1. Resonance and Sound Decay: A Quantitative Study of Acoustic guitars Acoustical Society of America Meeting October 3, 2005 by Erika Galazen and Joni Nordberg Advisor: Professor Tom Huber Department of Physics, Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter MN

2. Introduction Musical instruments to date have been perfected almost entirely through trial and error Many properties of musical instruments have yet to be quantified Musical instruments to date have been perfected almost entirely through trial and error Many properties of musical instruments have yet to be quantified

3. Objectives Study the physical properties of acoustic guitars Determine and compare the decay constants for the body of the guitar, the string, and the sound at resonant and non-resonant frequencies Compare the decay constants for different types of guitars in order to gain insight into what makes a guitar good or bad. We studied three guitars: a “Little” guitar, a classical guitar, and an acoustic guitar

4. Observed Beat Pattern When studying the decay of notes using a microphone, we saw some cases where there was some sort of beat pattern that was visible in the microphone amplitudes It was even possible to hear the beats on a very inexpensive “little” guitar we studied. These beats are not desirable for production of quality sound

5. Observed Beat Pattern

6. Non-Uniformity of Sound Decay Instead of a uniform exponential sound decay, the sound envelope shows a beat structure May be due to exchange of energy to different parts of the coupled vibrating system Energy exchanged between vibrations of the string (which produce relatively little sound) and vibrations of the body of the guitar (which produces more sound) Similar to Wilberforce pendulum or other coupled oscillators

7. Hypothesis Beat patterns are related to the exchange of energy between the strings and the body of the guitar. To test our hypothesis we simultaneously measured the vibration of the body and the strings as well as the decay of the sound coming from the guitar for different notes on the guitar, seeing as this trend only appears for some notes that we suspected was due to the resonant frequencies of the guitar’s body

8. Experimental Setup Laser vibrometer detected the vibrations of the body of the guitar Pick-up detected vibrations of string Microphone detected the sound

9. Finding Resonant Frequencies Vibrate guitar body with a mechanical shaker over a range of frequencies Focus laser vibrometer to detect vibrations Use signal analyzer to view the frequency spectrum

10. Comparison of frequency spectrum for different guitars

11. All Guitars exhibit some similar resonant frequencies The “Little” guitar shows wider resonant frequency peaks This could be responsible for the prominent beat structure

12. Data acquisition and Techniques Tune Guitar to desired frequency, and damp other strings for data collection Capture single note decay Import data straight to computer through two preamplifiers and from the vibrometer Created a program to automatically detect peaks in signals

13. Results obtained for little guitar System of automatically detecting the peaks in the decay of the waveform from microphone located near the guitar

14. Fitting decay data to exponential These microphone peaks are from a non-resonant frequency note Measurement of all peaks shows some non-uniform decay, such as dips at 1.1s, 1.7s, and 2.5 s From decays like this, we were able to verify that the sound decays faster when near a resonant frequency

15. Preliminary Results First Two Guitars (“Little” and Classical) We were able to observe a common Resonant frequency of the body around a G# Resonant frequency note has a shorter sustain than the note not at a resonant frequency, similar to published studies Observed non-uniform beat structure on top of the exponential decay of sound Most Recent Guitar Studied Observed much of the same as with the previous two guitars With more advanced data acquisition and analysis, we were able to look further into the phenomena noticed in the first two guitars like the energy transfer between the string and the guitar body

16. Decay of pickup amplitude of different frequencies Maybe not so clear of a dependence on frequency Look at just the transient decay at the beginning

17. Clearer view of the frequency dependence on the string vibration decay Notes closer to the Resonant frequency decay faster

18. 145 Hz This data is taken at a frequency of 145 Hz (D3) Observe the Vibrometer and the pickup are out of phase There appears to be two different decay rates corresponding to the transient effects and the long term effects

19. 145 Hz The different decay rates become more apparent when the peaks of the data are plotted The long term effects were difficult to quantify

20. 200 Hz This data is taken at the resonant frequency Can observe the relative phases between the string, body, and sound vibrations

21. 200 Hz The peaks from the previous data set at the initial attack of the string Consistently see that the pickup decays away the fastest At other frequencies, even the decay of the transient data shows dependence on frequencies

22. Results The sound of notes played near or at body resonances of the guitar decay faster than those far away from resonances The “little” guitar had wider resonance peaks, the nicer guitars had narrower resonance peaks There are two different decay rates pertaining to the transient and steady state decays There appears to be a phase difference between the vibration of the guitar string and the guitar’s body that we suspect is due to transfer of energy

23. Future Research Plans Verify that decay patterns caused by playing a note are a superposition of decays from the string, the body of the guitar and harmonics of the frequency Accurately view relative amplitudes of vibrations Study more guitars and additional variables of them in order to be able to draw more conclusions about what factors determine a ‘good’ guitar

24. Special Thanks Our Advisor, Dr. Tom Huber Sigma Xi Foundation ASA