1. Default Market Images located at S:\template\presentation\images\banners Alabama Statewide ITS Architecture Stakeholders Meeting November 21, 2013

2. Welcome from Director Cooper

3. Welcome and Introductions

4. Meeting Agenda  ITS and the Statewide ITS Architecture  Coordination between Agencies  Existing and Planned ITS Systems, Projects, Programs  Local Needs and Opportunities  Next Steps  Q&A and Wrap-Up

5. ITS and the Statewide ITS Architecture

6. What is ITS?  Intelligent Transportation Systems …  Officially - Electronics, communications, or information processing used singly or in combination to improve the efficiency or safety of a surface transportation system. (23 CFR Part 940)  Unofficially - People using technology in transportation to save time, lives, and money

7. ITS Components  Communications  Surveillance  Detection  Data processing  Information Dissemination  Centers (TCCs, TMCs)  Data Archive / Data Management

8. ITS Stakeholders  Transportation Agencies  Transit Agencies/Other Transit Providers  Planning Organizations  Public Safety Agencies  Fleet Operators  Travelers  Activity Centers  …and many more

9.  Pre-Trip Information  En-route Information  Tourism and Events Traveler Information Systems

10.  Traffic Surveillance  Traffic Control  Lane Management  Parking Management  Information Dissemination  Enforcement Arterial Management Systems

11.  Traffic Surveillance  Special Event Transportation Management  Information Dissemination  Lane Management  Enforcement  Ramp Control Freeway Management Systems

12.  Surveillance and Detection  Mobilization and Response  Information Dissemination  Clearance and Recovery Incident Management Systems

13.  Hazardous Materials Management  Emergency Medical Services  Response and Recovery Emergency Management Systems

14.  Information Dissemination  Asset Management  Work Zone Management Roadway Operations & Maintenance

15.  Surveillance, Monitoring, and Prediction  Information Dissemination  Traffic Control  Response and Treatment Road Weather Management Systems

16.  Road Geometry Warning Systems  Highway Rail Crossing Systems  Intersection Collision Warning  Bicycle Warning Systems  Animal Warning Systems  Pedestrian Safety Crash Prevention and Safety Systems

17.  Freight Tracking  Asset Tracking  Freight Terminal Processes  Drayage Operations  Freight Highway Connector Systems  International Border Crossing (IBC) Processes Intermodal Freight

18.  Credential Administration  Safety Assurance  Electronic Screening  Carrier Operations and Fleet Management  Security Operations Commercial Vehicle Operations

19.  Safety and Security  Transit Demand Management  Fleet Management  Information Dissemination Transit Management Systems

20.  Toll Collection  Transit Fare Payment  Multi-use Payment Electronic Payment Systems

21.  Collision Warning Systems  Driver Assistance Systems  Collision Notification (“Mayday”) Systems Connected Vehicles

22. Benefits of ITS

23. What is an ITS Architecture? A specific, tailored framework for ensuring institutional agreement and technical integration for the implementation of ITS projects in a particular region. It functionally defines what pieces of the system are linked to others and what information is exchanged between them.

24. Benefits of an ITS Architecture  Improves interagency coordination  Provides better services to public  Engages stakeholders  Facilitates future ITS expansion  Supports integration and interoperability  Helps tailor ITS to local requirements  Qualifies state for federal funding

25. Alabama Statewide ITS Architecture  Replaces out-dated Regional ITS Architectures:  Huntsville  Montgomery  Shoals  Mobile  Birmingham  New Statewide ITS Architecture encompasses all areas and stakeholders in the state.  Any additional Regional ITS Architectures (not required), should be consistent with Statewide ITS Architecture.

26. Coordination between Agencies

27. Major Traffic Incident Scenario

28. Coordination between Agencies  How do agencies coordinate today?  What are their roles and responsibilities?  What are areas of improvement needed in interagency coordination?  How can ITS help interagency coordination?

29. Break – 15 mins

30. Existing and Planned ITS Systems, Projects, Programs

31. ITS in Alabama

32.  5 CCTV  2 DMS  7 Detectors  2 HAR ALDOT Division 1

33.  8 CCTV  2 DMS  2 Weather  2 HAR  3 Detectors ALDOT Division 2

34.  72 CCTV  14 DMS ALDOT Division 3

35.  43 CCTV  13 DMS 5 ALDOT Division 5

36.  51 CCTV  10 DMS  3 HAR  50 Detectors ALDOT Division 6

37.  101 CCTV  15 DMS  7 HAR  28 Detectors ALDOT SW Region

38. Other Existing info from Surveys  76% of respondents exchange info with Incident/Emergency management agencies  56% of respondents disseminate traffic information to the public via the internet  Top 3 user services for mitigating transportation problems are Traffic Control, Incident Management and Disaster Response/Evacuation  At least 10 different agencies currently track incident response times and clearance times.

