Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance Management Systems: Clashing Symbols or Marching Tunes? Dr Ruth Dixon Department of Politics and International Relations University of Oxford.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance Management Systems: Clashing Symbols or Marching Tunes? Dr Ruth Dixon Department of Politics and International Relations University of Oxford."— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Management Systems: Clashing Symbols or Marching Tunes? Dr Ruth Dixon Department of Politics and International Relations University of Oxford Managing the Politics of National Performance Targets: Country Scorecards, National Results Frameworks, Delivery Units World Bank Seminar 3 May 2012

2 Performance Management Systems: Clashing Symbols or Marching Tunes? Dr Ruth Dixon Department of Politics and International Relations University of Oxford Christopher Hood and Ruth Dixon, 2010. The Political Payoff from Performance Target Systems JPART 20 (Suppl. 2): i281-i298.

3 UK Government Performance Systems Executive Agencies; Audit Commission; National Audit Office. 1979-1990 Margaret Thatcher Citizen’s Charter. 1990-1997 John Major Public Service Agreements (PSAs); 3- year spending plans. 1997-2001 Tony Blair 1 st term PM’s Delivery Unit; 20 key PSAs; Efficiency Programmes. 2001-2005 Tony Blair 2 nd term Departmental Capability Reviews. 2005-2007 Tony Blair 3 rd term; Gordon Brown Departmental Business Plans. 2010-… David Cameron 3Ruth Dixon 2012

4 Symbolic or Substantive? What did they claim? Autonomy; Market discipline; Value for Money / Cost-cutting. 1979-1990 Margaret Thatcher Focus on service users. 1990-1997 John Major Perf management for central depts; “Education”; targeted spending. 1997-2001 Tony Blair 1 st term Accountability – high-stakes targets; Public money well spent; Pledges met. 2001-2005 Tony Blair 2 nd term Developing capability and leadership in civil service. 2005-2007 Tony Blair 3 rd term; Gordon Brown ‘No More Targets’; Budget cuts. 2010-… David Cameron 4Ruth Dixon 2012

5 Symbolic or Substantive? Did achievements match claims? Agencies created across public service  ; Cost of government rose . 1979-1990 Margaret Thatcher Public satisfaction fell to record lows  ; Admin costs fell slightly  1990-1997 John Major Education standards rose sharply  ; NHS continued to languish . 1997-2001 Tony Blair 1 st term NHS standards rose  ; Public spending rose; Targets increasingly unpopular . 2001-2005 Tony Blair 2 nd term Focus on delivery throughout civil service . 2005-2007 Tony Blair 3 rd term; Gordon Brown Public spending still rising  ; ‘Process targets’ appear in business plans. 2010-… David Cameron 5Ruth Dixon 2012

6 Education Standards Rose in Blair’s First Term 6Ruth Dixon 2012 2001 PMDU 1997 SEU

7 Hospital Waiting Lists Fell in Blair’s Second Term 7Ruth Dixon 2012 Source: Department of Health Annual Report 2006

8 Public Opinion Improved 8Ruth Dixon 2012 British Social Attitudes Survey Blair’s second term

9 Hood and Dixon, 2010 Targets became increasingly unpopular with public and press 9Ruth Dixon 2012 UK Newspaper Articles on Health and Education Targets

10 Targets remained popular with central bureaucrats and NHS managers Source: http://www.nhsmanagers.net/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/targetspressrelease.pdf NHS Managers surveyed June 2010 Whitehall Civil Servants interviewed 2004-2005 Opinion of targets for raising standards in public services Negative Neutral Positive Q: Targets are history and that’s a good thing. Hood and Dixon, 2010 4 % 34 % 62 %

11 Delivery Targets as Symbols Credit claiming Blame shifting Demonstrate control Political reputation Appear fiscally responsible See Hood 2011 The Blame Game 11Ruth Dixon 2012  If standards improve  Incentive to succeed  ‘Impose’ best practice  Delivery important  Understand spending – or Levers for Improvement? “Action expresses priorities” (Gandhi)

12 Acknowledgements I am very grateful to Christopher Hood, Gladstone Professor of Government, University of Oxford, who led the research described here and who has shaped my thinking on political science. My thanks also to Dr Catherine Haddon, Institute for Government, and to several current and former senior civil servants for helpful discussions. This work was funded by the Leverhulme Trust and the ESRC Public Services Programme. See also xgov.politics.ox.ac.uk and christopherhood.net 12Ruth Dixon 2012


Download ppt "Performance Management Systems: Clashing Symbols or Marching Tunes? Dr Ruth Dixon Department of Politics and International Relations University of Oxford."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google