Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCody Lindsey Modified over 9 years ago
1
Consistent probabilistic outputs for protein function prediction William Stafford Noble Department of Genome Sciences Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington
2
Outline Motivation and background Methods –Shared base method –Reconciliation methods Results
3
The problem Given: protein sequence, knockout phenotype, gene expression profile, protein-protein interactions, and phylogenetic profile Predict a probability for every term in the Gene Ontology Heterogeneous data Missing data Multiple labels per gene Structured output
4
Consistent predictions Cytoplasmic membrane-bound vesicle (GO:0016023) Cytoplasmic vesicle (GO:0031410) is a The probability that protein X is a cytoplasmic membrane-bound vesicle must be less than or equal to the probability that protein X is a cytoplasmic vesicle.
5
Data sets
7
Kernels
8
SVM → Naïve Bayes Data 1 Data 2 Data 3 Data 4 Data 5 Data 6 Data 7 Data 8 Data 33 SVM/AL 1 SVM/AL 2 SVM/AL 3 SVM/AL 4 SVM/AL 5 SVM/AL 6 SVM/AL 7 SVM/AL 8 SVM/AL 33 Product, plus Bayes’ rule Probability 1 Probability 2 Probability 3 Probability 4 Probability 6 Probability 8 Probability 33 Probability Gaussian Asymmetric Laplace
9
SVM → logistic regression Data 1 Data 2 Data 3 Data 4 Data 5 Data 6 Data 7 Data 8 Data 33 SVM 1 SVM 2 SVM 3 SVM 4 SVM 5 SVM 6 SVM 7 SVM 8 SVM 33 Logistic regressor 1 Logistic regressor 2 Logistic regressor 3 Logistic regressor 11 Predict 1 Predict 2 Predict 3 Predict 4 Predict 6 Predict 8 Predict 33 Probability
10
Reconciliation Methods 3 heuristic methods 3 Bayesian networks 1 cascaded logistic regression 3 projection methods
11
Heuristic methods Max: Report the maximum probability of self and all descendants. And: Report the product of probabilities of all ancestors and self. Or: Compute the probability that at least one descendant of the GO term is “on,” assuming independence. All three methods use probabilities estimated by logistic regression.
12
Bayesian network Belief propagation on a graphical model with the topology of the GO. Given Y i, the distribution of each SVM output X i is modeled as an independent asymmetric Laplace distribution. Solved using a variational inference algorithm. “Flipped” variant: reverse the directionality of edges in the graph.
13
Cascaded logistic regression Fit a logistic regression to the SVM output only for those proteins that belong to all parent terms. Models the conditional distribution of the term, given all parents. The final probability is the product of these conditionals:
14
Isotonic regression Consider the squared Euclidean distance between two sets of probabilities. Find the closest set of probabilities to the logistic regression values that satisfy all the inequality constraints.
15
Isotonic regression Consider the squared Euclidean distance between two sets of probabilities. Find the closest set of probabilities to the logistic regression values that satisfy all the inequality constraints.
16
Küllback-Leibler projection Küllback-Leibler projection on the set of distributions which factorize according to the ontology graph. Two variants, depending on the directions of the edges.
17
Likelihood ratios obtained from logistic regression Hybrid method Replace the Bayesian log posterior for Y i by the marginal log posterior obtained from the logistic regression. Uses discriminative posteriors from logistic regression, but still uses a structural prior. BPAL KLP BPLR
18
Axes of evaluation Ontology –biological process –cellular compartment –molecular function Term size –3-10 proteins –11-30 proteins –31-100 proteins –100-200 proteins Evaluation mode –Joint evaluation –Per protein –Per term Recall –1% –10% –50% –80%
19
Legend Belief propagation, asymmetric Laplace Belief propagation, asymmetric Laplace, flipped Belief propagation, logistic regression Cascaded logistic regression Isotonic regression Logistic regression Küllback-Leibler projection Küllback-Leibler projection, flipped Naïve Bayes, asymmetric Laplace
20
Precision TP/(TP+FP) Recall TP / (TP+FN) Joint evaluation Biological process ontology Large terms (101-200)
21
Biological process ontology
22
Molecular function ontology
23
Cellular compartment ontology
24
Conclusions: Joint evaluation Reconciliation does not always help. Isotonic regression performs well overall, especially for recall > 20%. For lower recall values, both Küllback- Leibler projection methods work well.
25
Average precision per protein Biological process All term sizes
26
Biological process
27
Statistical significance Biological process Large terms
28
Biological process Large terms
29
Biological process 101-200 31-100 11-30 3-10 953 proteins 435 proteins 239 proteins 100 proteins
30
Molecular function 101-200 31-100 11-30 3-10 476 proteins 142 proteins 111 proteins 35 proteins
31
Cellular component 101-200 31-100 11-30 3-10 196 proteins 135 proteins 171 proteins 278 proteins
32
Conclusions: per protein Several methods perform well –Unreconciled logistic regression –Unreconciled naïve Bayes –Isotonic regression –Belief propagation with asymmetric Laplace For small terms –For molecular function and biological process, we do not observe many significant differences. –For cellular components, belief propagation with logistic regression works well.
33
Average precision per term Biological process All term sizes
34
Biological process 101-200 31-100 11-30 3-10 953 terms 435 terms 239 terms 100 terms
35
Molecular function 101-200 31-100 11-30 3-10 476 terms 142 terms 111 terms 35 terms
36
Cellular component 101-200 31-100 11-30 3-10 152 terms 97 terms 48 terms 30 terms
37
Conclusions Reconciliation does not always help. Isotonic regression (IR) performs well overall. For small biological process and molecular function terms, it is less clear that IR is one of the best methods.
38
Acknowledgments Guillaume Obozinski Charles Grant Gert Lanckriet Michael Jordan The mousefunc organizers Tim Hughes Lourdes Pena-Castillo Fritz Roth Gabriel Berriz Frank Gibbons
39
Per term for small terms Biological process Molecular function Cellular component
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.