1. Chronology and Rates of Migratory Movements, Migration Corridors and Habitats Used, and Breeding and Wintering Area Affiliations of Female Lesser Scaup Stopping-over on Pool 19 of the Mississippi River in Spring Some Preliminary Results from a Pilot Study A Multi-Partner Research Project Photo by Fred Greenslade

2. STUDY PARTNERS: Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Joint Venture Prairie Pothole Joint Venture U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources USGS-Louisiana Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Louisiana State University Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries University of Illinois College of Veterinary Medicine USGS-Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Iowa Department of Natural Resources Illinois Department of Natural Resources Ducks Unlimited Inc. North Dakota Game and Fish Department Long Point Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Fund Kibbe Research Station of Western Illinois University Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Missouri Department of Conservation Des Moines County Conservation Board Louisa County Conservation Board Tri Oak Foods Mississippi Valley Calling Association

3. Major Hypotheses for Scaup Population Decline: Decreased quality and quantity of food resources on winter and spring migration areas (H1) Accumulation of contaminants (H2) Climate and habitat changes on boreal forest breeding areas (H3)

4. Hypotheses for Scaup Population Decline: All 3 major hypotheses may be directly or indirectly affecting female survival or recruitment Hunting probably has not been a factor in the population decline, given low harvest rates and a recent band analysis that found no relationship between harvest rates and annual survival probabilities since the 1950s (Nicolai et al. 2006) H1 has been formalized as the Spring Condition Hypothesis and is a focus of this Pilot Study

5. This Pilot Study: Is a follow up to previous research of scaup on Pool 19 (by Mike Anteau and Al Afton at LSU). They previously color-marked scaup on Pool 19 in 2004 (spray paint) and 2005 (nasal saddles), but obtained too few re-sightings of marked birds to answer research questions of interest Thus, satellite radios were tested in a sample of females in spring 2007

6. Objective 1: Document migration corridors and affiliations to breeding and wintering areas of females stopping-over on Pool 19 during spring - To help identify and prioritize regions and areas for habitat conservation and management - To provide new information concerning the links and importance of Pool 19 to females utilizing various breeding and wintering areas in North America

7. Objective 2: Document migration chronology and estimate rate of movement (km/day) and flight distances (km) from Pool 19 to individual breeding sites - Further test the Spring Condition Hypothesis as a potential cause of the scaup population decline - Determine relative importance of stopover areas in the Upper-Midwest for accumulation of nutrient reserves used for breeding

8. Objective 3: Identify specific lakes and large wetlands used by migrating females after departure from Pool 19 -To allow subsequent quantitative analyses of habitat use across a large landscape - To provide guidance to managers for acquisition, protection, and management of important migration habitats in the Upper- Midwest

9. Objective 4: Band a large sample (>2000) of lesser scaup -To support and encourage subsequent annual operational bandings on Pool 19 - To provide opportunity for direct estimates of harvest rate and survival using new band analysis techniques (Nicolai et al. 2006)

10. Funnel opening below water level Dive-in Capture Methods: We used dive-in traps developed by IL DNR personnel

11. Capture Methods: Traps were checked/emptied 2 to 3 times a day –Mid morning –Afternoon –Just before dark

12. Bird Handling: Scaup were placed in holding pens

13. Bird Handling: Leg Banded

14. Bird Handling: Body mass was recorded

15. Implantation of PTTs Surgeries by Dr. Mark Mitchell, U of IL

16. Preliminary Results

17. Banding We banded, weighed, and released 2482 Lesser Scaup in March 2007 309 females and 2173 males

18. Recaptures We recaptured and released 6 male lesser scaup that were banded and nasal-saddled on Pool 19 in March 2005 We recaptured and released 196 lesser scaup that had been banded during this pilot study No foreign recaptures

19. 17 Females Implanted with PTTs 14 females subsequently migrated from Pool 19 2 females died on Pool 19 (3 and 27 days after release) 1 female’s PTT failed on Pool 19

20. 14 Females Migrated from Pool 19 12 (86%) took a northwesterly overland tract 2 (14%) took a northerly tract 11 females arrived on breeding sites 3 females died in migration (40, 45 and 52 days after release) 3 females died after arrival on breeding sites (78, 82 and 163 days after release) 2 females’ PTTs failed after arrival on breeding sites 6 females remain alive for monitoring during fall migration

21. 14 Females Migrated from Pool 19 Migration Parameter MeanMinMax Departure Date 22 April10 April5 May Days spent on Pool 19 25.61340

22. 11 Females Arrived on Breeding Sites Migration Parameter MeanMinMax Arrival date25 May13 May9 June No. of Stops6.2211 Total distance (km) 3018.518604345 Days in route34.12451 Movement rate (km/day) 89.368.6112.0

23. Bluebill Tracker on DU Website: http://www.ducks.org/scaupstudy