Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byArthur Tucker Modified over 9 years ago
1
Flunarizine for migraine prophylaxis Steven Elliot GPwSI NHS Salford
2
Content Pharmacology Indications for use Contra-indications Adverse effects Evidence base Prescribing issues
3
Pharmacokinetics Readily absorbed Steady state after 5-6 weeks Wide distribution Lipophyllic Binds strongly to protein Dissolves poorly in water Crosses blood brain barrier Metabolised in liver with first pass effect Half life 7-10days
4
Mechanism of action Non selective Calcium antagonist Anti dopaminergic H1 antihistamine (Stabilizers vasomoticity) Raises excitatory threshold in CSD Protects against hypoxia Reduces epileptic neuronal activity Effect on Calmodulin
5
Indications Prophylaxis of migraine Symptomatic treatment of dizziness (Peripheral vascular disease) (Alternating hemiplegia) (Epilepsy adjuvant)
6
Contra-indications Parkinson’s disease History of EP syndromes History of depression Breast feeding (Pregnancy) Caution Elderly Hepatic disease
7
Adverse effects Weight gain Sedation Depression EP syndrome (de Melo-Souza syndrome) Headache/insomnia/asthenia/GI
8
Interactions Alcohol Hypnotics /tranquilizers COC Anticholinergics Anticonvulsants
9
P. Louis, Headache 1980 21:235-239, Belgium general practice 3month double blind no crossover 10mg v placebo 58 patients 57% v 14% reduction migraine attacks (3.5 to 2 cf 3.5 to 3 in placebo) More marked in month 3
10
C. Frenken Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1984 Vol 86 Pt 1 17-20 Netherlands primary care 35 patients 12 weeks 10mg v placebo 75% reduction in active v 31% placebo
11
G. Mendenopoulous Cephalalgia 1985 ;5:31-7 Greek secondary care 20 patients Placebo v 10mg 3-4 months 50% reduction v 30% increase in placebo
12
PS Sorenson Cephalalgia 1986 ;6:7-14. Danish secondary care 29 patients Double blind crossover trial 16 weeks treatment period 10mg v placebo 50% reduction in migraine frequency in last 4 weeks (15% placebo)
13
M. Thomas Headache 31:613-615, 1991 India 29 patients (14 dropped out) 6months double blind crossover 10mg v placebo No decrease in migraine frequency Reduced duration and severity
14
HC Deiner et al Cephalalgia 2002;22:209-221 808 patients Double blind 16 week treatment phase 10mg(5days/week) v 5mg v Propranolol 160mg Responders (50% reduction) 5mg:46%. 10mg:53%. Propranolol:48% Drop out due to adverse effects 5mg:16.7%. 10mg: 19.3%. Propranolol:16.7%
15
HC Deiner et al J Neurol 2004;251:943-950 176 patients Topiramate 100mg v Topiramate 200mg v Propranolol 160mg v Placebo Responders: Placebo 23% TPM 100mg 37% TPM 200mg 35% Propranolol 43%
16
Sorensen PS Headache 31:650-655 1991 149 patients Double blind 10mg v Metoprolol 200mg 16weeks treatment phase Both 37% reduction migraine days /month 8% depression cf 3% with Metoprolol
17
Legal Not licensed for use in UK Named patient basis Best option for patient Clinician/pharmacist take responsibility Complex procedure
18
Pharmacist’s duties Make clinician aware unlicensed Use licensed preparation first Demonstrate best interest of patient Benefits outweigh risks Informed consent Keep records for 5 years PILS
19
Experience of use Dr Nick Silver, Walton Centre Written and verbal advise Stop if drowsy Watch for mood change Does not use with beta-blockers Uses 5-15mg Reserves for refractory patients/prolonged aura/hemiplegic aura/severe migrainous vertigo
21
Questions Should we offer it at all? If use which patient groups? Is there a specific role in hemiplegic migraine or migraine with prolonged aura? Should BASH develop a guideline?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.