Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEunice Johns Modified over 9 years ago
1
JL. Lerat, C. Falaise LYON - France EFORT Congress (June 2001- Rhodes)
The results of cementless cups (HAP or Ti) with additional divergent pegs and acetabular reconstruction with graft in failed THA The concept of “migration en bloc” (1993) JL. Lerat, C. Falaise LYON - France EFORT Congress (June Rhodes)
2
Special Cup with pegs for revision 1st model : «Spring» ( Landanger-Depuy 1993 - 2000 )
Metallic cup ( Ti ). Hydroxyapatite coating 6 holes for 6 pegs fixed with the cup by threading Alumine on polyethylene
3
1rst model (alumine on polyethylene) : 128 cases
6 divergent pegs bring usually a good primary stability : 10 and 15 mm (in the majority of the cases) or 20, 25, 30 mm
4
The most frequent cause of revision is cemented cups with bone defects corresponding to the amount of cement: 91 cases
5
Revision of non-cemented cups : 29 cases
6
Revision of cemented acetabular rings previously used for revision : 4 cases
7
Material 128 acetabular revisions (11 infected) 75 complete revisions
Previous operations : 1 to 8 Previous surgery : 9.8 ± 5 years Females : 88 Mean age : 64.4 ± 11 Ys Mean follow-up : 4.6 y ± 1.7 (1 to 7 y) One surgeon, one technique
8
Acetabular reconstruction
} 93 % Iliac crest autograft : Bone from reaming : Opposite femoral head : 1 Simple prolongation of the posterior incision
9
Acetabular reconstruction
} 93 % Iliac crest autograft : Bone from reaming : Opposite femoral head : 1 + Allograft : 1 femoral head : 43 2 femoral heads : 3 femoral heads : + bone substitute : } 38 % Iliac crest is grafted : 38 cases
10
Prolongation of the posterior approach toward the posterior iliac crest
11
Prolongation of the posterior approach toward the posterior iliac crest
Preservation of the vascularisation and inervation of the muscle
12
Prolongation of the posterior approach toward the posterior iliac crest
Preservation of the vascularisation and inervation of the muscle
13
Prolongation of the posterior approach toward the posterior iliac crest
Preservation of the vascularisation and inervation of the muscle
14
Paprosky : Type I (n = 31) Easy cases : graft into the holes, sufficient contact of the cup with the host bone
15
Paprosky : Type II (n = 63) A (n = 20) B (n = 22) C (n = 21)
The cup may be stabilised between the 2 columns Press-fitting the acetabular component is often possible 1 iliac crest is sufficient
16
Paprosky : Type II (n = 63) - Autograft into the holes and for the roof reconstruction - Bone is impacted with the « trial cup » - Stabilisation by press-fitting the cup between the 2 columns + 6 pegs
17
Paprosky : Type III (n = 32)
III A (n = 22) III B (n = 10) Massive bone graft is necessary for the reconstruction of : - the centre - the columns - the roof
18
The reconstruction of a column is made after the cup has been fixed to the host bone and to the graft 1 - Fixation of the component with pegs 2 - Spongious autograft is placed on the HAP coating 3 - The bone block is then fitted on the cup by 1 or 2 pegs (or 1 adjusting srew) inside outside
19
The use of screws is not recommended usualy
Adjusting screws may be used to fit the graft against the cup Or for the primary stabilisation of the cup It is recommended to replace the screws by pegs for definitive fixation
20
Stability of the implants
Press-fit alone : 45 Stability attained by the use of pegs : 83 The divergent pegs bring a complementary stability to cup
21
Stability of the implants
6 years The stabilisation of the cup is obtained with graft incorporation and remodelling under load-bearing conditions
22
Weight load-bearing Immediate (partial) : 25 4 to 6 weeks : 48 2 to 3 months : 55
23
Complications Dislocations (2 first months) : 9
Trochanteric non-unions : 6 (4 had previous non-unions) Ossifications : Infections : (recurrence for 3 of 11 previous infections)
24
Operation Cup + stem 75 cases Cup alone 53 cases
Blood loss : 1075 ml ± ( ) Drainage : ml ± ( ) Op time : min ± (90-345) Cup alone cases Blood loss : 645 ml ± ( ) Drainage : ml ± ( ) Op time : min ± (90-300)
