Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Grocery Store Measures
Door Gasket Laboratory Testing
2
Agenda BPA Recommendations
Gasket Damage, Door Open Times & Gasket Cost Data Emerson Lab Test Results Next Steps
3
I. BPA Recommendations Door Gaskets – Deemed Measure
Automatic Door Closer – Deemed Measure KEY ASSUMPTIONS: a. Energy Savings adjusted for median door open times. b. Medium Temp Reach-In estimated at 2/3 of Low Temp Reach-In. c. B/C ratio assumes 4 year measure life.
4
Comparison of Savings (kWh/year/door)
Case Type Case Temp Emerson Lab Testing Express Efficiency1 SCE1,3 Reach-In Low 410 2,369 Medium 273 407 Walk-In 662 4,708 361 809 Notes: Assumes gasket length of 15' for Reach-In and 20' for Walk-In Emerson Lab Testing: BPA sponsored Emerson study SCE: So. Calif. Edison Work Papers WPSCNRRN0013 (10/2007) and WPSCNRRN0001, Revision 1 (10/2007)
5
II. Gasket Damage Basis for Lab Testing (Ref. Phase 1 Report, 2/2007).
Reach-in Low Temp: Very high level of damage near the handle. Typical tear is 6-12 inches Reach-in Medium Temp: Typically at bottom of door. Typical tear is 6-12 inches. Ten to twenty percent of damaged gaskets prevent door closure. Walk-in Low & Medium Temp: Typical tears are: Two to three feet in length Completely missing several feet of gasket Similar to Swiss cheese in appearance Hard, brittle and blocking door closure The standard used for repair in the PNW is a minimum 6” double tear. A man’s fist should generally fit comfortably through the tear.
6
Door Open Times Methodology:
Number of Doors Avg Open Time (Min) Median Open Time (Min) Avg Open Time (%) Median Open Time (%) All Walk-Ins 14 28.6 4.4 17.0% 9.4% All Reach-Ins 24 88.7 0.3 7.6% 0.6% Low-Temp Walk-Ins 4 3.7 4.2 4.5% 4.1% Med-Temp Walk-Ins 10 38.5 6.1 22.1% 17.6% Low-Temp Reach-Ins 145.6 1.1 12.2% 1.5% Med-Temp Reach-Ins 0.2 0.2% Methodology: Total of (38) cases monitored at (10) sites: 14 walk-ins & 24 reach-ins Field Installed, Hobo U State Loggers, in place 1 to 4 weeks
7
Cost Information Average of Total Linear Feet Door Type Total $/lnft
Door Type Total $/lnft Total Door Cost Reach-In Low Temp 15 7 $ Reach-In Med Temp 17 5 $ Walk-In Low Temp $ Walk-In Med Temp 16 $ Walk-In Med Temp - Glass entry Door 19 $ Auto-closer (reach-in) $36 - $40 Auto-closer (walk-in) $100 - $250
8
III. Lab Testing
9
Laboratory Testing – Interim Results
Completed Gasket and Auto Closer testing and report: Low temperature reach-in Low temperature walk-in Medium temperature walk-in Completed testing on strip curtains – report under review.
10
Low Temperature Reach-In Results
11
Low Temperature Walk-In Results
12
Medium Temperature Walk-In Results
13
Next Steps Finalize report on strip curtains
Conduct UA-testing on walk-in Evaluate results with wider audience including peer review. Prepare technical paper. Incorporate revised results into ESG, as appropriate
14
Door Gasket Laboratory Testing
Supporting Slides Door Gasket Laboratory Testing
15
Steady State Operation Anomalies (Full Gasket / Damaged Gasket)
Condenser Air Inlet Full: 74.5 F. Damaged: 72.5 F. Saturated Suction Temperature -36 F. -32 F. Compressor Operating EER Full: 3.84 Damaged: 4.24
16
Anomaly Impact on Test Summary
Full Gasket test negatively impacted by 1.7 kWh per day
17
Normalized Energy Results
Full Damaged 24 Hour Energy (kWh) 52.6 / 50.9* / 54.3 Daily Increase (kWh) Baseline / 3.4* % Daily Increase Baseline 3.2% / 6.7%* *Italics: original number Bold: Normalized number
18
Door Open Time Study Total of (38) cases monitored at (10) sites
Mix of Walk-Ins and Reach-Ins Field Installed Hobo U State Loggers At least one week; up to four weeks
19
Duration of Door Openings (Minutes)
20
Door Open Times – by Case Type
21
Door Open Times
22
Product Type
23
Estimated Annual Energy Savings - Door Closers
24
History – Average Gasket Damage
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.