2. Agenda Final Modal Assignments Prioritization Supporting Network Financial Analysis

3. 22 Corridors SunRail High Speed Rail Winter Park US 192 Silver Star Rd Sanford Innovation Way US 17-92 SR 436 US 441 US 441/17-92 SR 50 John Young Pkwy Orange Ave Kirkman Rd SR 528 SR 434 Aloma Ave Maitland Blvd Seminole Way

4. Methodology Overview Step 1 Segment Identification Step 2 Segment Potential Step 3 Corridor Prioritization · Population Density · Employment Density · Land Use · Area Type · User Market · Accessibility · Transit Orientation · Activity Centers · Average Trip Length · Existing Transit Ridership · Right-of-Way Availability · Transit Demand · Traffic Conditions · Roadway Improvements · Compatibility Step 1 Segment Identification Step 2 Segment Potential Step 3 Corridor Prioritization

5. 2030 TOD* Modal Assignments Local Bus Enhanced Express Bus Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed Light Rail Streetcar SunRail High Speed Rail * Consistent with MetroPlan’s adopted alternative land use plan

6. Prioritization Methodology Overview Mode prioritization by segment Cost identification by segment Cost vs. available revenue comparison Identification of financially feasible service Network compatibility adjustments Policy adjustments Network compatibility adjustments Supporting network identification

7. Mode Prioritization by Segment Existing Conditions Score 2030 Conditions Score 2015 Score 2020 Score 2025 Score Segment aa Segment cc Segment xx … Segment aa Segment cc Segment xx … Segment bb Segment yy Segment zz … Segment zz Segment dd Segment ee … Segment dd Segment aa Segment ff … Linear Interpolation Funding Cut-off

8. 2015 TOD Modal Assignments Local Bus Enhanced Express Bus Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed Light Rail Streetcar SunRail High Speed Rail

9. 2020 TOD Modal Assignments Local Bus Enhanced Express Bus Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed Light Rail Streetcar SunRail High Speed Rail

10. 2025 TOD Modal Assignments Local Bus Enhanced Express Bus Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed Light Rail Streetcar SunRail High Speed Rail

11. 2030 TOD Modal Assignments Local Bus Enhanced Express Bus Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed Light Rail Streetcar SunRail High Speed Rail

12. LRTP Transit Cost Feasible Plan I-Drive to Medical City/ Innovation Way LRT US 441 to Apopka US 17/92 north of Winter Park Pine Hills Road Medical City/Innovation Way to UCF BRT

13. LRTP and Vision 2030 Differences Compilation of findings from different studies Different corridor set Varying age of data Different methodologies Policy decisions Corridor versus network approach

14. Supporting Network Review of supporting local bus network Improve frequencies of current routes – 30 minutes on most routes – 15 minutes on some routes Addition of community connectors and flex- route circulators

15. Supporting Network Community Connectors – Circulates on specific route – Makes frequent stops at bus stops Flex-Route Circulators – Operates in a specified area – Circulates on a specific route but deviates within service area when requested

16. 2030 Community Connectors and Flex-Route Circulators Local Bus Enhanced Express Bus Rapid Transit - Exclusive Bus Rapid Transit - Mixed Light Rail Streetcar SunRail High Speed Rail Community Connector Flex-Route Circulator John Young Parkway S Orange Ave S WinterGarden OrlovistaConway Goldenrod ColonialTown Maitland Zellwood Heathrow Sanford Poinciana

17. Financial Analysis Expanded LYNX short-range model Developed cost and revenue growth rate assumptions Evaluated future funding needs based on existing conditions Analyzed impact of potential supplemental revenue sources

18. TOD Scenario: Operating Costs

19. TOD Scenario: Operating Costs & Revenues

20. TOD Scenario: Capital Costs

21. TOD Scenario: Capital Costs & Revenues

22. Operating Costs & Potential Revenues 2015 2020 2025 2030

23. Near-Term Recommendations Work with MetroPlan to ensure LYNX Vision 2030 is incorporated into 2040 LRTP update Meet with local jurisdictions and MetroPlan Land Use Subcommittee to discuss how localities can make adopted LRTP land use plan a reality Need to ensure changes do not create disproportionate adverse impacts to under- represented individuals

24. Near-Term Recommendations Explore options for dedicated/supplementary funding for transit Develop and implement bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly land use policies Continue coordination and discussions with stakeholders (i.e., Disney, OIA, UCF, etc.)

25. Mid-Term Recommendations Update the plan on a regular basis Identify additional corridors for inclusion in next update Work with counties and municipalities to develop transit-supportive growth plans – Develop transit-supportive corridor plans Undertake individual corridor studies to identify better termini, operational improvements, and implementation plan

26. Mid-Term Recommendations Study the possibility of implementing Limited Stop Connector Service Secure dedicated funding source for transit Identify locations for park-and-ride lots Continue coordination and discussions with stakeholders (i.e., Disney, OIA, UCF, etc.)

27. Long-Term Recommendations Changing conditions will need to be monitored (i.e., Medical City/Innovation Way development, HSR, etc.) Continue coordination and discussions with stakeholders (i.e., Disney, OIA, UCF, etc.)

28. Questions or Comments Thank you