2. Hypothesis? They described studies in humans that show that SES influences cognitive and affective function in children, adolescents and young adults. Then, they discussed studies in human populations that have identified possible mediators of the effects of SES, and reviewed research in animals in which these factors were directly manipulated to assess their effect on offspring outcomes. Socioeconomic status (SES), a measure of one’s overall status and position in society, strongly influences an individual’s experiences from childhood and through adult life. Methods? Many were described because it’s a review

3. Distribution of depressive symptoms by family income category.

4. There is strong evidence which demonstrates SES is associated with language and executive function, and for differences in other cognitive and affective processes. Examples of differences in memory performance for low and high SES subjects

5. SES and neurocognitive systems: Prefrontal Activity in response to a Surprising Stimulus Varies According to Socioeconomic Status.

6. Lower subjective social status is associated with an increased amygdala response to angry faces

7. Socioeconomic status predicts hemispheric specialization of the left inferior frontal gyrus in young children Causation, correlation or association?

8. Disentangling cause and effect 2 non-mutually exclusive hypotheses: Social causation: The experiences that are typical of different levels of SES affect brain development. (More evidence: twins studies,) Social selection: Differences in brain functioning predispose people to a particular level of socioeconomic success and, therefore, to a particular SES (squizofrenia).

9. Cross-fostering studies that compared children who were adopted within or between SES levels also found a strong environmental component to SES-related differences in IQ, again supporting the social causation hypothesis

10. Candidate mechanisms of SES effects

11. Prenatal influences Low SES is associated with higher levels of stress, higher infection rates and poor nutrition during pregnancy. Higher levels of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and glucocorticoids in both the mother and the fetus. In rodents, pre- or peri-natal glucocorticoid administration to pregnant females reduces brain weight at birth, inhibits neurogenesis and delays neuronal maturation, myelination, gliogenesis and synapse formation. There is evidence in rodents that prenatal influences on hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity can be transmitted across generations in an epigenetic manner

12. Parental care Familial conflict is also associated to low SES Adult offspring of mothers that exhibit high licking and grooming also have enhanced expression of genes for GABA-A (γ-aminobutyric acid type A) receptor subunits in the amygdala that regulate inhibitory influences over stress responses, rendering the animals less fearful.

14. Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse.