1. Florida Department of Transportation District One Interstate Planning for I-4 and I-75 October 30, 2012

2. Purpose  Define Deficiencies on the Interstate Mainline –Capacity needs between 2012 and 2050 if no improvements were made  Determine Years in which Interstate Mainline Widening is Needed  Provide Recommendations for Managed Lanes Study Limits in D1  Determine feasibility of replacing bridge structures 1

3. Traffic Methodology – Growth Rate Development  Available FDOT Traffic Data –FTI DVD  Recent and Current Studies –Central Polk Parkway IJR, I-75 SIMR, I-75/SR 951 IMR, I- 75/Everglades IJR  Cost Feasible Models –CPP IJR, SR 951 IMR –Lee-Collier, Sarasota-Manatee-Charlotte  Population Growth and Projections Reviewed –Census Data from 2000 and 2010 –BEBR Medium Projections 2010 to 2035  Recommended Growth Rate Selected I-4 Growth Rate = 2.0%I-4 Growth Rate = 2.0% I-75 Growth Rate = 2.5%I-75 Growth Rate = 2.5% 2

4. Traffic Methodology – Capacity Analysis  Geometry and Functional Classification of Mainline Segments was Reviewed  LOS Standard Applied Segment by Segment –Rural Interstate – LOS C –Urban Interstate – LOS D  FDOT Generalized Tables used to Determine Capacity Thresholds –6 lane –8 lane  Recommended Growth Rate Applied to 2011 AADTs 3

5. I-4 Future Capacity Assessment 4

6. Results – County Line Road to US 98/SR 35 5 NA: This segment currently has 8 lanes (6 lanes plus 1 auxiliary lane in each direction) 6 Lanes

7. Results – US 98/SR 35 to Polk Pkwy West 6 LOS D Urban

8. Results – Polk Pkwy West to Champion’s Gate Blvd 7 6 Lanes

9. Conclusions – Phase 1: US 27 to Champions Gate Blvd 8  8 Laning: This segment currently exceeds the 6- lane LOS C threshold  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes in 2021 6 Lanes LOS C Rural

10. Conclusions – Phase 2: County Line Rd to Polk Pkwy West 9  8 Laning: This segment is currently 8 lanes.  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes in 2029 LOS D Urban

11. Conclusions – Phase 2: Polk Pkwy East to US 27 10  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2017 and 2021 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2017 and 2021  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2032 and 2036 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2032 and 2036 6 Lanes

12. Conclusions – Phase 3: Polk Pkwy West to N. Socrum Loop Rd 11  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2025 and 2030 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2025 and 2030  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2039 and 2045 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2039 and 2045 6 Lanes

13. Conclusions – Phase 4: N. Socrum Loop Rd to Polk Pkwy East 12  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2035 and 2036 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2035 and 2036  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2050 and 2051 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2050 and 2051 LOS D Urban

14. Summary – I-4 Capacity Analysis 13 Phasing - 8 Lanes Widening Phasing - 10 Lanes Widening  8 Lanes provide acceptable LOS for 15 years  Managed Lanes Feasibility can be examined up to Polk Pkwy East

15. I-75 Future Capacity Assessment 14

16. Conclusions – Phase 1: US 301 to US 41 15  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2012 and 2020 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2012 and 2020  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2023 and 2031 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2023 and 2031

17. Conclusions – Phase 2: I-275 to US 301 16  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes in 2026 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes in 2026  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes in 2038 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes in 2038 LOS D Urban 6 Lanes

18. Conclusions – Phase 2: US 41 to N River Rd 17  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2021 and 2027 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2021 and 2027  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2033 and 2039 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2033 and 2039 Requires 6 laning in 2012

19. Conclusions – Phase 3: North of Moccasin Wallow Rd to I-275 18  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes in 2034 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes in 2034  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2045 and 2050 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2045 and 2050 NA: This segment currently has 8 lanes (6 lanes plus 1 auxiliary lane in each direction) LOS D Urban

20. Conclusions – Phase 3: N River Rd to Choctaw Blvd 19  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2033 and 2036 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2033 and 2036  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2044 and 2048 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2044 and 2048 LOS C Rural

21. Conclusions – Phase 3: SR 80 to Pine Ridge Rd 20  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2026 and 2035 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2026 and 2035  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2037 and 2047 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2037 and 2047

22. Conclusions – Phase 4: Choctaw Blvd to SR 80 21  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2037 and 2048 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2037 and 2048  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2048 and 2059 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes between 2048 and 2059

23. Conclusions – Phase 5: Pine Ridge Rd to SR 29 22  8 Laning: This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2040 and 2077 This segment requires widening to 8 lanes between 2040 and 2077  10 Laning: This segment requires widening to 10 lanes beyond 2051 This segment requires widening to 10 lanes beyond 2051 LOS D Urban 6 Lanes

24. Summary – I-75 Capacity Analysis 23 Phasing - 8 Lanes Widening Phasing - 10 Lanes Widening

25. Summary Contd.  8 Lanes provide acceptable LOS for 11 to 12 years  Managed Lanes Feasibility can be extended to –US 301 to US 41/SR 681 –US 41/SR 681 to N. River Rd 24