown A. Incentivized 2. “Other corridor” A. Incentivized B. Linked to neighborhood protection 3. Core pedestrian district A. Possibly mandatory elements & “automatic” benefits B. Also possible additional incentives

12. UCPUCP Neighborhood Protections 1. Angular plane A. Tied to incentives 2. Single family share threshold for withholding incentives 3. “Other corridor” areas only Angular Plane Lot Line

13. UCPUCP Upcoming Process 1. Ordinance & Policy Drafting 2. Defined Review Process A. Mixed Use / TOD Committee B. Planning Commission C. City Council Committee on Regulation, Nbhd Protection and Development D. City Council

14. Implementation Approach UCPUCP