1. TEACHERS’ COMMITMENT AND STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH 2 nd International Conference on Digital Policy and Management Bangkok, Thailand January 21-24, 2015

2.  Introduction

3. “When teachers are committed to their job and organization they will strive toward the improvement of the school and improving school means guiding the students to greater heights of academic achievement.” - Ponnusamy, 2010

4. Teachers’ Commitment Students’ Performance in English Commitment to JobCommitment to Organization Writing Listening Speaking

5. This study sought answers to the following questions:  What is the English teachers’ level of commitment to job and organization?  What is the students’ level of achievement in English in terms of their scores in writing, listening and speaking?  Does the teachers’ level of commitment to job and organization affect the students’ performance in English?

6.  Commitment to job and commitment to organization do not predict students’ performance in writing.  Commitment to job and commitment to organization do not predict students’ performance in listening.  Commitment to job and commitment to organization do not predict students’ performance in speaking. For this study the following null hypotheses were formulated:

7.  Methods and Techniques

8. Methods and Techniques  The descriptive survey research was used  Survey questionnaires were used for data gathering  Sample size: 15 English teachers 420 Students  Descriptive statistics was used to interpret the results  Regression analysis was used to determine how teachers’ commitment affect students’ perfor- mance

9.  Results and Discussions

10. Teachers’ CommitmentWeighted Mean Interpretation Commitment to Job4.00Committed Commitment to Organization3.80Committed Table 1 Teachers’ Commitment to Job and Organization Results and Discussions

11. Test in EnglishMean Standard Deviation Writing7.2541.85 Listening8.431.79 Speaking7.841.74 Results and Discussions Table 2 Students’ Performance in the English Tests

12. VariablesBetaTSig. Commitment to Job-.062-.220.829 Commitment to Organization-.179-.633.538 R Square =.36 F =.225 Sig of F =.802 Results and Discussions Table 3 Regression analysis of teachers’ commitment on students’ performance in writing

13. VariablesBetaTSig. Commitment to Job.4311.670.121 Commitment to Organization.117.432.660 R Square =.200 F = 1.496 Sig of F =.263 Results and Discussions Table 4 Regression analysis of teachers’ commitment on students’ performance in listening

14. VariablesBetaTSig. Commitment to Job-.532-2.274.042 Commitment to Organization-.247.311 R Square =.344 F = 3.143 Sig of F =.080 Results and Discussions Table 5 Regression analysis of teachers’ commitment on students’ performance in speaking

15.  Conclusion

16. Conclusion Commitment to organization is not a predictor of students’ performance in writing, listening and speaking.

17. Conclusion Commitment to job is not a predictor of students’ performance in writing and speaking. Commitment to job is a predictor of students’ performance in listening.