Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MARC Machine Readable Cataloging & MARC family

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MARC Machine Readable Cataloging & MARC family"— Presentation transcript:

1 MARC Machine Readable Cataloging & MARC family
Reference: Rebecca Guenther (2004) New and traditional descriptive formats in the library environment

2 Timeline comparing creation of MARC to major developments in software, networking, and data representation between 1960 and 1980

3 1. MARC21 Bibliographic Format
MARC s --> USMARC, CANMARC, UKMARC, etc. UNIMARC MARC21 – 1997, Harmonization of USMARC and CAN/MARC Translations in several languages MARC21 Concise Format for Bibliographic Data is available at: MARC21 Formats are available at: Good introduction to the use of MARC: Understanding MARC Bibliographic,

4 MARC 21 Parts of a MARC record
Leader: identifies the beginning of a new record, type of record Directory: think of it as the index to the record. Identifies the position and length of each field Control Fields: coded information about the resource described, standard/control numbers, dates, language, etc. Some are called fixed fields due to their fixed length Variable fields: more detailed description of the recourse, fields have variable length

5 MARC 21 Content designators
Types of codes used to indicate content of a record: tags: 3-digit numbers ( ) to encode fields e.g = personal name main entry indicators: 2 possible positions for each field, special information about that field e.g _ = surname as the entry element subfield codes: combination of a delimiter and a lower case letter or number, to encode subfields e.g _ |a = name

6 MARC21 groups of fields (by hundreds)
Bibliographic format 0XX Control information, numbers, codes 1XX Main entry 2XX Titles, edition, imprint/publication 3XX Physical description, etc. 4XX Series statements (as shown in the book) 5XX Notes 6XX Subject added entries 7XX Added entries other than subject or series 8XX Series added entries (other authoritative forms)

7 Parallels in MARC formats
X00 Personal names X10 Corporate names X11 Meeting names X30 Uniform titles X40 Bibliographic titles X50 Topical terms X51 Geographic names 1XX Main entry 4XX Series statement 6XX Subject heading 7XX Added entry 8XX Series added entries Exercise: If Steve Jobs is the subject of a book, what field number should you use to indicate that "Jobs, Steve, " is the 'subject' of the book? Exercise: If "Apple Computer, Inc." is the subject of a book, what field number should you use to indicate that?

8 2. MARC Family 2.1 MARC XML 2.2 MODS, Metadata Object Description Schema 2.3 MADS, Metadata Authority Description Schema

9 New needs Need to take advantage of XML
Establish standard MARC 21 in an XML structure Need simpler (but compatible) alternatives Development of MODS Need interoperability with different schemas Assemble coordinated set of tools Need continuity with current data Provide flexible transition options

10

11 2.1 MARC 21 evolution to XML

12 MARC 21 in XML – MARCXML XML exact equivalent of MARC (2709) record
MARCXML record XML exact equivalent of MARC (2709) record Lossless/roundtrip conversion to/from MARC 21 record Simple flexible XML schema, no need to change when MARC 21 changes Presentations using XML stylesheets LC provides converters (open source) Adopted by OAI to replace oai_marc

13 Uses of MARCXML and related tools
Standardize MARC 21 across community for XML communication and manipulation Open MARC 21 to XML programming tools and presentation style sheets Standardize MARC 21 for OAI harvesting Standardize transformations to and from other standard formats (DC, ONIX, …) Basis for evolution while maintaining standardization

14 MARC 21 (2709) record (machine view)
00967cam a   931129s wauab eng  a  a (acid-free, recycled paper) :c$14.95 aDLCcDLCcDLC 00aGV1046.G3bG 00a796.6/4/09432201 aSlavinski, Nadine,d1968-10aGermany by bike :b20 tours geared for discovery /cNadine Slavinski. aSeattle, Wash. :bMountaineers,cc1994. a238 p. :bill., maps ;c22 cm. 0aBy bike aIncludes index. 0aBicycle touringzGermanyxGuidebooks. Exercise: Can you explain how a machine can tell where is 100 field which carries the title and responsible body information? (Hint: textbook page 24). Can you explain another chunk of the digit?

15 MARC21 (2709) to MARCXML <record xmlns=" <leader>00967cam a 4500</leader> <controlfield tag="001"> </controlfield> <controlfield tag="005"> </controlfield> <controlfield tag="008">931129s wauab eng </controlfield> <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a"> (acid-free, recycled paper) :</subfield> <subfield code="c">$14.95</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">DLC</subfield> <subfield code="c">DLC</subfield> <subfield code="d">DLC</subfield> <datafield tag="050" ind1="0" ind2="0"> <subfield code="a">GV1046.G3</subfield> <subfield code="b">G </subfield> <datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="0"> <subfield code="a">796.6/4/0943</subfield> <subfield code="2">20</subfield> <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Slavinski, Nadine,</subfield> <subfield code="d">1968-</subfield>

16 MARCXML record (continued)
What does this set tell you? <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"> <subfield code="a">Germany by bike :</subfield> <subfield code="b">20 tours geared for discovery /</subfield> <subfield code="c">Nadine Slavinski.</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Seattle, Wash. :</subfield> <subfield code="b">Mountaineers,</subfield> <subfield code="c">c1994.</subfield> <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">238 p. :</subfield> <subfield code="b">ill., maps ;</subfield> <subfield code="c">22 cm.</subfield> <datafield tag="440" ind1=" " ind2="0"> <subfield code="a">By bike</subfield> <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Includes index.</subfield> <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0"> <subfield code="a">Bicycle touring</subfield> <subfield code="z">Germany</subfield> <subfield code="x">Guidebooks.</subfield> </record> What does this set tell you?

