Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Senior Review 2012 Summary Presented to AAAC May 11, 2012 Jaya Bajpayee Program Executive Astrophysics Operating Missions & Physics of the Cosmos Program.

Published byAnn Johns Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Senior Review 2012 Summary Presented to AAAC May 11, 2012 Jaya Bajpayee Program Executive Astrophysics Operating Missions & Physics of the Cosmos Program."— Presentation transcript:

1 Senior Review 2012 Summary Presented to AAAC May 11, 2012 Jaya Bajpayee Program Executive Astrophysics Operating Missions & Physics of the Cosmos Program

2 2012 Senior Review of Operating Missions Invited Missions PlanckHubble ChandraFermi Warm SpitzerKepler Swift Suzaku XMM-Newton 2 2012 Senior Review Schedule Draft Call for proposalsJuly 1, 2011 Call for ProposalsAugust 10, 2011 EPO SR Proposals DueDec 15, 2011 SR Proposals DueJan 15, 2011 EPO Section ReviewJan 23 – 25, 2012 SRC MeetsFeb 28-March 2, 2012 Final ReportMarch 30, 2012 Call for proposals and results of past senior reviews at: http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/2012-senior-review/ Astro 2012 SR - Presentation to AAAC 5/11/12

3 Overall Findings SRC 2012 didn’t provide an overall rank-order They felt we have a minimum set of missions – nothing can be turned off SRC rated Missions in 5 Metrics: –Discovery Space, Long Term Impact, Publications/$, Synergy, Criticality SRC also considered missions among each class –Great Observatories: HST & Chandra –Discovery/Probe Class: Kepler, Fermi, Spitzer –Explorer: Swift –Foreign: Planck, Suzaku, XMM-Newton Overall Recommendations: Reduce cost of mission operations Increase GO funding 5/11/123Astro 2012 SR - Presentation to AAAC

4 Rating by Metrics MISSION DISCOVERY SPACE LONG TERM IMPACT PUBLICATION/ $ SYNERGY CRITICAL CAPABILITY HEALTH OF SCIENCE PROGRAM (RYG) HST9.5 7 10G CHANDRA9.09.579 G SWIFT999.5109.5Y KEPLER997.589.5G SPITZER986.599.5G XMM899.599R SUZAKU88107.59R FERMI7.5 789G PLANCK71068.59.5G 5/11/124Astro 2012 SR - Presentation to AAAC

5 2012 Senior Review Results Mission Result Chandra − Fully fund as budgeted thru FY16 − Augment Guest Observer Program at ½ Project request Fermi − Mission extension thru FY16 − Reduced budget starting in FY14 Hubble − Fully fund as budgeted Kepler − Extend mission operations thru FY16 − Augment Guest Observer and Participating Science Program at 1/2 Project request Planck − Fund US Support of 1-year extension of Low Frequency Instrument operations Spitzer − Extend ops thru FY14 − Closeout in FY15 Suzaku − Extend US Science support through March 2015 (Astro-H launch +1 year) Swift − Extend mission operations thru FY16 − Augment Guest Observer Program per Project request XMM-Newton − Extend US support through March 2015 Note: All FY15 and FY16 decisions will be revisited in the 2014 Senior Review.

Download ppt "Senior Review 2012 Summary Presented to AAAC May 11, 2012 Jaya Bajpayee Program Executive Astrophysics Operating Missions & Physics of the Cosmos Program."

Similar presentations

Return to Hubble: Servicing Mission 4 Dr. Frank Summers Space Telescope Science Institute April 2, 2009.

Return to Hubble: Servicing Mission 4 Dr. Frank Summers Space Telescope Science Institute April 2, 2009.
CUC 22-23 Oct 2013 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 15 Peer Review  18-21 June 2013, Hilton Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 15  13 topical panels,

CUC Oct 2013 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 15 Peer Review  June 2013, Hilton Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 15  13 topical panels,
AST Portfolio Review Tom Statler, NSF/AST AAAC Meeting 13 Oct 2011.

AST Portfolio Review Tom Statler, NSF/AST AAAC Meeting 13 Oct 2011.
1 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Astrophysics Division FY2008 Budget February 8, 2007 Rick Howard Astrophysics Division Director (acting)

1 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Astrophysics Division FY2008 Budget February 8, 2007 Rick Howard Astrophysics Division Director (acting)
19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: 21-23 June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.

19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.
Fundamental Physics at NASA Quantum to Cosmos 3 Airlie, VA 7 July 2008 Michael Salamon NASA HQ/Astrophysics Div.

Fundamental Physics at NASA Quantum to Cosmos 3 Airlie, VA 7 July 2008 Michael Salamon NASA HQ/Astrophysics Div.
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec 15 2009  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.

Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec 15 2008  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.

Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.

1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 15-16 Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.

Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
1 Universities Space Research Association SOFIA Program Options SSSC 18 February 2010 Mina Cappuccio SOFIA Science Project Manager NASA Ames Research Center.

1 Universities Space Research Association SOFIA Program Options SSSC 18 February 2010 Mina Cappuccio SOFIA Science Project Manager NASA Ames Research Center.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.

Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Educator Ambassadors 2008 Sonoma State University July 28 – August 1.

Educator Ambassadors 2008 Sonoma State University July 28 – August 1.
The Universe in the Infrared What is the Spitzer Space Telescope, and how does it work? Funded by NASA’s Spitzer Science Center Images courtesy NASA/JPL.

The Universe in the Infrared What is the Spitzer Space Telescope, and how does it work? Funded by NASA’s Spitzer Science Center Images courtesy NASA/JPL.
1 Universities Space Research Association AAS January 7, 2008 Early Science Workshop Range of E&PO Office Responsibilities Public Affairs (Public Information,

1 Universities Space Research Association AAS January 7, 2008 Early Science Workshop Range of E&PO Office Responsibilities Public Affairs (Public Information,
Mars Program Update James L. Green Acting Director, Mars Exploration Program NASA Headquarters May 13, 2014 NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has.

Mars Program Update James L. Green Acting Director, Mars Exploration Program NASA Headquarters May 13, 2014 NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has.
Workshop Purpose Paul Hertz April 25, 2012. 2 The Importance of Astronomy Science Centers NASA Astronomy Science Centers provide functions for the community:

Workshop Purpose Paul Hertz April 25, The Importance of Astronomy Science Centers NASA Astronomy Science Centers provide functions for the community:
Space Exploration- Tools

Space Exploration- Tools
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations

Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Activities of and Prospective Issues before the Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics Report by David Spergel, CAA Co-Chair Disclaimer: These slides.

Activities of and Prospective Issues before the Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics Report by David Spergel, CAA Co-Chair Disclaimer: These slides.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google