1. 1

2. 2 What is the E 3 Alliance? A catalyst for change in Central Texas and in regions across the state Building a research-based regional blueprint to align our education systems to better fulfill the potential of every citizen and in turn, increase economic outcomes.

3. 3 What Are Achievement Gaps? Significant differences in educational outcomes (graduation rates, standardized assessments, etc.) between different demographic groups Socioeconomic Ethnic Gender Traditionally, some groups have shown outcomes 50% or more lower than other groups: –Continues cycles of poverty for families –Broadens economic gaps in communities –Makes overall economy less sustainable

4. 4 Texas Today: Huge Disparities in Degree Attainment Degree Attainment in 2000 - Texans 25 and Over Source: Texas State Data Center EC-2

5. 5 Why do we Care? 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 Advanced degrees earn about 3x more than non high school grads. $80,600 $28,500 Source; US Census Bureau Current Population Survey, March 2005 Higher degree = higher growth potential Age Group EC-8

6. 6 The Future of Central Texas will Dim if We Don’t “Close the Gaps” We stand to lose over 85,000 jobs We face personal income loss close to $10 Billion Total expenditures (spending on retail, local purchases, real estate, etc.) decline by over $40 Billion by 2030 Source: The Perryman Group EC-13

7. 7 Source: TEA, 2005-2006 AEIS Reports DM-7 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved Enrollment by Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Group

8. 8 Disproportionate Growth Among Student Populations Source: TEA, 2001-2002 and 2005-2006 AEIS Reports DM-5 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

9. 9 But: Districts are Very Different DM-10 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

10. 10 Achievement Gap: Problems & Progress 1.Large gaps between different ethnic and economic groups remain 2.Many – but not all – gaps are closing 3.Gaps are greater at higher grades, but tend to close at graduation  Partially because challenged students drop out! 4.Differences in district demographics don’t explain all differences in gaps  Need best practices to be better shared AG-1

11. 11 More Children & Families Starting Off Behind 18.2% of families with children under 5 earn below the poverty level Many child care facilities are unlicensed and unregulated; of those that are, 18.5% had met any sanctioned quality standard Only 43.8% of income-eligible 3-4 year olds (versus 55.1% for Texas) are enrolled in Head Start or public pre-K Source: Success by Six 2007 Report Card on Child Well-Being; data for Travis County only

12. 12 Source: TEA Division of Performance Reporting, Ad-hoc Report Computed at Panel Recommendation SSI – Passing at 1 st or 2 nd Administration K12-7 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved Central Texas Gaps: 5 th Grade TAKS

13. 13 Central Texas Gaps: 8 th Grade TAKS TAKS ReadingTAKS Math Source: TEA Division of Performance Reporting, Ad-hoc Report K12-10 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved Percent Passing SSI – Passing at 1st or 2nd Administration

14. 14 TAKS Gaps Vary Among Districts Gap between ethnic groups AG-3 Note: Gaps based on difference between White student performance and un- weighted average of Black and Hispanic student performance Source: TEA, 2005-2006 AEIS Reports Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

15. 15 Source: TEA, AEIS Reports 2005-06 Gaps Vary Even in Districts with Common Demographics AG-5 Note: Gaps based on difference between White student performance and un- weighted average of Black and Hispanic student performance Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

16. 16 Females Graduate at Higher Rates than Males Source: TEA, AEIS Reports 2005-06 AG-5A Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

17. 17 White Students Graduating with More Rigorous Curriculum Source: TEA Division of Performance Reporting, Ad-hoc Request AG-11 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

18. 18 “Qualified” Math Teachers not at Schools with Highest Needs Percent of Student Enrollment that is Economically Disadvantaged, 2005 School Year Source: Dr. Ed Fuller, School of Education, University of Texas at Austin Percent of Student Body that is Econ. Disadvantaged Note: “Qualified” defined as teachers certified in subject, teaching in-field MS-4

19. 19 LEP Achievement Gaps in Elementary School Source: TEA Division of Performance Reporting, Ad-hoc Report LE-4 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

20. 20 LEP Achievement Gaps Grow at Upper Grades Source: TEA Division of Performance Reporting, Ad-hoc Report LE-5 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

21. 21 Are Graduates Taking College Admissions Tests? African Americans in Central Texas take admission tests at a far higher rate than Hispanics Source: TEA Division of Performance Reporting, Ad-hoc Report CR-2 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

22. 22 Scores on Entrance Exams for Ethnic Minorities Lower and not Rising Source: TEA Division of Performance Reporting, Ad-hoc Report CR-5 Copyright ©. Texas Education Agency. All Rights Reserved

23. 23 Reported Low-Income College Population Surprisingly Low Source: THECB Aggregate Data Request MA-7 Of the 45% of Central Texas students who are economically disadvantaged, only 11% go to college

24. 24 Variation in College Grad Rates by Ethnicity Across Public Institutions Source: THECB Aggregate Data Request Note: Asian and Native American rates were combined to prevent dropping numbers due to FERPA. However, it should be noted these rates vary greatly between the two. GR-4

25. 25 College Graduation Rates Lower for Economically Disadvantaged Students Source: THECB Aggregate Data Request GR-7 Students are traditional students and does not include transfers

26. 26 Graduation Rates Vary by Ethnicity Source: THECB Aggregate Data Request Note: Asian and Native American were combined to prevent dropping numbers due to FERPA. However, it should be noted these percentages vary greatly between the two. GR-8

27. 27 Type of Student Matters More and more of our college students are “non-traditional” –part time, delayed start –54% of Central Texas college-goers Hispanics more likely to be non- traditional Central Texas Graduation Rates: –Traditional students: 54% –All college students: 41%

28. 28 Source: THECB Aggregate Data Request GR-9 Economically Disadvantaged Populations Map to Low College Graduation Rates