Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosamund Henry Modified over 9 years ago
1
Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 4: Categories,concepts, and meanings, pt. 1
2
4.1 Introduction Functions of conceptual categories: –Facilitate learning over non-identical events –Planning requires generalization across individuals –Communication cannot contain all detail –Economy of knowledge storage and retrieval
3
4.1 Introduction Ways to look at categories: –As collections of entities, with central prototypes and peripheral members –How the members of one category differ from those of another category –Level of categorization
4
4.2 The classical model of category structure Classical categories –are defined by necessary and sufficient features –have clear, rigid boundaries –have no internal structure
5
4.2 The classical model of category structure Q: What are the problems with classical categories?
6
4.2 The classical model of category structure Q: What are the problems with classical categories? A: –many everyday concepts cannot be defined in terms of necessary and sufficient features –category membership is often scalar, not absolute –the boundaries of categories are often “fuzzy”
7
4.3 The prototype model of category structure There is an alternative to the classical model that avoids its drawbacks….
8
4.3.1 Graded centrality It is easy for people to rate the GOE (goodness-of-example) of certain items in relation to a category, and this correlates with frequency, order of mention/learning, family resemblance, verification speed, and priming top-scorer for VEGETABLElow-scorer for VEGETABLE
9
4.3.2 The representation of conceptual categories There are two ways to look at categories: –As a list of properties/features, which are not necessary or sufficient, but which characterize the prototype, which is an idealization of the category –As an organization in terms of similarity to an idealized member [These are very similar approaches and do not have to be distinguished.]
10
4.3.3 Levels of categorization The basic level category has properties more salient than either the superordinate or subordinate levels…
11
4.3.3.1 Basic level categories Q: What is special about basic level categories (car, apple, dog, knife, table)?
12
4.3.3.1 Basic level categories Q: What is special about basic level categories (car, apple, dog, knife, table)? A: –Most inclusive level with characteristic patterns of behavioral interaction, for which a clear visual image can be formed, at which part-whole information is represented –Level used for everyday neutral reference –Level most rapidly accessed in categorization
14
4.3.3.2 Superordinate level categories Q: What do we know about superordinate level categories (vehicle, fruit, furniture)?
15
4.3.3.2 Superordinate level categories Q: What do we know about superordinate level categories (vehicle, fruit, furniture)? A: –within-category resemblance is relatively low –fewer defining attributes –one attribute tends to connect basic-level to superordinate-level categories –superordinate categories are often named with mass nouns and tend to be morphologically complex, whereas basic-level categories are named with count nouns that are morphologically simpler
16
4.3.3.3 Subordinate level categories Q: What do we know about subordinate level categories (hatchback, Granny Smith, card table)?
17
4.3.3.3 Subordinate level categories Q: What do we know about subordinate level categories (hatchback, Granny Smith, card table)? A: –less distinct from neighboring categories –not more informative than basic-level –frequently morphologically complex
19
4.3.4 Shortcomings of prototype theory Simplistic nature of feature list – cannot account for interaction of factors Odd number paradox – people will score GOE even if there is a necc&suff criterion (1, 3, 5 are “better examples” of odd number than 135 or 10,975…) Where do features come from? Why are some categories mutually exclusive? Boundaries – where are they and how do they behave?
20
4.3.5 The frame-based account of prototype effects Frames, ICMs can guide us toward a better understanding of the structure of cognitive categories.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.