25
Diameter of the cups Cases Removed cups : 49.6 mm + cement New cups :
26
Removed cups : 49.6 mm + cement New cups : 55.9 mm Cement Bone graft
The mean diameter of the new cups increases, but the cement is replaced by bone graft Cement Bone graft
27
Evaluation Radiographic measurements Functional value
Incorporation /radio lucent line Stability in the 3 planes - Numerised X-rays - Precise measurements (special software : “MetrOs” C. Falaise) Functional value PMA Score (Postel - Merle d'Aubigné)
28
Lost for follow-up : 3 Deceased : 8 Revisions : 11
Loosening : 9 Infection : 2 Patients reviewed : 102
29
Results 16.4 ± 2 / 18 Postel-Merle d’Aubigné score (18 pts)
16.4 ± 2 / 18 Excellent : 69 Good : Fair: Poor : Impossible to estimate : 27 The results are also influenced by the status of the femur
30
Results The results are good for the 3 types of Paprosky
31
Results Complete healing : 94 Pain at the iliac crest : 3
Poor active abduction : 22
32
Radio lucencies None : 87.7 % Zone I : 3.3 Zone II : 1.6
Zone III : Zone I,II : Zone II,III : 1.6 Zone I,II,III : 1.6
33
Radiological results manual measurements (Failed cases included)
86 % of the implants are stable at visual examination no migration, no radio-lucent line Vertical migration 2 to 6 mm : 3 > 6 mm : Medial migration 2 to 4 mm : 2 > 4 mm : Verticalisation : 5.5 % Important displacement : 7 cases Revised by the same cup : 5
34
Computerised measurements
Scanner Vidar Definition : 150 Dot per inch Selection 1 Pixel : 0.17 mm Special software «MètrOs» (C. FALAISE) Navigation into the image with magnification Adjustment of the luminosity and contrast Scale adapted to the size of the implants Geometric constructions and calculation of index automatically « EBRA » method (Krismer - Innsbruck) 6 index (3 longitudinal, 3 transversal) 11 measurements Accuracy : 0.7 mm
35
Computerised measurements Scale adapted to the size of the implants
36
Computerised measurements 1) Ascension (1st measurement)
37
Computerised measurements Ascension (2d measurement)
38
Computerised measurements 2) Lateralisation 1
39
Computerised measurements Lateralisation 2
40
Computerised measurements 3) Inclination
41
Computerised measurements 4) Version
sin(a) = Rp/Rc a = sin-1(Rp/Rc)
42
« EBRA » method Krismer et coll. 1995 (Innsbruck)
Control of mistakes due to incidence variations Comparability of 2 films by measuring the position of constant anatomical landmarks Difference in size = Comparability Index For an index limited to 3 mm, the precision is ± 0.7 mm for the experimental model and ± 1 mm in clinical study
43
Comparability of 2 films by measuring the position of constant anatomical landmarks
6 index (3 longitudinal, 3 transversal) Longitudinal L1 - 2
44
Comparability of 2 films by measuring the position of constant anatomical landmarks
6 index (3 longitudinal, 3 transversal) Longitudinal L2 - 3
45
Comparability of 2 films by measuring the position of constant anatomical landmarks
6 index (3 longitudinal, 3 transversal) Transversal M1 - 2
46
Comparability of 2 films by measuring the position of constant anatomical landmarks
6 index (3 longitudinal, 3 transversal) Transversal M 2 - 3
47
Computerised measurements
Inclination and anteversion of the cups Post-op Inclination : 49° ± 7,5 Anteversion : 17.1° ± 9.9 Follow-up : 4 years Inclination : 48.7° ± 9.8 Anteversion : 19.5° ± 12.4
48
Computerised measurements
Position of the cup / U ligne Position of the cup / U Hip centre correct : 43 %
49
Migrations Migrations = 45 % with computerised measurements
= 14 % visual method (migrations > 3mm) Literature : maxi 9 % Callaghan 9 % 4 years (JBJS 1985) Kavanagh 9 % 4.5 years (JBJS 1985) EBRA is the best method to detect migrations (except RSA : roentgen stereophotogrammetry) Ilchmann T. J. Arthroplasty 1992
50
Post op 6 months Stable after 1 year
1 example of verticalisation and ascencion Post op months Stable after 1 year
51
Stable Migration Total
type type 2A type 2B type 2C type 3A type 3B
52
Postop 1 year The stability of a cup is achieved by bone remodeling.
