Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Retaining Wall Design Slope Stability on US-189 MAQuiGr Engineering

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Retaining Wall Design Slope Stability on US-189 MAQuiGr Engineering"— Presentation transcript:

1 Retaining Wall Design Slope Stability on US-189 MAQuiGr Engineering
Picture of (site) Capstone Team Who we are (Members skills) Maquigr team beyond Shows fractured rocks Pictures displayed Retaining Wall Design Slope Stability on US-189 MAQuiGr Engineering greg Matthew Hakes, Quinton Taylor, Greg Hanks

2 Site Evaluation Site 1 is featured on top Site 2 on bottom Notice:
Water location Temporary solutions Loads caused by road Site 1 Site 2 greg

3 Considered Solutions Sheet pile Pros Rapid Construction Cons
Shallow rock makes it impossible to dig in deep enough to get moment Quinton matt greg Gabion Tieback Sheetpile Tieback Shotcrete Soil Nail

4 Analysis with SnailPlus
Assumptions made: Two different soil types Gravel/Sand Bedrock Loading Temporary Max: 700 psf from construction Permanent Max: 200 psf from traffic Morgenstern-Price General limit equilibrium (Moment-force) FHWA factors of safety used mat

5 Analysis with SnailPlus
Under construction loading conditions Under normal traffic loads Design section Calculation FS Slope Fmax Nails (k) Fmax Nails at Head (k) STR Check Nails STR Check Plates STR Check Facing No. 4 Calculation successful 1.347 17.3 0.296 0.89 0.286 No. 3 2.155 6.8 0.117 0.353 0.113 Design section Calculation FS Slope Fmax Nails (k) Fmax Nails at Head (k) STR Check Nails STR Check Plates STR Check Facing No. 4 Calculation successful 1.579 14.9 0.257 0.856 0.275 No. 3 3.07 5.5 0.094 0.331 0.09 matt

6 Final Design Initial conception of wall shape
Created slope in AUTO cad Unified design 1/2 the distance Follow slope or what Optimized for construction greg 10ft from road edge 120ft in length 17 Total Soil Nails Average height, 6ft Max height, 13ft

7 Phase 1 Site Preparation Conducted during low traffic flow
Conducted during low traffic flow Close southbound lane Flaggers to direct flow of traffic through single lane Environmental Impact Reduction (3 lines of defense) Excavated 5ft bench 1ft silt fence installed 20ft below excavation line Exposed Shoreline quiton

8 Excavation Slope Preparation
Phase 2 Excavation Slope Preparation 5ft bench approximately 10ft out from edge of the road Excavation of 1,000 cubic feet Soil relocated to holding site Quinton

9 Soil Nail Installation
Phase 3 Soil Nail Installation Williams Geo-Drill Injection Anchor System with rotary percussive drilling In case of hitting hard rock, a Polyester Resin Rock Anchor System may be used matt

10 Prefabrication of Rebar Cages
Phase 4 Prefabrication of Rebar Cages Phase 4: Constructed offsite due to limited space 75 year design life, hot-dip galvanizing Matt – geosynthetic fabrics have excellent water flow levels, prevents clogging by stopping soil from entering molded plastic core allows for high in-plane water flow and far more effective than the old gravel and perforated pipe system

11 Installing Rebar Cages
Phase 5 Installing Rebar Cages Challenge will be mobility and visibility of excavator Guided into place by multiple workers located on bench The key to the project was contstruction speed 8 in mat Number 6 rebar Tied together Bring in on flat bead and then drop in excavator secure them in place greg

12 Phase 6 Shotcrete Two step process using wire mesh as backstop for shotcrete First day application spraying towards the road, second day other side is applied A problem (wall needs concrete) solution we could pump it with shotcrete Bench was created for workers to stand on No wall – wire mesh 2 sided greg

13 Installing Drainage System Phase 7
Composite Drainage system Drainage system includes: geosythetic filtered fabric and molded plastic core Quinton – geosynthetic fabrics have excellent waterf flow levels, prevents clogging by stopping soil from entering molded plastic core allows for high in-plane water flow and far more effective than the old gravel and perforated pipe system

14 Anchor to wall Attachments
Phase 8 Anchor to wall Attachments Bearing plate, hardened washers, hex nut, and Geo-Drill Injection Anchor 75 year design life, galvanizing bearing plate and hardened washers and capped with a steel tube filled with cement grout Quinton

15 Phase 9 Backfill Using the soil from the excavation, backfill at 8-12in lifts Compact soil with plate compactor attachment while avoiding soil nails Increased bar size to improve bending strength in the case of accidental contact with compactor matt

16 Phase 10 Capping Phase 11 Cleanup Phase 10:
Last 4-6in of backfill will be filled with cement to cap off the retaining system Reduce permeability of surface and prevent corrosion Phase 11: Remove silt fencing and any loose material Add soil to bench to create a more natural slope Application of hydroseed to slope to promote vegetation growth matt

17 Time and Cost Estimates
The Federal Highway administration Charcteristics that cost $$$ Location, material, night time ect Schedule How we came up Integrating phases to opomize time greg Cost estimates are based on the FHWA pricing graph and scheduling was created in 11 phases

18 Conclusion A soil nail retaining system is the best option for this project Adaptable – Depending on what is encountered during construction this design can easily be modified to meet the needs of the project Cost Effective – With little excavation near the road, a temporary wall will be unnecessary 75 Design Life – Simple methods that can be implicated to increase design life quinton


Download ppt "Retaining Wall Design Slope Stability on US-189 MAQuiGr Engineering"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google