1. CITATION & AUTHORITY QUIZ

2. You are writing a legal memo on a federal child support issue
You are writing a legal memo on a federal child support issue. You find a United States Code published in 2009, with a title number of 18. The section you are citing is called “Failure to pay legal child support obligations.” The section is What is the correct cite format?
18 U.S.C. 228.
18 U.S.C. § 228.
18 U.S.C. 228 (2009).
18 U.S.C. § 228 (2009).
:88

3. BB Rule
See Bluebook Rule 12 – Statutes

4. Norman v. Buckner, 135 U.S. 500 (U.S. 1890).
You need to cite a United States Supreme Court case from the year The plaintiff is Saul Norman and the defendant is Aaron Buckner. You are citing from the first page of the case and this is the first time you have cited this case in your writing. Which cite is correct?
Norman v. Buckner, 135 U.S. 500 (U.S. 1890).
Norman v. Buckner, 135 U.S. 500, 500 (1890).
Norman v. Buckner, 135 U.S. 500 (1890).
Saul Norman v. Aaron Buckner, 135 U.S. 500, 500 (1890).
:86

5. BB Rule
See Bluebook Rule 3.2 – first page of a source

6. Id. at 501 and 502. Id. at 521-2. Id. at 501-02. Id. at 521-22.
Same case information as above but time you want to use a short-form citation for text found on pages 521 to 522 of the court’s opinion. The full cite is right above. How should you cite this?
Id. at 501 and 502.
Id. at
Id. at
Id. at
:87

7. BB Rule
See Bluebook Rule 4.1 – Short Form Citations – “Id.”

8. Participant Scores

9. Which answer lists the sources of law in correct hierarchical order?
Common law, statutes, regulations and constitution
Constitution, statutes, common law, and regulations
Regulations, common law, statutes, and constitution
Common law, constitution, statutes, and regulations
:24

10. The legislature works directly with:
Common law or cases
Regulations
Statutes
Constitution
:30

11. With statutes, the legislature can:
Codify common law
Modify common law
Reject common law
All of the above
:30

12. Can the legislature overturn a court’s decision that a statute is unconstitutional?
Yes No
Maybe
:30

13. Is a court required to follow an agency’s guidance for or interpretation of a statute?
Yes, always
Yes but only when the interpretation is from a federal agency
No but deference given when the agency has authority to act and its interpretation is rational and sound
None of the above
:30

14. Participant Scores

15. You are writing a legal memo regarding a federal consumer credit issue
You are writing a legal memo regarding a federal consumer credit issue. Your supervisor tells you this is a statutory question. Decide whether each listed source is mandatory or persuasive authority or primary versus secondary authority (depending on the question). The Federal Consumer Credit Act:
Primary
Secondary
:30

16. Explanation
Primary authority: includes documents like case decisions, statutes and regulations
Secondary authority encompasses basically everything else, including: law review articles, restatements, treatises, commentary, etc. 

17. The Federal Consumer Credit Act:
Mandatory
Persuasive
:30

18. Explanation
Mandatory authority - primary sources that courts must follow or apply, such as the relevant constitution, statute and case.
Persuasive authority – a decision that a court may adopt but does not have to follow

19. A treatise on consumer credit:
Primary
Secondary
:30

20. Explanation
Secondary authority encompasses basically everything else, including: law review articles, restatements, treatises, commentary, etc. 

21. Mandatory and Secondary Persuasive and Primary Mandatory and Primary
John Doe v. Sam Houston, a decision from the highest court in the state that addresses the consumer credit issue:
Mandatory and Secondary
Persuasive and Primary
Mandatory and Primary
Persuasive and Secondary
:45

22. Explanation
Since this is a federal issue, a case decided by the highest state court is persuasive, non-binding authority. Also, since it is case law, it is primary authority.

23. Your case, involving a breach of contract issue, is at the appellate level in state court. You find a decision by a trial court in the same state, Lowes v. Home Depot, and the facts, reasoning and holding line up directly with your case. This case is:
Mandatory
Persuasive
:45

24. Explanation
The case is persuasive because it is a decision from a lower court on this state court issue. An on-point decision from the highest court in the state would be mandatory authority.