We consider that a small migration is a normal phenomena (proved by computerised measurements) Postop year Consequences of migation when using screws = wear or screw fracture
53
Mobility between the cup and the screws has consequences :
Impression in the polyethylene ± metallic wear ± fractures of the screws
54
The concept of “migration en bloc”
The pegs tend to limit the migration of the cup but should this occur, they migrate together in the same direction
55
Failed revision Successfull revision Only 3 pegs with 6 pegs
5 cups placed with screws failed and they had been revised with a similar cup with pegs Failed revision Successfull revision Only 3 pegs with 6 pegs + 5 years
56
5 years 5 ans
57
5 years
58
6 years
59
13 infected cases Two-steps revision
3 recurences of infection finally healed
60
The limits of this cup Type 4 Destruction of the roof and 2 columns
+ destruction of inferior bone
61
What can we do for large defects « type 4 » ?
Failure of a 1rst revision using a cemented ring (Kerboul) Protrusio (6 years later)
63
Granuloma + cement
64
The host bone and the cancellous bone graft cannot find any possibility of ingrowht on this surface
65
Wagner’s acetabular ring for revision and massive bone graft
Ti-6Al-7Nb Protasul TM Cementless and metal on metal
66
A part of a femoral head is placed in the defect
67
Cortico-spongious blocks to reconstruct the columns and the roof
68
Spongious morsellised bone (auto and allo graft) cover the precedent graft
69
The Wagner ’s ring is impacted and fixed with screws
70
heads + 80 cc of morsellised bone graft
Acetabular reconstruction with 3 femoral heads + 80 cc of morsellised bone graft
71
The new Wagner’s ring (for type 4)
2 advantages : cementless ( Ti coating for bony integration ) and metal on metal 1 drawback : Migration is bound to happen ( problem with the screws) pegs for future ??
72
Some examples of « Spring » cup
Failure of other kinds of revision rings
73
4 years Failure of other kinds of revision rings
74
Op. 5 4 previous operations Op. 2 Op. 3 Op. 4 1 iliac crest +
1 femoral head Face + 5 ans
75
Op. 5 1 iliac crest + 1 femoral head
7 years Op iliac crest + 1 femoral head
76
The polyethylene debris are responsible for the loosening of the THA
Foreign bodies Granulomas
77
Acetabular reconstruction is often associated with femoral problems
79
Polyethylene and metal-back must be eradicated
80
Polyethylene must be replaced by better materials
Alumina on alumina Alumine - alumine Alumine - polyéthylène Metal on metal Zircone - zircone
81
- Ti-6Al-7Nb Protasul Cup with pegs 2d generation
(Cedior-Sulzer) - Ti-6Al-7Nb Protasul - 7 pegs - Metal / metal (metasul) 54 cases (since 6/2000)
82
11 months Follow-up < 1 year
84
Conclusions 10 m Incorporation-stability of the cup :
success rate : 96 % in types 1,2,3 (follow-up : 1 to 7 years) Restoration of bony structures : autograft ++ or auto + allograft
85
Conclusions Usefulness of non cemented cups (HAP or Ti)
Interest of the pegs fixed to the cup Pegs are preferable to screws Pegs do not interfere with small migration during osteo-integration
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.