Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlfred Cook Modified over 9 years ago
1
Monitoring: What, when and how long? George Ntaios University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
2
Disclosures Scholarships: European Stroke Organization; Hellenic Society of Atherosclerosis. Honoraria: Medtronic; Quintiles; Boehringer-Ingelheim. Speaker fees: Sanofi; Boehringer-Ingelheim; Galenica; Bayer. Support for educational events: Bayer; Sanofi-Aventis; Pfizer; Lundbeck; Boehringer- Ingelheim; Galenica; Elpen; Bristol Myers Squibb. Participation in trials: – NAVIGATE-ESUS / National coordinator (Greece) – PRECIOUS / National coordinator (Greece). – ENOS / National coordinator (Greece). – BIOSIGNAL / Principal Investigator (Larissa). – EBBINGHAUS / Principal Investigator (Larissa). – FOURIER / Principal investigator (Larissa). – PREVISE / Principal investigator (Larissa). – GLORIA-AF / Sub-investigator (Larissa).
3
Stroke is an earthquake San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. August 24, 2014 10:20 AM
4
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG
5
Monitor for diagnostic reasons
6
Continuous ECG monitoring vs. Holter Rizos. Stroke 2012; 43:2689-94
7
Continuous monitoring vs. Holter
8
Sanna. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2478-86 CRYSTAL-AF
9
CRYSTAL-AF: the more you look, the more you find Sanna. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2478-86
10
EMBRACE Gladstone. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2467-77
11
EMBRACE : the more you look, the more you find Gladstone. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2467-77
12
Monitor ECG – for how long?
13
Gladstone. Stroke 2015; 46:936-41 Atrial extrasystoles predict AF
14
Gladstone. Stroke 2015; 46:936-41 Atrial extrasystoles predict AF
15
Gladstone. Stroke 2015; 46:936-41 Atrial extrasystoles predict AF
16
Monitor ECG in lacunar strokes ? Sacco. Neurology 2006; 66:1335-8
18
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG Microemboli
19
Monitor for diagnostic reasons
20
Microemboli monitoring
22
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG Microemboli Arterial pressure
23
Monitor Blood Pressure Jorgensen. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;13:204-9
24
Monitor Blood Pressure Vemmos. Journ Intern Med 2004; 255: 257–265
25
Monitor Blood Pressure Sandset. Lancet 2011; 377:741-50
26
Monitor Blood Pressure Sandset. Lancet 2011; 377:741-50
27
Monitor Blood Pressure Sandset. Lancet 2011; 377:741-50
28
Monitor Blood Pressure ENOS. Lancet 2015; 385:617-28
29
Monitor Blood Pressure ENOS. Lancet 2015; 385:617-28
30
ESO Guidelines Cautious BP lowering is recommended in patients with extremely high BPs (>220/120mmHg) (Class IV, GCP) It is recommended that BP of >185/110mmHg lowered before thrombolysis (Class IV, GCP) ESO Guidelines. CVD 2008
31
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG Microemboli Arterial pressure Glucose
32
Monitor glycemia Quinn. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27:148–155
33
Monitor glycemia Previously diagnosed DM Newly diagnosed DM Stress hyperglycemia Fasting Glu ≥ 126 Random Glu ≥ 200 HbA 1c ≥ 6.5% Fasting Glu ≥ 126 Random Glu ≥ 200 HbA 1c < 6.5%
34
Monitor glycemia Ntaios, Michel. Stroke 2010; 41:2366-70
35
Monitor glycemia Gray. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 397–406
36
Monitor glycemia Gray. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 397–406
37
Insulin treatment – functional outcome Ntaios, Papavasileiou, Makaritsis, Michel. Int J Stroke 2013
38
Insulin treatment - mortality Ntaios, Papavasileiou, Makaritsis, Michel. Int J Stroke 2013
39
Insulin treatment - hypoglycemia Ntaios, Papavasileiou, Makaritsis, Michel. Int J Stroke 2013
40
Monitor glycemia https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01369069
41
AHA guidelines Jausch. Stroke 2013 it is reasonable to treat hyperglycemia to achieve blood glucose levels in a range of 140 to 180 mg/dL and to closely monitor to prevent hypoglycemia in patients with acute ischemic stroke (Class IIa; Level of Evidence C).
42
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG Microemboli Arterial pressure Glucose Dysphagia
43
Monitor for dysphagia Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) Videofluoroscopy
44
Monitor for dysphagia
45
ESO guidelines ESO Guidelines. CVD 2008 Swallowing assessment is recommended but there are insufficient data to recommend a specific approach for treatment (Class III, GCP)
46
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG Microemboli Arterial pressure Glucose Dysphagia Temperature
47
Monitor temperature Kakaletsis/Ntaios/Michel. Larissa 2015
48
Monitor temperature
49
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG Microemboli Arterial pressure Glucose Dysphagia Temperature Oxygen
50
ESO guidelines ESO Guidelines. CVD 2008 Intermittent monitoring of oxygen saturation is recommended for 72 h in patients with significant persisting neurological deficits (Class IV, GCP) It is recommended that oxygen should be administered if the oxygen saturation falls <95% (Class IV, GCP)
51
Monitor 0 2 Roffe. Nice 2014
52
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG Microemboli Arterial pressure Glucose Dysphagia Temperature Oxygen Lab tests (CRP, WBC…) Clinically
53
Monitor clinically -Physical examination -Neurological status -NIHSS -yawning -vomit -headache -GCS
54
Why monitor? Monitor Diagnostic reasons Vital signs & complications Response to treatment ECG Microemboli Arterial pressure Glucose Dysphagia Temperature Oxygen Lab tests (CRP, WBC…) Clinically Repeat imaging
55
Stroke unit works Langhorne, Cochrane 2009; CD000197
57
One size does not fit all
58
Take-home messages
59
Free ESO Membership SPECIAL DEAL ! ESOC delegates who are not yet member of the ESO and have paid their conference registration fee can receive free ESO membership for the year 2015. JOIN NOW ! Application forms available at the ESO booth in the exhibition.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.