1. Code 220 GSFC Facilities Master Planning – A 2014 Perspective Date: March 19, 2015 Presented by: Xzavior Hill Xzavior.d.hill@nasa.gov 301.286.0104 POC:Rick Carter Richard.a.carter@nasa.gov 301.286.4222 www.nasa.gov

2. Agenda  Agency Perspective  Goddard at a Glance  Master Planning-Facility Sustainability  2002 Master Plan - A Campus Framework: The Idea of Consolidation  Budget Impact and Response 2

3. Facility Master Planning from an Agency Perspective 3 Strategic Tactical US Aerospace Policy Strategic Planning Program Strategies Mission Support Strategies Budgeting Program Execution Capital Investment Program Plan Program Alignment NASA Center Master Plans similarly stretch the term. Facilities Strategy Agency Master Planning is far broader than common usage of the term master plan

4. Facility History 4 Key Challenge - Facility Risk: Share of NASA facilities assets under 40 years old As asset ages rise and requirements evolve, NASA must renew the assets our programs need

5. Goddard at a Glance 5

6. Mission Comparison: Goddard/USAF 6 Without going through Goddard! You can’t go here… You can’t provide Air Power… Without providing facilities!

7. GSFC Facilities Master Planning – Facility Suitability For the past two decades Goddard's main facilities challenges have been: Quality or Condition: Occupant requirements have risen and facilities readiness has declined with age Configuration: Like activities are not well distributed across a site Quantity or Capacity: Certain activities (such as launch at Wallops) have grown, others have dwindled In response to these challenges, GSFC developed aggressive, reasonably coherent Center Master plans. 7

8. 2002 Master Plan - A Campus Framework: The Idea of Consolidation 8 Configuration Strengthen adjacencies amongst activities Put like functions together Draw the workforce closer together Condense the sight Create places to work better with off- site partners Bring partners on or near the Center Make divested assets available Condition Core competencies: Earth science, Space Science, science enabling technologies State-of-the-art Facilities Program/project management & Institutional Support Industry Standard Facilities Capacity Over 20 years the center projects a reduction of about 25% in workforce. Right size the Facilities Optimize the Resources Designate some assets for partners

9. 9 Earth Science Space Science Engineering Prog./Proj. Mgmt. Planning Principle: Create functional “ neighborhoods ” to improve performance and strengthen linkages 2002 Master Plan - A Campus Framework: The Idea of Consolidation

10. 10 2002 Master Plan – Progress: Science and Program / Project Management re-location BUILD NEW RESTORE DEMOLISH Building 2 Demolition New Flight Projects Bldg Building 34 Recently Completed Building 16 Demolition (Imminent)

11. 11 2002 Master Plan – Progress: Institutional Re-location BUILD NEW RESTORE DEMOLISH Building 26 Restoration New Logistics Facility Building 16 Demolition (Imminent)

12. 2010 Master Plan - Budget Impact 12 Budget projections about 1/3 of planned values About 60% of the plan is no longer affordable Next 20 years will only enable first 5-7 years of 2010 plan

13. Budget Impact Response 13 Center Funded Program Validation Lines of Business Review Reliability Centered Maintenance Energy Reduction actions Interruption/Curtailment events Teleworking Controls Based Maintenance M.Y. & ROI programs used to recapitalize