25. Which of the following is not a part of the general structure of a statute?
Definition
Holding
Operative Rule
Exceptions
Defenses
:20

26. Participant Scores Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3
Participant 1
Participant 2
Participant 3
Participant 4
Participant 5

27. Select the correct citation format for the following sources
Select the correct citation format for the following sources. Follow the rules for legal documents. Section of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, all of which appears in the 2005 pocket part
Haw. Rev. Stat. § (Supp. 2005).
Haw. Stat (2005).
Rev. Haw. Stat. § 328(79) (2005).
Haw Rev Stat § (Supp. 2005).
:120

28. BB Rules B6.1.2—state statutes 12.3.1(b)—title, chapter and volume
T.1 Hawaii
B13—typeface
3.1(c) and (2)—supplement information

29. The eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States
Constitution XI
US Const. amend. XI
U.S. Const. amend. XI
11 Const. amend.
:45

30. BB Rules
11 and T.16—subdivisions of the constitution
B7--typeface

31. Section 1(d)(1) of title 15 of the current United States Code, published in This section appears in its entirety in the 2003 Supplement III.
15 U.S.C. § 1 (Supp. 2003).
15 USC § 1(d)(1) (Supp. 2003).
15 U.S.C. s. 1(d)(1) (Supp. 2003).
15 U.S.C. § 1(d)(1) (Supp. 2003).
:60

32. BB Rules B6.1.1, 12.2.1, 12.3.1 & T.1 Federal—US Code format
3.1 & —supplement information

33. Texaco, Incorporated, versus Fouad N. Dagher
Texaco, Incorporated, versus Fouad N. Dagher. This is a February 28, 2006 case from the united States Supreme Court. This case is not yet published in the reporter. However, this case I available on FindLaw at
Texaco, Inc. v. Dagher (Feb. 28, 2006), available at
Texaco, Inc. v. Dagher, at
Texaco, Inc. v. Dagher (Feb. 28, 2006),
Texaco, Incorporated v. Dagher (Feb. 28, 2006), available at
:120

34. BB Rules B13, T6, B51.1(ii) and (v), 10.2.1(g) & 10.2.2—party names
10.5(a)—year of decision
18.2.2(a)—parallel internet cite

35. In a Motion for Summary Judgment, you wish to cite to paragraph 3 of the Plaintiff’s Original Complaint
(Compl. § 3.)
(Orig. Compl. ¶ 3.)
(Original Compl. ¶ 3.)
(Original Compl. § 3.)
:60

36. BB Rules
B10.2—parentheses
BT.1—abreviations
B10.3—pinpoint reference

37. In an appellate brief, you wish to cite to Defendant’s Exhibit 72.
(D’s Exh. 72.)
(Def.’s Ex. 72.)
(Defendant’s 72.)
(Defendant’s Exh. 72.)
:60

38. BB Rules B10.2—parentheses information BT.1—abbreviations
B10.3—pinpoint reference

39. In your brief you are citing a rule concerning prohibitions on political activities applicable to attorneys and staff attorneys of the Legal Services Corporation. The rule is found in title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, at section The current volume of title 45 was published in 2005.
C.F.R. 45 s (2005).
45 CFR § (2005).
45 C.F.R. § (2005).
45 C.F.R. s (2005).
:60

40. BB Rule
14.2(a)—code of federal regulations and parentheticals

41. An article entitled “Punitive Damages,” by John J
An article entitled “Punitive Damages,” by John J. Kircher, found on page 971 of volume 6 of the Tennessee Law Review, published in 2000.
John J. Kircher, Punitive Damages, 6 Tenn. L. Rev. 971 (2000).
Kircher, Punitive Damages, 6 Tenn. Law Rev. 971 (2000).
J. Kircher, Punitive Damages, 6 Tenn. L. Rev. 971 (2000).
Punitive Damages, 6 Tenn. L. Rev. 971 (2000).
:120

42. BB Rules 16.1—author’s name B13 & 16.2—title
16.2 & T.13—pinpoint and periodical abbreviation
16.3--parenthetical

43. You are citing a United States Supreme Court Case
You are citing a United States Supreme Court Case. The plaintiff is Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania and the defendant is Casey. The case was decided in What is the correct citation format?
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (U.S. 1992).
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (U.S. 1992).
:120

44. BB Rules See T.1 – United States Jurisdictions
See also Rule (f) – Geographical Terms
See also Rule 10.4 – Court and Jurisdiction

45. You need to cite a Federal case
You need to cite a Federal case. The plaintiff is Hoxha and the defendant is Levi. It is a 2006 case found in volume 465 of the Federal Reporter (3rd) from the Third Circuit (Pennsylvania). You are quoting from page 559 of the court’s opinion and this is the first time you have cited this case in your memo. The case starts on page Which cite is correct?
Hoxha v. Levi, 465 F.3d 559 (3d Cir. Pa. 2006).
Hoxha v. Levi, 465 F.3d 554 (3d Cir. 2006).
Hoxha v. Levi, 465 F.3d 554, 559 (3d Cir. 2006).
Hoxha v. Levi, 465 F.3d 559 (3d. Cir. Pa. 2006)
:120

46. BB Rules See Rule 10.4 Court and Jurisdiction – Federal Courts
Also see Rule 3.2 – Pinpoint cites

47. Participant Scores Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3
Participant 1
Participant 2
Participant 3
Participant 4
Participant 5