1. Margaret K. Mann National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado USA A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power from Biomass, Coal, and Natural Gas

2. Purpose of LCAs conducted System descriptions Biomass IGCC Average coal Coal/biomass cofiring Natural gas combined cycle Comparative Results Energy Greenhouse gases Other air emissions Resource consumption Outline of Presentation

3. Life Cycle Assessment: Definition LCA, in the context of novel systems, is: a systematic analytical method used to quantify the environmental benefits and drawbacks of a process performed on all processes, cradle-to-grave, resource extraction to final disposal ideal for comparing new technologies to the status quo helps to pinpoint areas that deserve special attention reveals unexpected environmental impacts so that research can be focused on mitigating them (no show-stopping surprises)

4. Purpose of Studies Biomass LCA was conducted to answer common questions: What are the net CO 2 emissions? What is the net energy production? Which substances are emitted at the highest rate? What parts of the system are responsible for the greatest impacts? What should biomass R&D focus on? Coal and natural gas LCAs the foundation for quantifying the benefits of biomass power. Direct-fired biomass system describes current biomass power industry. Cofiring LCA examined near-term option for biomass utilization. Each assessment conducted separately - common systems not excluded.

5. Systems Examined Indirectly-heated gasification Dedicated hybrid poplar feedstock Zero carbon sequestration in base case Pulverized coal / steam cycle Illinois #6 coal - moderate sulfur, bituminous Surface mining Biomass IGCC Average coal 15% cofiring by heat input Biomass residue (urban, mostly) into PC boiler 0.9 percentage point efficiency derating Credit taken for avoided operations including decomposition (i.e., no biomass growth) Biomass / coal cofiring Biomass residue Avoided emissions credit as with cofiring Direct-fired biomass Combined cycle Upstream natural gas losses = 1.4% of gross Natural gas

7. elatedto: Flue-gas cleanup TransportationNaturalgas productionor coalmining BiomassIGCC2310%16%N/A Directbiomass1250%49%N/A Coal70235%32%25% Naturalgas0.5%N/A98.3% 1,718

8. Carbon Cycle (GHG Emissions) Example flows: Biomass energy crop - photosynthesis, carbon sequestration in soil Biomass residue - avoided decomposition emissions Coal - coal mine methane, coal mine waste Natural gas- fugitive emissions, leaks General - incomplete combustion, upstream fossil fuel consumption Key question: On a life cycle basis, what are the net greenhouse gas emissions of these systems?

15. -15 -5 5 15 ParticulatesSOxNOxCONMHCs -41 g/kWh Average PC coal 15% Coal / biomass cofiring Direct biomass residue Dedicated biomass IGCC NGCC CH4

16. 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 CoalLimestoneOilNatural Gas Average PC coal 15% cofiring Direct-fired residue biomass Dedicated biomass IGCC NGCC

17. Summary Greenhouse Gases: Biomass IGCC nearly zero net GHGs Average coal system: ~1,000 g CO 2 -equiv/kWh NGCC system: ~500 g CO 2 -equiv/kWh Today’s biomass systems remove GHGs from atmosphere Energy: Coal and natural gas: negative system energy balance Even neglecting the energy content of coal and natural gas, biomass systems are more energy efficient NGCC: natural gas extraction and losses account for 21% of total energy Air emissions: Biomass: few particulates, SO 2, NOx, and methane Coal: upstream CO and NMHC emissions lower NGCC: system methane emissions high Resource consumption: Biomass systems << fossil systems Cofiring: 15% cofiring reduces GWP of coal system by 18% Reduction in emissions, resource consumption, and energy use

18. Credits Co-author: Pamela L. Spath, NREL Funding from the U.S. Department of Energy Biomass Power Program