Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byThomas Johnathan Lang Modified over 9 years ago
1
Outcome of diabetic pregnancy Comparison of North East England with Norway December 2000 Gillian Hawthorne
2
Dr Hawthorne u Consultant Diabetologist based at Newcastle Diabetes Centre, Newcastle-upon-Tyne u Interested in diabetic pregnancy since 1990 u Studied with David Hadden, Belfast and Lois Jovanovic, New York
3
St Vincent’s declaration u Achieve pregnancy outcome in the diabetic woman that approximates that of the non diabetic woman
4
England and the North East
5
Norway Bergen Medical birth registry
6
Northern Diabetic Pregnancy Survey u Prospective population based survey u Perinatal mortality for diabetic pregnancy 48/1000 compared to background of 8.9/1000 u Congenital malformation rate for diabetic pregnancy 83/1000 compared to 21.3/1000
7
Diabetic Pregnancy outcome for the UK per 1000 Diabetes BackgroundDiabetesBackground Merseyside 1990-94 Northern Ireland 36.1 37 7.6 N/A 9.7% 5% Perinatal Mortality Birth Defect
8
Perinatal Deaths in Norway 1987-1996 u Perinatal deaths in diabetic pregnancy »11.8 per 1000 u Perinatal deaths in non-diabetic pregnancy »6.7 per 1000 u Perinatal deaths = stillbirth at 28 completed weeks or neonatal death <7th day of life
9
Aim of study u To determine if the difference in diabetic pregnancy outcome between Norway and North East England can be explained by procedural differences: u Are there differences in recording data? u Are the differences in recorded outcome real?
10
Methods u All data collected prospectively between 1st July 1994 and 30th June 1997 u In Norway compulsory notification of all pregnancies with gestational age of 16 completed weeks or more u In north East England notification of all diabetic pregnancy to Northern Diabetic pregnancy Survey
11
Standardisation of definitions u Stillbirths defined as all fetal deaths more than 24 completed weeks u Perinatal mortality all stillbirths >24 completed weeks and all live births u Congenital anomalies coded using ICD 8
12
u Terminations for birth defects included in both numerators and denominators u Relative risks approximated by odds ratio
13
Perinatal Mortality in North East England Total Number Perinatal Deaths Perinatal mortality /1000 With diabetes 3041342.8 Without diabetes 101516101410.0 Relative risk 4.4[2.5-7.7]
14
Perinatal mortality in Norway Total Number Perinatal Deaths Perinatal mortality /1000 With diabetes 20192110.4 Without diabetes 1797541785426.7 Relative risk 1.5 CI [0.97-2.3]
15
Birth Defects in North East England Total Number Birth Defects Birth Defects /1000 Babies of: Mothers with diabetes 3091755.0 Mothers without diabetes 101755247224.3 Relative risk 2.5 CI [1.5-4.0]
16
Birth defects in Norway Birth defects in Norway Total Number Birth Defects Birth Defects /1000 Babies of: Mothers with diabetes 20195828.7 Mothers without diabetes 179754546530.4 Relative risk 0.95 CI [0.73-1.2]
17
Summary u In North East England - –The perinatal mortality for offspring of mothers with diabetes was 42.8/1000 - a 4 fold increase in risk compared to offspring of mothers without diabetes –The risk of birth defects was 2.5 fold increased
18
Summary u In Norway –Perinatal mortality was 10.4/1000 for offspring of mothers with diabetes- 1.5 fold increase compared to offspring of mothers without diabetes –Risk of birth defects for offspring of mothers with diabetes was 0.95
19
Relative risks between North East England and Norway u The differences were significant [p=0.0002] for the relative risk of perinatal mortality adjusted for maternal age u The differences were significant [p=0.0008] for relative risks for birth defect adjusted for maternal age
20
Conclusion u In Norway the outcome of diabetic pregnancy is similar to that of the background population u Diabetic pregnancy remains high risk in North East England u Further research is required to understand what is the cause of this difference
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.