39.  Adaptive Signals  Algo  I-10 Corridor  I-65 DMS Project  Video Wall Projects  FHWA Scan Tour ALDOT Current & Planned ITS Projects

40. Location # Int.Project Cost Cost per Intersection Montgomery35$1,800,000$51,500 Birmingham25$1,450,000$58,000 Huntsville16$960,000$60,000 Total76$4,210,000$55,400  3 Pilot Projects  Montgomery  Birmingham  Huntsville  Pre & Post Corridor Study  Future Projects  ALDOT Program  Municipal ATRIP projects  Qualification demonstration Adaptive Signals (SCATS)

41.  Montgomery  East & South Boulevard  35 intersections  13 miles  $1.8 million  Awarded to World Fiber  City of Montgomery maintenance responsibility Adaptive Signals

42.  Birmingham  US 280  25 intersections  9 miles  $1.45 million  Awarded to American Lighting & Signalization  ALDOT maintenance responsibility Adaptive Signals

44.  Huntsville  US 431 (Governors Dr)  16 intersections  8 miles  $960,000  Awarded to Shoals Electric  City of Huntsville maintenance responsibility Adaptive Signals

45.  Deployment status:  Montgomery 80%  Mobile 20%  Birmingham 0% www.algotraffic.com (coming soon) Mobile app (coming soon) algo

46. Corridor

47. I-65 DMS Project - Montgomery

52.  Designed by Stantec  Letting Date  November 2013 – Mobile  2014 – Birmingham  2014 – Montgomery Video Walls

53. FHWA Scan Tour

54.  March 11 – 15, 2013  Florida DOT  D5 & OOCEA – Orlando  D4 – Ft. Lauderdale  D7 - Tampa FHWA Scan Tour

55.  Complete the ALGO deployment (statewide traffic management system software)  Develop a Statewide ITS Architecture  Develop a Strategic Business Plan  Dedicate staffing  Develop performance measures  Develop an ITS network segregated from the current IT network  Develop standards and specifications for ITS deployments and devices  Develop TMC Standard Operations Procedures FHWA Scan Tour Action Items

56.  Develop Traffic Incident Management procedures  Expand the ASAP program  Implement 511 (meet the 2014 CFR requirement)  Utilize contract services as a force multiplier  Expand TMC operations to other regional areas (consider a statewide facility)  Standardize statewide systems  Develop a training program for maintenance and operations FHWA Scan Tour Action Items

57. Other Planned Systems from Questionnaires  Implementing a traffic management center, fiber optic cables and CCTV  Planning a dispatch center to receive and dispatch customer service requests  Signalized intersection coordination via centralized traffic control center  Cameras, detection devices, DMS signs  Increasing surveillance areas and TMC relocation

58.  Fiber audit and relocating fiber  Continuing project to update communications  Potential expansion of transit services  Upgrading scheduling and dispatching software  Maintenance funded weather monitoring and traffic cameras Other Planned Systems from Questionnaires

59.  70% of respondents feel Coordinated Signal Systems would be beneficial in their area.  67% feel Integrated Regional Management would be beneficial.  63% feel Integrated Emergency Response would be beneficial. Other Information from Questionnaires

60. Overview of Local Needs and Opportunities Discussions

61. Local Needs and Opportunities  Traffic incident management  Emergency response  Congestion  Safety  Others?

62. Lunch – 30 mins

63. Local Needs and Opportunities Discussions

64. Local Needs and Opportunities  Traffic incident management  Emergency response  Congestion  Safety  Others?

65. Highlights from Local Discussions

66. Top Local Needs and Opportunities  First Division  Second Division  Third Division  Fourth Division  Fifth Division  Seventh Division  SW Region  Central Office

67. Next Steps

68.  ITS Stakeholder Questionnaires returned by Monday Dec. 2 nd  Develop Draft ITS Architecture Document  Stakeholders Review / Comment on Draft Document (March 2014)  Develop Final ITS Architecture Document  Send electronic copies of the completed Alabama Statewide ITS Architecture Document to stakeholders (May 2014)

69. Q&A

70. For More Information  Visit: Alabama Statewide ITS Architecture website at: http://www.aldotitsarchitecture.com  Contact: Gary W. Moore, P.E. ALDOT Traffic Design Engineer (334)-242-6160 mooreg@dot.state.al.us

71. Thank you!