1. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome Modelling Advice and Support Services to Integrate the Virtual component in Higher Education Isabel Pérez, Universidad de Granada

2. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Basis and objectives of the project  The anticipated results and development of the project  The MASSIVE peer review model  Intermediate conclusions Introduction

3. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  The Lisbon Strategy an eLearning in Higher Education  The Bologna process and the promotion of quality  Integration of ICT in European Universities not homogenous Iniciatives

4. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome Progress in eLearning  In most universities the result has been a transference of traditional pedagogy into the computer environment  Only a minor number of universities use ICT to design programmes based on a new methodology

5. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome Virtual Campus Evolution of University Libraries IPR Management Training and teachers’ support Students’ support University strategies to integrate virtual components Design of online courses 6 Areas

6. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA (ES)– PROJECT COORDINATOR  UNIVERSIDAD DE BARCELONA (ES)  FIM NEW LEARNING (DE)  BUDAPEST MÜSZAKI GAZDASÁGTUDOMÁNYI EGYETM (HU)  UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN (NO)  MALTS - UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH (UK)  EUROPACE (BE)  SCIENTER ESPAÑA (ES)  SCIENTER (IT)  SOCIEDAD DIGITAL DE AUTORES Y EDITORES, SGAE (ES)  TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE (UK) Project Partners

7. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Objetive: to design a model of mutual support services for European traditional Universities to successfully implement the virtual component of teaching  Strategy: “peer review” MASSIVE Approach

8. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Desk research reports in the 6 areas proposed.  Criteria and tools to identify good practices.  Comparative report on strategies, services and transferable elements  Peer review methodology to assess the implementation of eLearning Anticipated Results

9. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Widely used to introduce new techniques and to improve the educational offer by integrating correctives among colleagues  It allows the involved institutions to take part in a dialogue between both sides as colleagues do  The institution goes through a process of reflection upon their weaknesses and strengths Peer Review

10. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Collaborative: improving relations between peers  Open: sharing the results without any restrictive or secret statements  Multidimensional y triangular: incorporating a set of data using a wide range of sources  Ethical: it does not endanger the relations between the institution and their students  Formative: it implies an element of continuous improvement process Peer Review

11. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Research in depth of the 6 areas  Recommendations to develop the case of studies  Methodological handbook as a supporting tool to implement the peer review process Development and results

12. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome Peer review process

13. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Assessing the services and models of the universities taking part in the pilot. Non-commercial consultancy service proposed: Peer review process

14. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  To provide a methodological framework for the developed tools, as a non-commercial service that allows the comparison of the integration of ICT in the 6 proposed areas Pilot Experiences Aim

15. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Documents and data collection:  Documents, files, reports, etc.  Interviews (face to face, telephone, focus group, etc.)  Observation (users, platforms, etc.)  Peer review team:  Work package leader  2 visiting partners  1 host partner Peer Review Process

16. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome  Essential topic: University strategies to integrate ICT in education  Intellectual property rights are related to the areas of University Libraries and Design of online courses  The indicators identified in the area of IPR not very clear  The areas of Training and teachers’ support and Students’ support are closely related  The need of flexibility in applying methodology & tools Partial conclusions

17. ELUE Conference, Mayo 31, 2006, Rome http://www.massive-project.org/