1. Criminal Law Chapter 7 Parties to Crime and Vicarious Liability
Joel Samaha, 9th Ed.

2. Vicarious Liability When the relationship between two parties
makes one party criminally liable
for another party’s conduct,
e.g., employer-employee, buyer-seller,
corporation-manager, producer-consumer.
Parties to a crime:*
1) Accomplices: participants before and during the commission of crimes.
2) Accessories: participants after crimes are committed.
* At common law, principals in the first degree and principals in the second degree were also included.

3. Accomplices and Accessories
All persons before and during the commission of a crime (accomplices) are prosecuted for the crime itself.
Participation after crimes are committed (accessory liability) is prosecuted as a separate, minor offense - a misdemeanor. For example, an accessory is a person who either harbors or conceals or aids a principal to avoid or escape arrest, trial conviction, or punishment.
What is the difference between an accomplice and a
co-conspirator?

4. Accomplice Actus Reus The actor took “some positive act
in aid of the commission of the offense,”
e.g., providing guns, supplies, or other instruments of crime; serving as a lookout;
driving a getaway car;
preventing warnings from getting to the victim.*
* Words which also may define accomplice actus reus: aid, abet, assist, counsel, procure, hire, or induce.

5. Question Explain the mere presence rule.
What is the exception to the mere presence rule?
In State v. Ulvinen (Minn. 1981), do you agree with the court that however morally reprehensible her behavior,
she nonetheless was not an accomplice?
Defend your answer.

6. Accomplice Mens Rea
“It is the knowledge of the wrongful purpose of the actor plus the encouragement provided by the aider and abettor that makes the later guilty. Although the guilt of the aider and abettor is dependent upon the actor’s crime, the criminal intent of the aider and abettor is presumed from his actions with knowledge of the actor’s wrongful purpose.
(People v. Poplar, 1970)*
What are the facts of the case in People v. Poplar?
* Jurisdictions vary and sometimes are confused as to whether knowledge, recklessness, or negligence qualify.

7. Accessories After the Fact
Accessory is a separate lesser offense than accomplice liability.
Elements of accessory after the fact include:
a. The accessory personally helped the person who committed the felony (actus reus element).
b. The accessory knew a felony was committed (mens rea element).
c. The accessory helped for the purpose of hindering prosecution (mens rea element).
d. Someone other than the accessory actually committed a felony (circumstantial element).
What are the facts and opinion in State v. Chism (436 So.2d 464 (La. 1983)).

8. Questions Why is it difficult to pinpoint vicarious liability
for business crimes?
What is the difference between strict liability
and vicarious liability?*
What are the fact and opinion
in State v. Zeta Chi Fraternity?
(686 A.2d 530 (N.H. 1997))
* Most vicarious liability statutes involve employer-employee relationship (enterprise or corporate vicarious liability).

9. Individual Vicarious Liability
Vicarious liability is strictly created by statute –
there is no common law vicarious liability.
What were the facts and opinion in
State v. Torino (1999)
and
State v. Ackers (1979)

10. Discussion Is it fundamentally fair to base liability on relationship
and not acts and/or intent
in enterprise/corporate vicarious liability cases?
Explain.
Does holding parents responsible
based solely on the parent-child relationship
violate due process?