1. 11.04.2012 Congestion Management by distribution FEBEG POSITION Meeting FEBEG-VREG (11.04.2012)

2. CONNECTION PROCEDURE Agreement General terms and conditions Specific terms and conditions In case of withdrawal connection request In case of timely realization of connection In case of untimely realization of connection In case of untimely realization grid reinforcements … Possible compensation depending on phase of realization Payment Compensation Congestion management … 11.04.2012

3. FIRM CAPACITY FOR INJECTION Flexible connection is unacceptable –lack of incentives for grid investments –discourages investments in generation capacity –discriminatory competition distortion –additional uncertainty and missed revenues for power generator NMA1: ‘flexible connections are discriminatory because they make a distinction between existing and new connections’ If grid infrastructure is not sufficient to guarantee firm connection capacity: market based congestion management as temporary solution pending urgent grid investments 11.04.2012 1 NMA decision of the 20th of May, 2009 (102690/87)

4. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT (1) Market based system Objective criteria to measure/predict actual/future congestion proactive investment program Structural congestion is unacceptable Occasional congestion: –should also be prevented by timely investments –market based congestion management can offer temporary solution Market based congestion management system with fair compensation ensures: –grid operators can assess whether they compensate grid users to ramp up/down or invest in grid reinforcements –a correct price which reflects scarcity or oversupply of flexibility –a fair compensation incentivizes market operators to invest in flexible generation capacity or flexible demand 11.04.2012

5. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT (2) Preferred option System redispatch with up- and downward regulation can be implemented according to the Dutch Model: –clear identification of congested zones on the grid –voluntary and, if necessary, mandatory bidding –applicable on all grid users (both generators and end users), including already connected parties no discrimination –biddings for different categories of units to prioritize renewables and cogeneration –fair and market based compensation –net cost of congestion management system is socialized in grid fee 11.04.2012

6. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT (3) At least a fair compensation Mandatory disconnection or ramping down of generation units can only be temporarily accepted provided that all direct and indirect costs are compensated for, including : –imbalance –loss of certificates –CO 2 -obligations –effect on ancillary services If no fair compensation for disconnection or ramping down of generations units: –investments both in grid and generation will be blocked or discouraged –unbalanced social responsibilities (cost and risk shifts towards generators) –distorting competition between generating facilities 11.04.2012

7. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT (4) Technical code Revision technical code is pending New provisions for congestion management: ‘Artikel IV.4.2.1, §3’ and ‘Afdeling IV.5.3’ Proposed provisions need to be amended: –Firm injection capacity –No discriminatory connection and access conditions, including between new and existing contracts –Market based mechanism for congestion management –Fair compensation for disconnection or ramping down –… 11.04.2012

8. CONCLUSIONS Grid capacity for injection needs to be firm Structural congestion must be avoided by timely investments Occasional congestion should also be prevented by grid reinforcements or managed with a market based congestion management system with fair compensation Market based mechanism for congestion management should be included in “Technisch Reglement Distributie Elektriciteit, Afdeling IV.5.3 Congestiebeheer”. 11.04.2012

9. 9 FEBEG 14.10.2011

10. INTEGRATING NEW POWER PLANTS IN THE GRID Power generation development Connection Procedure Grid development Strategy Project planning TYND Development Phase Orienting studyDetailed studyEngineering Realization Connection Specs, Licensing, RFI, RFP, … Engineering BuildFirst Firing Investment planning … Engineering Permitting Grid reinforcements Investment decision Connection Agreement Firm grid capacity available Consultation Request Commitment for firm capacity (Congestion Management) Grid reinforcements 14.10.2011

11. CONNECTION PROCURE Capacity reservation TSO should treat all applications for grid connection on a transparent and non-discriminatory manner At the moment of its investment decision (financial closing) the applicant needs firm commitment that grid capacity will be firmly available at the commissioning date Objective is to avoid grid capacity hoarding for non realistic projects and reduce interdependencies and administrative overhead for Elia and applicant: –frequent in between checks based on permitting status or confirmations of requests should be avoided –ad hoc intervention of Minister in individual procedures is not appropriate 14.10.2011

12. CONNECTION PROCEDURE Principles Connection procedure should be transparent and efficient and based on non-discriminatory criteria: –objective criteria to assess request for connection –informative orienting study –formal request for detailed study (leading to connection options, including conditions, timing and costs) –formal & mutual acceptance of one option –signing of the connection agreement –start realization according to planning and payment scheme Signing of the connection agreement: –firmly allocates the capacity to the applicant –fixes all terms and conditions between applicant and grid operator, including arrangements if grid operator is unable to timely realize grid connection (reinforcement) or if power plant project is delayed or definitely stopped 14.10.2011

13. DEROGATIONS Derogations of these principles should be avoided: –except for system security reasons –existing derogations such as mutually agreed upon grid access constraints for specific connections during a limited number of hours for the maintenance of grid components, should not be considered as a precedent 14.10.2011