1. Illinois Brand Study 2014 LINDA OWENS & SOWMYA ANAND SURVEY RESEARCH LABORATORY University of Illinois at Chicago www.srl.uic.edu

2. Study Methodology 2 Study Populations Alumni of Illinois Parents of Illinois students Residents of Cook, DuPage, and Lake Counties in Illinois Methods Three separate online questionnaires E-mail invitations to alumni and parents Letter invitation to IL residents to complete online

3. Response Rates 3 Total in sample Total emails or mail delivered# completedResponse rate Alumni parents4,6593,4191,60747.0% Non-alumni parents11,6238,3962,80633.4% Chicago alums5,9855,03677415.4% Other alums3,9903,72864217.2% IL residents4,0043,7091022.8% Overall response rate 24%

4. Questionnaire 4  Number of questions varied by group  Ratings on 5-point scales and some 3-point scales  Select one or multiple from list  Open-end questions  Can group items into 6 main themes  Connection to Illinois  Value of an Illinois education  Quality of an Illinois education  How well Illinois reaches out to alumni/parents/residents  Sources of information about the university  Attitudes and intentions regarding giving

5. Questionnaire 5  Examples  Connection to Illinois  How often do you attend events held by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?  At this time, how strong is your connection to the university?  Value of an Illinois education  How would you evaluate the value for money you get from the educational programs & services provided by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?  Quality of an Illinois education  How well does the education provided by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign train students for a specific career or profession?

6. Questionnaire 6  Examples  How well Illinois reaches out to alumni/parents/residents  How much does the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign value its relationship with alumni/parents/residents?  How close a connection does the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign maintain with alumni/parents/residents?  Sources of information about the university  How much information do you get about what is happening at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?  In the past 3 months, have you seen any advertisements featuring the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?  Attitudes and intentions regarding giving  Of the following, which motivates you the most to make a charitable gift to the university?  In the next 5 years, how likely are you to make a financial contribution to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?

7. Alumni Results R 2 = 0.290, F (5, n = 1,315) = 108.668, p < 0.000 Alumni who feel connected more likely to intend to make a financial contribution in the next five years 7 Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients tSig. BStd. ErrorBeta (Constant)–1.3090.186 –7.0340.000 Connect3.1860.2380.34913.3980.000 Value1.2850.2150.1625.9850.000 Change since R attended0.6610.1560.1054.2310.000 Outreach1.0750.2000.1475.3740.000 Age0.0060.0020.0843.4660.001

8. Alumni Results Feeling connected also strongly associated with past contributions 8 Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients tSig. BStd. ErrorBeta (Constant)–1.3960.158 –8.8500.000 Connect1.8790.1940.2619.6710.000 Quality0.3540.1670.0572.1250.034 Change since R attended 0.3940.1290.0793.0480.002 Respondent age0.0180.0010.33912.6870.000 R 2 = 0.173, F (4, n = 1,308) = 69.423, p < 0.000.

9. Alumni Results Unfortunately, connection to Illinois is not very strong 9 Not strong at all (1) Slightly strong (2) Moderately strong (3) Very strong (4) Extremely strong (5)Total At this time, how strong is your connection to the university? 418402367163641,414 29.6%28.4%26.0%11.5%4.5% 100.0% Mean 2.3

10. Alumni Results 10 NortheastMidwestSouthWest Not strong at all (1) 222844635 41.5%27.1%38.0%31.0% Slightly strong (2) 132973337 24.5%28.3%27.3%32.7% Moderately strong (3) 122773031 22.6%26.4%24.8%27.4% Very strong (4) 3132118 5.7%12.6%9.1%7.1% Extremely strong (5) 35812 5.7%5.5%0.8%1.8% Total 531,048121113 100.0% Mean2.12.42.12.2 χ 2 (12, n = 1,335) = 21.816, p = 0.040. At this time, how strong is your connection to the university?

11. Alumni Results However, there is opportunity to strengthen alumni connections 11 Decrease greatly/ somewhat (1) Stay the same (2) Increase somewhat (3) Increase greatly (4)Total Would you like your current level of connection to the university to increase, decrease, or stay the same in the future? 425186161371,313 3.2%39.5%46.9%10.4% 100.0% Mean 2.6

12. Alumni Results 12 ChicagolandElsewhere Decrease greatly/somewhat (1) 21 2.9%3.5% Stay the same (2) 236281 33.1%47.1% Increase somewhat (3) 367248 51.4%41.5% Increase greatly (4) 9047 12.6%7.9% Total 714597 100.0% Mean2.72.5 χ 2 (3, n = 1,311) = 30.238, p = 0.000. Would you like your current level of connection to the university to increase, decrease, or stay the same in the future? Chicagoland based alumni would like to increase connection

13. Alumni Results 13 How Much the University Values Its Relationship with Alumni χ 2 (3, n = 1,335) = 9.237, p = 0.026. But, Chicagoland based alumni also have less positive perceptions ChicagolandElsewhere Not at all (1) 2614 3.4%2.2% A little (2) 15785 20.3%13.3% A moderate amount (3) 263211 34.0%33.0% A lot (4) 241246 31.2%38.4% A great deal (5) 8684 11.1%13.1% Total 773640 100.0% Mean3.33.5

14. Alumni Results 14 ChicagolandElsewhere Not well at all (1) 159 1.9%1.4% Slightly well (2) 6331 8.2%4.8% Moderately well (3) 200131 25.9%20.4% Very well (4) 337303 43.6%47.2% Extremely well (5) 158168 20.4%26.2% Total 773642 100.0% Mean3.73.9 χ 2 (4, n = 1,415) = 16.907, p = 0.002 How Well “World-Class Educational Institution” Describes the University

15. Alumni Results 15 ChicagolandElsewhere Not at all/to a small extent (1) 238 3.3%1.3% To some extent (2) 18098 25.5%16.3% To a large extent (3) 223220 31.5%36.7% To a great extent (4) 281274 39.7%45.7% Total 707600 100.0% Mean3.13.3 How Much Illinois Research Impacts the World χ 2 (3, n = 1,307) = 22.948, p = 0.000.

16. Alumni Results 16 How Much the Educational Experience Provided by the University Helps to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking and Analytic Skills χ 2 (3, n = 1,309) = 11.182, p = 0.011. ChicagolandElsewhere Does not help at all/helps a little (1) 3934 5.4%5.8% Helps a moderate amount (2) 179105 24.9%17.8% Helps a lot (3) 281237 39.1%40.1% Helps a great deal (4) 219215 30.5%36.4% Total 718591 100.0% Mean2.93.1

17. Alumni Results 17 How Much the Education Provided by the University Improves Students’ Future Earning Potential χ 2 (3, n = 1,335) = 9.237, p = 0.026. ChicagolandElsewhere Not at all/a little (1) 3525 4.8%4.1% A moderate amount (2) 196127 26.8%21.1% A lot (3) 286234 39.1%38.8% A great deal (4) 215217 29.4%36.0% Total 732603 100.0% Mean2.93.1

18. Parent Results 18  Very similar results for parents stratum  Strength of connection lower among non-alumni parents,  Yet group expresses a slightly greater preference for increasing their connection.

19. 19 Questions?

20. Thank you! 20