1. Restorative Practices 2009 Margaret McGarrigle 087 7752554 margaret.mcgarrigle@gmail.com margaret.mcgarrigle@gmail.com

2. Restorative Justice is…… …..a process to involve, to the extent possible, those who have a stake in a specific offence and to collectively identify and address harms, needs and obligations, in order to heal and put things as right as possible Howard Zehr, 2003

3. Short-term discipline To stop inappropriate behaviour while explaining what is appropriate Long-term discipline To help young people take responsibility for their own behaviour To teach self-discipline – when people’s lives and behaviour are too regulated by others, they feel no need to control themselves.

4. Our Task … Think of SelfThink of Others Minimise harm Recognise the extent of the harm caused Become the Victim They become accountable Blame OthersAccept Responsibility Excluded from process Marginalised Included in process Integrated Punitive Restorative

5. Human beings are happier, more productive and more likely to make positive changes in their behavior when those in positions of authority do things with them, rather than to them or for them. Fundamental Unifying Hypothesis of Restorative Practices

6. Social Discipline Window How can you practice consistently in this domain?

7. HIGH LOWHIGH FIRM FIRM FAIR SOCIAL DISCIPLINE WINDOW( Mc Cold) RELATIONSHIP STYLES Power Struggles ConfrontationAuthoritarianWin-LoseRetributionStigmatising ConsistentResponsiveFlexibleAccountableResponsibleCooperationNegotiation UncaringTiredLazy Burnt Out Given Up ChaoticInconsistentExcusing Giving In Blurred Boundaries Rescuing

8. Central Idea of Fair Process Kim & Mauborgne, Harvard Business Review, July-August 1997 Individuals are most likely to trust and cooperate freely with systems — whether they themselves win or lose by those systems — when fair process is observed.

9. FAIR PROCESS Expectations- everyone knows what is expected. Engagement - involve individuals in decisions/ listen to views. Explanation - clarify how decisions are reached.

10. The free expression of emotion inherent in restorative practices not only restores, but also proactively builds new relationships and social capital.

11. Social capital Social capital is defined as the connections among individuals and the trust, mutual understanding, shared values and behaviors that bind us together and make cooperative action possible. Putnam, 2001; Cohen & Prusak, 2001

12. The Compass of Shame Nathanson, 1992

13. A continuum of responses Informal Language/Tone/Non-verbal Affective Questions/Open/Curious Formal Restorative ‘chat’ / Circle Time Small impromptu conference Circle or classroom conference Formal School Group Conference

14. To Offender What happened? What were you thinking at the time? What have you thought about since? Who has been affected? In what way? What do you think you need to do to make things right?

15. To harmed; What did you think when you realised what happened? What impact has this had on you and others? What has been the hardest thing for you? What do you think needs to happen to make things right?

16. School Group Conference Offenders tell what they did Everyone talks about what impact this has had on them The group reaches a shared understanding of the harm that has been done The group negotiates an agreement about how to repair the damage and minimise further harm.

17. High degree of satisfaction after restorative interventions Significant decrease –in number of detentions –In visits to Principals Office –In suspensions in some schools Improved staff –student relationships (reported from staff and students) Impact on behaviour management – both individual and class. Positive response from parents More calm, less stressed communication Donegal/Galway reports;

18. Culture Change Culture – result of messages that are received about what is really valued. Behaviour is aligned to these messages in order to fit in. Changing culture = a systematic and planned change to these messages whose sources are behaviour, symbols and systems. Margaret Thorsborne Peta Blood

19. Young People on Restorative Practice …. It’s civilised ….you don’t have to shout….you can listen to each other. Everyone was able to understand what has happened and I was able to make up for what I did. Its Fair – staff have to do it if they are in the wrong. I got a chance to say what I wanted to say and people had to listen xxxxx was able to forgive me and we have a really good relationship now.

20. “Relationships are at the core”!!! Relationships are guided by mutual respect and understanding Where we have relationships within an environment, whether living environment or working environment, this creates a community. Damage mutually impacts on relationships / community. We each are governed by our relationships with others.

21. Building a Restorative Community- Core Elements Explicit Framework Fair Process Working “With” Awareness of where the young person is at – “compass of shame” Awareness of where self is at! Use of Restorative language Respect, Responsibility, Reparation, Restore.

22. Hazards in the lives of youth at risk; Destructive relationships - distrust the world Climates of futility - labels, negativity Learned irresponsibility - training for obedience rather than independence Loss of purpose - no sense of value to others

23. The reclaiming environment involves; Relating to the reluctant Brain Friendly Learning Discipline for Responsibility The courage to care.

24. Features of a reclaiming environment; BELONGING in a supportive environment rather than lost in bureaucracy Realizing MASTERY rather than enduring inflexible systems for the convenience of the adults INDEPENDENCE - Young people determining their own future in the context of a society needing to control harmful behavior. GENEROSITY -Young people as care-givers, not just helpless recipients overly dependent of the care of adults.