1. The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY Mariia Naumenko

2. BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 2 Objectives To increase capacity in KBP up to 80 movements per hour taking into account the following:  how to increase efficiency to minimize costs to the airlines  how to manage runway safety  how to deal with environmental issues

3. BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 3 Current situation in KBP 2 independent parallel RWYs, mixed operation mode; 2 parallel TWYs; declared capacity – 45 m/hr; real throughput – 36-44 m/hr in peak hours; negligible number of low visibility days; 84 routes (12 nat., 72 internat.)

4. BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 4 Analyze constraints, develop solutions, estimate costs and impact on capacity  Runways / Taxiways  Apron / Parking  Passenger Service  ATC  Environment Impact of remedial action (normal conditions) Impact Score No operational improvement0 1 Low2 3 4 Medium5 6 7 High8 9 Very high10 Cost Code Cost Estimation 1Low 2Medium 3High 4Very high

5. Clusters Short-term Cluster 1 Includes infrastructural improvements on the runways and taxiways, on apron, terminals and operational improvements. Cost / Benefit : 57 / 121 BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 5 Short-term Cluster 2 Includes infrastructural and operational improvements as Cluster 1. It would bring comparatively less benefit but for the less cost. Cost / Benefit : 44 / 99 Short-term Cluster 3 Cluster 3 includes no infrastructural improvements, but variety of operational ones. Cost / Benefit : 22 / 72 Medium-term Cluster This cluster has no possibility to be implemented until 2012, but has a great potential to increase capacity even more than to 80 movements per hour. Cost / Benefit : 54 / 83

6. Choose the Best Cluster Remedial impact on capacity BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 6 Time necessary for gaining benefits Cost of implementation SHORT-TERM CLUSTER 3

7. Short-term Cluster 3 (procedures) BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 7 1.Review AIP. 2.Awareness campaign + leaflet. 3.Reduce radar separation from 5nm to 3nm. 4.Training of ATC on efficient procedures. 5.Review SIDs such that departure separation of 1 min is authorized. 6.“Quiet” prop SIDs. 7.Efficient sequencing and multiple line-up. 8.Use both RWYs.

8. Short-term Clusters (infrastructure) BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 8 Replace TWY 13 by two RETs Displace the threshold for 36R Holding bays Expand apron S Reconstruction & new terminals

9. Alternatives BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 9 Unlimited budget? Not very limited budget? Future development? ST Cluster 1 ST Cluster 2 MT Cluster

10. 10 Steps to Increase Runway Safety Signs Training Communication Safety Awareness Campaign Local Runway Safety Team BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY

11. How to deal with environmental issues CDA Use green electricit y Review SIDs Local Environment Team BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 11 Continuous Descent Approach

12. BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 12 CDA Philosophy of Flight! Efficiency Costs Environment FL 180 FL 120 10 Min A Benefits: Save fuel Save time Reduce pollution Increase comfort

13. BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 13 Airport Collaborative Decision Making Tear down the walls! Airline operators Controllers Airport operators Ground handlers Shared, accurate and timely information

14. BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 14 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System Perfect eyes! The picture of the ground traffic at night from the Control Tower (without A- SMGCS) The same but with A-SMGCS A-SMGCS can help to maintain safety and capacity at night!

15. Conclusions As the result of the study we get: 1.Analysis of the airport operation. 2.Definition of main capacity constraints. 3.4 different scenarios to increase capacity. 4.Recommendations to deal with environmental and safety issues. 5.Solutions to increase efficiency minimizing costs to airlines. BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 15

16. BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY 16 Questions?