Download presentation
Published byEdward Henry Modified over 9 years ago
1
Rutgers Ocean Modeling Group ROMS 4DVar data assimilation Mid-Atlantic Bight and Gulf of Maine John Wilkin with Julia Levin, Javier Zavala-Garay, Hernan Arango, Eli Hunter, David Robertson, Naomi Fleming MARACOOS Modeling Meeting Washington DC July 22-23, 2013
2
Present ESPRESSO real-time system
New DOPPIO real-time system (with 2-way nesting)
3
Work flow for real-time ESPreSSO ROMS 4DVar
Analysis interval is 00:00 – 24:00 UTC Input pre-processing starts 01:00 EST Input preprocessing completes approximately 05:00 EST 4DVAR analysis completes approx 08:00 EST 24-hour analysis is followed by 72-hour forecast using NCEP NAM 0Z cycle from NOMADS GDS at 02:30 UT (10:30 pm EST) Forecast complete and transferred to THREDDS by 09:00 EST Effective forecast is ~ 60 hours ESPreSSO We overlap analysis cycles, performing a new analysis and new forecast every day *Experimental System for Predicting Shelf and Slope Optics
4
Work flow for real-time ESPreSSO ROMS 4DVar
Data used [… real-time SOURCE] 72-hour forecast NAM-WRF 0Z cycle at 2 am EST [NCEP NOMADS] RU regional CODAR product – hourly: 4-hour latency delay [RU TDS] RU glider T,S when available (seldom) (~ 1 hour delay) [RU TDS] USGS daily average flow available 11:00 EST [USGS waterdata] AVHRR IR passes 6-8 per day (~ 2 hour delay) [MARACOOS TDS] REMSS MW-IR blended SST daily average [PO-DAAC] HYCOM NCODA 7-day forecast updated daily [NRL] Jason-2 along-track SLA (4 to 16 hour delay for OGDR) [RADS] SOOP XBT/CTD, Argo floats, NDBC buoys on GTS [OSMC ERDDAP]
5
Work flow for real-time ESPreSSO ROMS 4DVar
Input pre-processing RU CODAR de-tided (harmonic analysis) and binned to 5 km “re-tided” with ESPReSSO harmonics variance within bin & OI combiner expected u_err (GDOP) used for QC RU glider T,S averaged to ~5 km horizontal and 5 m vertical bins GTS SOOP XBT and Argo – binned and QC AVHRR IR individual passes 6-8 per day U. Del cloud mask selected QC flags; bin to 5 km resolution Jason-2 along-track 1 Hz with coastal corrections in RADS MDT from 4DVAR on “mean model” (climatology 3D T,S, uCODAR, τwind) USGS daily river flow is scaled to account for un-gauged watershed
6
The data …
7
Sub-surface T/S analysis and forecast skill
In situ T and S observations are not assimilated so offer independent skill assessment There is a sizeable archive of observatory data from CTD, gliders and XBTs for 2006 (SW06) and 2007 days since 01-Jan-2006
8
Temperature Forward model Forward model after bias removal
Analysis/forecast skill with respect to subsurface OBS that are NOT assimilated Temperature Forward model Forward model after bias removal Data assimilation analysis/hindcast 2-day forecast 4-day forecast
9
Multi-model skill comparison: T/S
CRMS (normalized) BIAS (normalized) MARACOOS AUGV and NMFS EcoMon CTD data in 2010 and 2011
10
Multi-model skill comparison: velocity
11
Bias removal Mean Dynamic Topography
4D-Var applied to climatology of T/S, mean surface fluxes, & mean velocity obs (CODAR, moorings, vessel ADCP)
13
Summary Rutgers ROMS 4DVAR uses all available data from a modern coastal ocean observing system satellites, HF-radar, moorings, AUV (glider, Argo …), XBT/CTD; IR SST individual passes work best – model dynamics create the composite more and diverse data is better climatology assimilation: removes OBC and MDT bias; unbiased background state in Tangent-Linear model gives correct dynamic modes and adjoint-based increments Useful skill for real-time applications 4 days for temperature and salinity; 1-2 days for velocity improves short-term ecosystem prediction observing system operation … glider path planning Variational methods for observing system design adjoint sensitivity and representer-based observing system design (see W. Zhang et al. papers in Ocean Modelling, 2010); observation impact analysis (see A. Moore et al. papers in Prog. Oceanog. 2011)
14
Future DOPPIO model domain configuration for MAB + Gulf of Maine
Same 4DVAR methodology as ESPRESSO Evaluate GOOS/GODAE and IOOS-NB products for real-time OBC Nest in Curchitser group NWA 50-year simulations for reanalysis OBC Repeat climatology 4DVAR for MDT and OBC bias removal Include waves in forcing data and model physics Local shelf and estuarine nests (2-way ROMS) USECOS nitrogen/carbon cycle simulations ROMS 4DVAR weak constraint/dual space formulation observation space – computationally smaller than model space W4DVAR Indirect Representer algorithm (Egbert 1994) W4DPSAS Physical Space Statistical Analysis System (Da Silva 1995) Adjusts time-varying forcing and boundary conditions, explicitly acknowledges model error, enables posterior analysis of observation impact/sensitivity (and more)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.