Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Coase Theorem The initial allocation of legal rights and liabilities will not get in the way of the efficient allocation of resources Where parties to.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Coase Theorem The initial allocation of legal rights and liabilities will not get in the way of the efficient allocation of resources Where parties to."— Presentation transcript:

1 Coase Theorem The initial allocation of legal rights and liabilities will not get in the way of the efficient allocation of resources Where parties to a transaction are fully informed about the consequences of alternatives Where parties to a transaction can bargain freely and costlessly AND Where parties to a transaction can monitor and enforce compliance with contracts costlessly

2 That Means: IT ITIt doesn’t matter who owns what, the person who can use IT best (measured in terms of willingness and ability to pay) will end up with IT It doesn’t matter who is responsible for the design, manufacture, or sale of a product, its attributes will be efficient

3 It Doesn’t Mean: That the distribution of income or wealth will be the same regardless of the prior distribution of rights and liabilities assets or rights liabilities or obligations (The distribution of income or wealth after a transaction depends on the distribution of wealth (assets or rights minus liabilities or obligations) prior to the transaction)

4

5

6

7 Solution Annualized Cost of Spark arrester = $3000 Annualized Cost of Fire Damage = $4500

8 Annualized Cost of Spark arrester = $3000 Annualized Cost of Fire Damage = $1500 Does it Matter who is Liable for damages? NO

9 What Happens if Railroad is Liable? If fire damage = $4500, Railroad Co. buys spark arresterIf fire damage = $4500, Railroad Co. buys spark arrester If fire damage = $1500, Railroad Co. pays damages to farmersIf fire damage = $1500, Railroad Co. pays damages to farmers

10 What Happens if Farmer is Liable? If fire damage = $4500, farmer buys spark arrester for Railroad Co.If fire damage = $4500, farmer buys spark arrester for Railroad Co. If fire damage = $1500, farmer stands ready to put out fires caused by trainIf fire damage = $1500, farmer stands ready to put out fires caused by train

11 Moral Hazard (term comes from insurance industry) The WASTEFUL behavior induced when people do not bear the full consequences of their actions IN THE TRAIN/FARMER EXAMPLE, WHICH ASSIGNMENT OF LIABILITY WAS MORE LIKELY TO CREATE A MORAL HAZARD? Farmer or Railroad Co.?

12 Asymmetric Information Costs Search cost -- the cost of obtaining full knowledge of the THING being transacted including the consequences of its use and its alternativesSearch cost -- the cost of obtaining full knowledge of the THING being transacted including the consequences of its use and its alternatives Bargaining cost -- the cost of reaching a mutually satisfactory contractBargaining cost -- the cost of reaching a mutually satisfactory contract Monitoring and enforcement costs -- the cost of insuring compliance with contractual termsMonitoring and enforcement costs -- the cost of insuring compliance with contractual terms

13 In the information asymmetries, market incentives together with either public provision of information or — in the case of information asymmetries — reassignment of liability, public certification, or enforced disclosure will often produce more efficient outcomes than will a regulatory program that restricts the range of goods and services made available, enforces maintenance standards, or establishes maximum levels of exposure to health and safety hazards. Where participants in private market transactions err only because information is absent, public provision of information will be more efficient than regulation. This follows from the observation that public provision of information can meet economic objectives without removing alternatives from the market that some consumers or workers would prefer.

14 Kinds of Product Liability (all theories of product liability require the injury to be related to product use -- reflect changing reality about who is best located to make knowlegeable choices about net benefits) Caveat EmptorCaveat Emptor NegligenceNegligence Strict LiabilityStrict Liability –Voluntary and knowing assumption of the risk (known and avoidable danger) –Contributory negligence (not just misuse) –Disclaimers Absolute LiabilityAbsolute Liability

15 Damages (no right without a remedy) Economic Losses (replacement cost, out of pocket expenses)Economic Losses (replacement cost, out of pocket expenses) Compensation for Pain and SufferingCompensation for Pain and Suffering Punitive DamagesPunitive Damages

16 Regulatory Optimum


Download ppt "Coase Theorem The initial allocation of legal rights and liabilities will not get in the way of the efficient allocation of resources Where parties to."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google