1. Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 INCAPACITATION AND REPLACEMENT OF SENIOR CABIN CREW MEMBERS Presentation to OST 29 November 2005

2. Safety Regulation Group Slide 2 BACKGROUND  JAA received enquiries as to interpretation  Working Paper produced Identified information in different areas Possible to misinterpret Could lead to non-compliance

3. Safety Regulation Group Slide 3 BACKGROUND  OST tasked Cabin Crew Steering Group to produce material  Discussed at CCSG 05-3  Draft NPA produced

4. Safety Regulation Group Slide 4 RIA  Purpose – no misinterpretation  Options – adoption or rejection  Impacts No impact on those who comply Possible commercial and financial impact on those that do not

5. Safety Regulation Group Slide 5 SUMMARY  Ensure clarification and standardisation between NAA’s  Enhance flight safety  Allow flexibility in exceptional circumstances

6. Safety Regulation Group Slide 6 TEXT PROPOSAL  JAR-OPS 1.1000 Senior cabin crew members (d)  Insert additional sentence This shall only be permitted for one sector and only from an aerodrome where standby cabin crew are not normally available.

7. Safety Regulation Group Slide 7 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  WP also required clarification for ‘replacement’  Discussed by the CCSG  Not included in NPA Possible significant cost implication Not practical for small operators

8. Safety Regulation Group Slide 8 JAR-OPS 1.990  Recent query regarding reduction of cabin crew below minimum required  Industrial action or sickness  Appropriate to include similar requirement in 1.990?