1. ... for our health Mark Remiker, MA: Peggy O'Halloran, MPH: Michael Grasmick, PhD; Frederick Curro, MD; Paul Smith, MD Wisconsin Research and Education Network and the University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine Acute pain treatment by physicians and dentists: Results from a WREN/PEARL collaborative survey

2. WREN Wisconsin Research and Education Network Founded in 1987 130 Clinics 20 Healthcare organizations 37 communities

3. PEARL Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning NIH-sponsored network of private-practice dentists Launched in 2005 at NYU College of Dentistry Over 200 Practitioner-Investigators in 32 states 16 studies are ongoing or completed, with almost 6,000 subjects enrolled

4. Background & Significance common both in dentistry and primary care very little literature on prevalence in primary care physician attitudes poorly described in literature no literature to support the anecdotal link of attitudes to prescriptions given and adequacy of pain relief Acute Pain:

5. Collaborative Aim Describe the attitudes and practices related to the treatment of acute pain and any differences between primary care clinicians and dentists through electronic survey. - Descriptive analysis - Hypothesis generation

6. Survey Group Members –Simple online registration –Respond to at least 80% –Responses inform WAFP board how you feel about the issue in question Surveys –Address issues important to primary care –12 or less a year –Take approximately 5 minutes

7. Methods: the sample Table 1: Sample demographics WREN Doctors PEARL Dentists Both N79145224 Age (SD)47.4 (9.8)50.25 (10.03)49.3 (10.04) Years Practicing (SD) 17.3 (10.1)20.96 (9.6)19.48 (9.8) Sex (M/F)37/31103/42140/73

8. Method: Survey 2 (general attitudes) - How often do you use the following treatment options for acute orofacial pain? –Education –Medication –Referrals - Drugs commonly prescribed? –NSAIDS –Opioids –Muscle relaxants - Attitudes toward prescribing opioids

9. Methods: Survey 1 (Scenarios) Scenario 1 (TRAUMA) A 25 year old male with no known medication allergies slipped on the ice while carrying a package and fell hitting his face on the curb about 12 hours ago. He did not lose consciousness, but he has facial bruises, swelling and broke off part of an incisor. He put the ice on the injury when he got home last night because of the pain. He took Ibuprofen 600mg every 6 hours and it “helps some,” but he woke up twice last night because of the pain. He has an angular fracture with no pulpal exposure and approximately 1/3 of the incisal edge is gone. You do not suspect any bone fractures. –Scenario 1: TRAUMA –Prescription: Ibuprofen 600 mg/6 hours –Effective: SOME

10. Methods: Survey 1 (Scenarios) Scenario 2 (SINUSITUS) A 23 year old woman with no known medication allergies presents with right maxillary tooth pain, a two week history of gradual improving upper respiratory symptoms, but worsening facial pressure and pain for the past 10 days. She took some Claritin D 24 hours which did not help much. You make a clinical diagnosis of right maxillary sinusitis. –Scenario 2: SINUSITUS –Prescription: Ibuprofen 600 mg/6 hours –Effective: NO

11. Methods: Survey 1 (Scenarios) Scenario 3 (ABSCESS) A 43 year old female with no known medication allergies has had a right lower mandibular pain intermittently for 2 weeks. She has developed swelling and increasing pain the last 3 days inadequately controlled with acetaminophen 500 mg every 4 hours. She woke up 4 times last night and is in obvious distress. You make a diagnosis of tooth abscess. –Scenario 3: ABSCESS –Prescription: acetaminophen 50 mg/4 hours –Effective: NO

12. Methods: Survey 1 (Scenarios) Post-scenario questions –Any non-medication treatments? –Would you recommend a medication? Name Dose Instructions Prescription? –Medication 2?

13. Preliminary Results Correlation Matrix AgeYears Practicing TraumaSinusitisAbscessTotal Agex Years Practicing 0.89*x Trauma0.01-0.04x Sinusitis-0.010.0010.21*x Abscess-0.07 0.33*0.05x Total0.00-0.020.72*0.67*0.61*x * = p < 0.000

14. Preliminary Results Med Recommendation: Trauma DoctorDentistTotal No133447 Yes65108173 Total78142220 Pearson Chi2 = 1.59 p = 0.21

15. Scenario 1: Trauma First Med Recommendation –Scenario 1: TRAUMA –Prescription: Ibuprofen 600 mg/6 hours –Effective: SOME

16. Preliminary Results Med Recommendation: Sinusitis DoctorDentistTotal No45155 Yes7287159 Total76138214 Pearson chi2 = 25.78 p < 0.00

17. Scenario 2: Sinusitis First Med Recommendation –Scenario 2: SINUSITUS –Prescription: Ibuprofen 600 mg/6 hours –Effective: NO

18. Preliminary Results Med Recommendation: Abscess DoctorDentistTotal No246 Yes73135208 Total75139214 Pearson chi2 = 0.008 p = 0.93

19. Scenario 3: Abscess First Med Recommendation –Scenario 3: ABSCESS –Prescription: acetaminophen 50 mg/4 hours –Effective: NO

20. Preliminary Results Prescribing opioids across scenarios NoYesTotal Doctor413576 Dentist10336139 Total14471215 Pearson chi2 = 9.028 p = 0.003

21. Summary of preliminary findings Individuals who prescribe more for one ailment are likely to prescribe more for others. Dentists less likely than doctors to prescribe for sinus infection Dentists more likely than doctors to avoid prescribing opioids

22. Limitations - Sample size - Sex ratio - Exploratory analyses - Attitudes only, not behaviors - Analyses do not speak to a effectiveness

23. Future Directions 1. Analyze the rest of survey 1 and the entire 2 nd survey 2. What methods are most effective? 3. What are the patients attitudes?

24. Thank you - Questions? Comments? Did anyone generate any Hypotheses? - WREN/PEARL survey takers - PEARL group: Van P. Thompson, Don Vena, Frederick Naftolin, Matthew Buchholz - WREN group: Hannah Louks - National Institute of Health