2. Housing Choice: Most Promising Housing Strategies 2005 American Planning Association State National Planning Conference San Francisco, CA March 20, 2005

3. Bill Klein, AICP Director of Research, American Planning Association bklein@planning.org Stuart Meck, FAICP Senior Research Fellow, American Planning Association smeck@planning.org Lynn M. Ross Research Associate, American Planning Association lross@planning.org

4. Housing Choice Scoping Sessions Sponsored by Fannie Mae Foundation 6 half-day sessions held Fall 2004 North Carolina, Southern New England, Oregon-Washington, Midwest, Texas, and California. Participants from various disciplines.

5. Key Discussion Components Each Scoping Session Addressed: 1.Housing Need 2.Politics of Housing 3.Affordable Housing Production and Retention 4.Most Promising Strategies

6. North Carolina

7. Housing Need (North Carolina) Regional differences –East –Metropolitan areas –Coastal areas and resort areas Impact of second home owners Section 8 waiting list Demand for one person units

8. Politics of Housing (North Carolina) Lack of overarching housing policy Housing policy and production functions spread out No dedicated source of funding

9. Affordable Housing Production and Retention (North Carolina) Lack of capacity for rehabilitation Limitations on investment tax credits Shortage of land for multifamily housing Difficulty in amending state building code Lack of express authority of inclusionary zoning Race-based opposition

10. North Carolina: Most Promising Housing Strategies Education on handling money and credit Authorization for inclusionary zoning Statewide minimum housing code Development of rental housing production capacity Incentivized housing trust fund for realtors and bankers Education campaign on benefits of affordable housing

11. Southern New England

12. Housing Need (Southern New England) Transition from industrial to service economy Changes in household size and composition Immigration, especially for key target areas Loss of subsidy for very low income hshds Stratification/segregation Focus on workforce hsng impacts very low income

13. Politics of Housing (Southern New England) Anti-tax feelings drive the discussion Resources down to ¼ what they once were Anti-development feelings generally Fear of in-migration, impact on schools Perception of excess profits by developers Legitimate infrastructure needs The Governor must lead

14. Affordable Housing Production and Retention (Southern New England) Devolution of Federal responsibilities More sophisticated ways to stop dev Loss of by-right zoning for multi-family Lack of certainty in process Diminished profitability, fewer for-profits Impact fees; pacing and phasing mechanisms; off-site improvements

15. Southern New England: Most Promising Housing Strategies Massachusetts Chapter 40R: Smart Growth Zoning Districts –2 carrots for higher density Rhode Island Public Laws, Chapter 286 –R.I. Affordable Housing Act Inclusionary Housing Strategies –Voluntary vs. mandatory inclusionary tools

16. Oregon-Washington

17. Housing Need (Oregon-Washington) Most counties in Washington and Oregon have affordable housing need Age and income cohorts affect housing Immigration impact—Hispanics represent 1 in 3 new households Portland, Corvallis becoming more expensive Seattle—very expensive

18. Politics of Housing (Oregon-Washington) Strong state growth management structure Limitation on use of inclusionary zoning in Oregon No dedicated source of funds Voluntary housing goals from Portland Metro Reliance on sales tax and commercial activity

19. Affordable Housing Production and Retention (Oregon-Washington) Land inside Portland growth boundary “not ready for development” Hard to find individual building lots for under $100,000 Hope VI working well in Seattle Investment tax credits—too many soft costs

20. Oregon-Washington: Most Promising Housing Strategies Oregon LCDC needs to develop capacity to assist local governments with affordable housing Needs to be a mechanism to pledge affordable housing as a condition of UGB expansions Real estate transfer tax for affordable housing, lift ban on exclusionary zoning in Oregon Banking land for affordable housing Citizen education More short term activity to produce affordable units

21. Midwest

22. Housing Need (Midwest) Participants were from Indiana Loss of jobs—no longer strong industrial base Central Indiana housing affordable, northern part of state more need Lack of high-end housing in Indianapolis Imbalance of housing choices in Indy region Lack of very low income housing Homelessness

23. Politics of Housing (Midwest) State has 66 public housing authorities But state oversees public housing No dedicated revenue source for affordable housing No housing planning requirement in Indiana, but now in Illinois

24. Affordable Housing Production and Retention (Midwest) Manufactured housing filling needs in rural areas of state Special exception requirements for manufactured housing Fort Wayne citywide housing strategy Affordable housing trust fund in Indianapolis Owner-occupied downtown housing in Indy

25. Midwest: Most Promising Housing Strategies Illinois Comprehensive Housing Plan Illinois Affordable Housing Planning and Appeal Act Cooperative efforts outside government Training local planning commissions concerning affordable housing UniGov approach to housing to share burdens and benefits

26. Texas

27. Housing Need (Texas) Immigrant Influx Household Composition Spatial Component- Rural v. Urban Jobs- Housing Balance Change in Poverty Dynamics Boom/Bust Economy

28. Politics of Housing (Texas) State Level –Not typically a Governors Office issue –A Regional Issue for the Legislature Local Level –NIMBY –Race and Income Segregation –Property Values

29. Affordable Housing Production and Retention (Texas) Low Income Housing Tax Credit Regulatory Barrier Removal State Programs Role of the Non-profit Sector Manufactured Housing

30. Texas: Most Promising Housing Strategies S.M.A.R.T. Housing TM program –Austin Land Assemblage Redevelopment Authority (LARA) –Houston Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) – San Antonio

31. California

32. Housing Need (California) Sharp population growth Immigration Inadequate production of housing overall Two markets –Those who bought early –Those who are trying to get in Speculative housing in Sacramento region

33. Politics of Housing (California) Proposition 13 and impact Housing policy not a priority for any governor Lack of comprehensive approach Local government barriers—larger houses, larger lots

34. Affordable Housing Production and Retention (California) Builders wary of affordable housing market Regulatory barriers Private, but not public, enforcement of state housing element law Lack of certainty San Diego SRO

35. California: Most Promising Strategies More housing generally Accessory dwelling units Higher densities Statewide inclusionary zoning Maintaining Section 8 The “Urban Williamson Act” Linking affordable housing to job development Building affordable housing in smaller clusters

36. Top 10 Most Common Themes 10. Impact of Local/Regional Tax Structure 9. Inadequate State Funding for Housing 8. Lack of Support at State Legislative Level 7. Use of Tax Credits 6. Wages vs. Cost of Living

37. Top 10 Most Common Themes 5. Service Gap for the Very Low Income 4. Change in Household Composition 3. Impact of Federal Programs 2. Need for More Education, Training, and Capacity-Building Programs 1. Not In My Backyard

38. Learn More APA Website, www.planning.orgwww.planning.org Affordable Housing Reader –Free online reader features 100 APA published articles. Housing and Community Development Division –Learn about the division activities, join, read the newsletter. Housing Choice online (coming soon) –Complete session summaries, theme analysis, strategy descriptions.

39. Thank you for attending! 2005 American Planning Association National Planning Conference San Francisco, CA