17 MARCXML to DC <rdf:Description xmlns:rdf=" xmlns:dc=" <dc:title>Germany by bike : 20 tours geared for discovery </dc:title> <dc:creator>Slavinski, Nadine, 1968-</dc:creator> <dc:type>text</dc:type> <dc:publisher>Seattle, Wash. : Mountaineers, </dc:publisher> <dc:date>c1994.</dc:date> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:subject>Bicycle touring</dc:subject> </rdf:Description>

18 2.2 MODS Metadata Object Description Schema
Bibliographic element set Initiative of the Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress Uses XML Schema Specifically for library applications, although could be used more widely A derivative (and subset) of MARC elements Element set: list of elements that can be used; list that must be used; other standards/policies define levels Semantics=meaning of fields Syntax: defines Leader, Directory, tags, indicator structure AACR2-- traditional use, now broadened Other metadata conent standards can use MARC (e.g. archival rules)

19 Why MODS? XML based, web friendly, transportable, processible, configurable, sufficiently descriptive without being too complex, extensible Benefits over MARC: MARC isn’t XML based and can’t easily be output from web forms. Requires special “cataloging” knowledge and systems to implement Investigating XML as a new more flexible syntax for MARC element set

20 Why MODS? (cont.) Need for rich hierarchical descriptive metadata in XML but simpler than full MARC, especially for complex digital library objects Benefits over Dublin Core: DC doesn’t have sufficient specificity. DC doesn’t specify a syntax and is inconsistently applied. DC isn’t extensible Need compatibility with existing library descriptions

21 Features of MODS Uses language-based tags
Elements generally inherit semantics of MARC MODS does not assume the use of any specific cataloging code Reuse element descriptions throughout schema Not intended to be round-trippable Not intended to be a MARC replacement

22 MODS high-level elements
note subject classification relatedItem identifier location accessConditions part extension recordInfo titleInfo name typeOfResource genre originInfo language physicalDescription abstract tableOfContents targetAudience

23 What does this set tell you?
MARCXML to MODS What does this set tell you? <mods xmlns=" <titleInfo> <title>Germany by bike : 20 tours geared for discovery /</title> </titleInfo> <name type="personal"> <namePart>Slavinski, Nadine,</namePart> <namePart type="date">1968-</namePart> <role><roleTerm type=“text”>creator</roleTerm></role> </name> <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource> <originInfo> <place><placeTerm type=“code” authority="marc">wau</placeTerm> <placeTerm type=“text”> Seattle, Wash. :</placeTerm> </place> <publisher>Mountaineers,</publisher> <dateIssued>c1994</dateIssued> <issuance>monographic</issuance> </originInfo> <language> <languageTerm type=“code” authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm> </language> <physicalDescription> <extent>238 p. : ill., maps ; 22 cm.</extent> </physicalDescription> <note type="statement of responsibility">Nadine Slavinski.</note> <note>Includes index.</note>

24 MODS (continued) What does this <subject>set tell you? What does authority='lcsh' mean? <subject authority="lcsh"> <topic>Bicycle touring</topic> <geographic>Germany</geographic> <topic>Guidebooks.</topic> </subject> <classification authority="lcc">GV1046.G3 G </classification> <classification authority="ddc" edition="20">796.6/4/0943</classification> <relatedItem type="series"> <titleInfo><title>By bike</title></titleInfo> </relatedItem> <identifier type="isbn"> (acid-free, recycled paper) :</identifier> <identifier type="lccn"> </identifier> <recordInfo> <recordContentSource>DLC</recordContentSource> <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">931129</recordCreationDate> <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601"> </recordChangeDate> <recordIdentifier> </recordIdentifier> </recordInfo> </mods>

25 MODS descriptions for each web site (but not each capture)
MINERVA: LC’s web archiving project (based on specific themes) Exploring issues with born digital resources MODS used for descriptive metadata Election 2002 Web archive Collaboration with Internet Archive, Webarchivist.org Selective collection of archived sites July-Nov. 2002 MODS records for each site (multiple captures) Other collections: 9/11, 107th Congress, War in Iraq, Election 2004 MODS descriptions for each web site (but not each capture) Transformation from XML to HTML display Links to web archive

26 Could you pair the displayed info with the MODS statements?

27 Differences between MODS and Dublin Core
MODS has structure Names Related item Subject MODS is more MARC-like so more compatibility with existing descriptions Semantics Conversions Relationships between elements MODS includes record management information

28 Choosing MODS for descriptive metadata
MODS is particularly useful for compatibility with existing bibliographic data embedded descriptions in related item Rich, hierarchical descriptions that work well with METS structural map “out of the box” schema; can use <extension> for local elements and to bring in external elements from other schemas

29 3 Transformation tools MARC toolkit Converter from MARC 21 to MARCXML
Transformations between metadata formats MODS Dublin Core ONIX

30 More development Changes from version 3.4 MADS ontology developed (Metadata Authority Description Schema) MODS User Guidelines (Version 3) [updated 04/06/2010] Bibliographic Framework Initiative


Download ppt "MARC Machine Readable Cataloging & MARC family"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google