Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MINIATURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS GROUP: MINIATURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS GROUP: COST ANALYSIS OF PRE-CHILLING AND HEAT LEAKAGE DURING OPERATION FOR LH2 VJ STORAGE.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MINIATURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS GROUP: MINIATURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS GROUP: COST ANALYSIS OF PRE-CHILLING AND HEAT LEAKAGE DURING OPERATION FOR LH2 VJ STORAGE."— Presentation transcript:

1 MINIATURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS GROUP: MINIATURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS GROUP: COST ANALYSIS OF PRE-CHILLING AND HEAT LEAKAGE DURING OPERATION FOR LH2 VJ STORAGE & TRANSFER FACILITIES AT NASA KSC Presented by – Presented by – K.V.Krishna Murty

2 References : A report on ‘NASA KSC Base Center Hydrogen Operations’ by Dr.Addison Bain, 2001-2002. Communication of Mr.Thomas Tomsik (NASA GRC). Communication of Mr.Bill Notardonato (NASA KSC).

3 LH2 Storage and Transfer facilities:  LH2 Storage Tank: Outer Diameter of the outer shell = 70 ft, Inner Diameter of the inner shell = 62.5 ft, Material – Stainless Steel.  LH2 Transfer Line:  Fill Rate to ET = 8,400 gpm to 10,000 gpm,  Outer Jacket m/l – Stainless Steel,  Inner Jacket m/l – Welded Invar,

4 Economic Analysis of Pre-Chilling of metals: Assumptions and Values: Latent Heat of Vaporization of LH2 (L): 56 W-hr/lb Cost of Electricity = 0.05 $/kW-hr LH2 cost = 2 $/lb Specific Heat of 304 SS at cryogenic temperature = 144 J/lb-K Density of 304 SS = 0.285 lb/in 3 = 7,900 kg/m 3 Specific Heat of Welded Invar at cryogenic temperature = 149 J/lb-K Density of Welded Invar = 0.291 lb/in 3 = 8,055 kg/m 3 Thickness of storage tank = ½ in (assumed for calculations), VJ Transfer Line Length = 1500 ft Cooling Power of 1 RTBC = 1 kW @ 19K

5 Cost of Pre-Chilling: 304 SS: Cost of pre-chilling per lb of SS: 310K  80K 80K  19K LH2 Boil-off $0.328 $0.087 RTBC $0.004 $0.018 Cost of pre-chilling 304 SS over the complete range (310K  19K): cost/lb of SSSavings Boil-off$0.414 0 % 310K to 80K by RTBC, rest by boil-off$0.09178 % 310K to 19K by RTBC$0.02295 %

6 Pre-chilling with top stage  to 80 K Time Mass (min) (lb) 7½ 208 15 417 22½ 625 30 833 Pre-chilling with bottom stage  to 19K Time Mass (min) (lb) 37½ 208 75 417 112½ 625 150 833 Pre-Chilling of 304 SS (with 1 RTB): Pre-chilling with 2 stages  Time Mass (min) (lb) 45 208 90 417 135 625 180 833

7 Cost of Pre-Chilling: Welded Invar: Cost of pre-chilling per lb of Welded Invar: 310K  80K 80K  19K LH2 Boil-off$0.339 $0.090 RTBC $0.004 $0.019 Cost of pre-chilling Welded Invar over the complete range (310K  19K): cost/lb of WISavings Boil-off$0.429 0 % 310K to 80K by RTBC, rest by boil-off$0.09478 % 310K to 19K by RTBC$0.02395 %

8 Cost savings in maintaining the system at LH2 temperature by RTBC Cost savings in maintaining the system at LH2 temperature by RTBC : Considering 1 kW of heat leakage, If LH2 is let to boil-off: Rate of LH2 boil-off = 430 lb/day Cost of LH2 boil-off = 860 $/day If RTBC is used to prevent LH2 boil-off: Number of RTBC required = 1 Total cost of input power for 1 RTBC = 180 $/day The savings from complete boil-off to RTBC use for Pre-Chill = (860-180)/860 ≈ 79 %

9 Input power required to maintain the Storage Tank (Pad B) at LH2 temperature: LH2 Boil - Off = m = 600 gallons/day = 355 lb/day, Cost of LH2 Boil-Off = $ 260,000/yr, Input power required to maintain the Storage Tank (Pad B) at LH2 temperature: LH2 Boil - Off = m = 600 gallons/day = 355 lb/day, Cost of LH2 Boil-Off = $ 260,000/yr, Input power required = P where, P= m*L = (355*56)/24 = 830 W. So, a nominal cooling power of about 1 kW at 19K would be appropriate.

10 Time required to pre-chill the storage tank to 19 K with 1 RTB = 770 hr, Cost of LH2 Boil-Off for Pre-Chill = $ 105,000 Pre-Chilling of Storage Tank: Pre-Chilling of Transfer Line: LH2 Boil-Off Cost = $ 17,000, Number of RTBCs required to pre-chill the transfer line to 19K in 9 hrs, I.e., with both stages = 15 (1 for every 100 feet of the transfer line), Number of RTBCs required to pre-chill the transfer line to 80K in 9 hrs, I.e., if only the top stage is used = 3 (1 for every 500 feet of the transfer line).

11 Conclusion: The calculation shows that it is economically effective to use cryo- coolers for cooling the Liquid Hydrogen Vacuum Jacket storage & transfer facilities at NASA KSC. Please NOTE: This analysis considers only the running costs associated with the cryocoolers. It does not take into account the installation and maintenance costs associated with the cryocoolers.


Download ppt "MINIATURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS GROUP: MINIATURE ENGINEERING SYSTEMS GROUP: COST ANALYSIS OF PRE-CHILLING AND HEAT LEAKAGE DURING OPERATION FOR LH2 VJ STORAGE."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google