Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Why Woody Biomass? Forest Management Perspective Malcolm North, USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Dept of Plant Sciences, U.C. Davis Fire suppressed.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Why Woody Biomass? Forest Management Perspective Malcolm North, USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Dept of Plant Sciences, U.C. Davis Fire suppressed."— Presentation transcript:

1 Why Woody Biomass? Forest Management Perspective Malcolm North, USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Dept of Plant Sciences, U.C. Davis Fire suppressed forest, northern Sierra Nevada Forest with a restored fire regime, eastern Sierra Nevada

2  Contain the tallest (the coast redwood ‘Hyperion’ @ 378 ft), largest (General Sherman [giant sequoia] @ 55,000 ft 3 ) and possibly oldest (Methuselah [bristlecone pine] >5,000 yrs) trees in the world  Some of the forests are among the most productive in the world  California’s National Forests are growing at the rate of 3.7 billion board feet/year on 9.8 million acres of non-reserve land  N.F. harvest levels are at 8% of growth; 92% accumulates  Many forests are overstocked with small trees that significantly reduce forest resilience to wildfire, pests/pathogens and changing climate conditions California’s Forests

3 Most Productive Sierra Nevada Forest Types Are Fire Dependent Forest TypeFire Return Interval (yrs) Douglas-fir Current FRI ≈12-17 ≈480 Ponderosa pine Current FRI ≈4-10 ≈275 Mixed conifer Current FRI ≈12-20 ≈690 Fir: White Current FRI ≈30-50 ≈850

4 Historic and Current Forest Conditions and Fire Severity Time Period Historic (pre 1870) Current (after 1970) Current wildfires burn differently: mostly high-intensity crown fires that kill most trees even the large, old ones.

5 Unburned, untreated forest quickly increases in density and becomes at-risk to insects, disease, drought and wildfire

6 Current Condition of Untreated Fire- Suppressed Forests: Reduced Ecosystem Services 1)High stem density: Many ecosystem processes (nutrient cycling, decomposition, etc.) stall. 2)High canopy cover: dramatically reduces variability in microclimate and wildlife habitat, reduces surface snowpack depth and water production. 3)Fuels accumulations: Heavy litter and coarse woody debris homogenizes the forest floor substrate reducing understory plant diversity and cover.

7 Increased tree density from fire suppression leads to drought stress Mortality in the forest is now primarily driven by drought/beetles Climate change is likely to make this a substantial problem: greater annual weather variability, higher evaporative demand, bark beetle populations are kept in check by cold over-wintering temperatures—a condition that is likely to become more rare. Thinning and biomass removal substantially reduces competition for scarce soil moisture increasing tree resilience Forests have higher mortality and are less resilient to climate change

8 Turkey Creek in the 138,000 acre Hayman Fire aftermath on the front range of the Rocky Mountains – Denver says $20 million still to be spent to dredge 1 million cubic yards of sediment from their municipal reservoirs. Wildfire Expenses: Watershed Damage and Litigation Legal Expenses: Sierra Pacific Industries settles for $122.5 million for starting the Moonlight Fire (above) when a bulldozer strikes a rock PG&E pays $29.5 million for starting the Fred’s fire when a pruned tree hits a power line

9 Is Thinning Necessary or Can Fire Alone Achieve Restoration? With fire only there are often at least 4 obstacles: Fire is not surgical 3)Litter accumulation can produce hot, long- duration temperatures that can kill large, old trees. 2) 1) Without thinning, small and intermediate size trees can ‘ladder’ surface or ground burns into catastrophic crown fires. 4) Difficult to create gaps where and when you want them

10 Untreated Thinned and Prescribe Burned Fire Direction Cone Wildfire, N. Calif. Compelling evidence that mechanical fuels treatments, which reduce specific ladder and surface fuels, can be highly effective ‘Tested’ fuels treatments in the Sierra include Angora, Brown, Sugarloaf, Power, Pittville, Milford, Antelope-Wheeler, Moonlight, American River Complex, Piute, Rich, Grass Valley, Cone, and Calpine Sugarloaf Fire: Treated (above) and Untreated (below) forest within 200 m.

11 Litigation and economics are probably the two leading roadblocks One of the perceived conflicts is the association of some sensitive species with forest conditions that have high surface and ladder fuel loads and high canopy cover. How do you provide habitat for these species while reducing fuel loads? Newspaper cover story, northern goshawk and California spotted owl What’s Holding Up Implementing Fuels Treatments?

12 Recent science summaries suggest a strategy for implementing fuels reduction while also providing for wildlife habitat and forest restoration: Use topography as a guide to create variable forest conditions Landscape schematic of variable forest conditions produced by management treatments that vary by topographic factors such as slope, aspect, and slope position. Ridgetops have the lowest stem density and highest percentage of pine in contrast to riparian areas. Midslope forest density and composition varies with aspect: density and fir composition increase on more northern aspects and flatter slope angles. Riparian forest provide high canopy cover movement corridors.

13 Why are Fuels Treatments Stalled? Economics The large-scale fuels treatments which are needed will never occur unless most of them can ‘pay for themselves’. Thinning merchantable trees, however, rarely affects potential wildfire intensity, and can create the perception and problems associated with ‘getting the cut out’. The most effective fuels treatments remove small material—biomass—but without a market, material is left or treatment never occurs. A market for biomass could substantially increase the pace and scale of much needed fuels reduction treatments.

14 Summary: Research is very consistent that mid-elevation S.N. forests did not evolve with the current high density of small tree resulting from fire suppression Research also suggests removal of small trees (≈ diameter <14”) may benefit ecosystem functions particularly by reducing moisture stress Reduction in surface fuel loads have significant positive effects jump starting, stalled ecosystem processes (i.e., understory diversity, decomposition, nutrient cycling) Biomass removal reduces fire severity, in some cases allowing prescribed fire or managed wildfire to be used after treatment. Reintroduction of low-severity fire is the most effective means of restoring resilience, which is particularly important if changes in climate occur.


Download ppt "Why Woody Biomass? Forest Management Perspective Malcolm North, USFS Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Dept of Plant Sciences, U.C. Davis Fire suppressed."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google