Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Emergency Ultrasound in Trauma

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Emergency Ultrasound in Trauma"— Presentation transcript:

1 Emergency Ultrasound in Trauma
Anthony J Weekes MD, RDMS Janet G. Alteveer, MD Sarah Stahmer, MD

2 Clinical Case GR is a 62 y male who hit his right torso when he slipped on an icy sidewalk. He denies head trauma, and can walk without a limp. Two hours later the pain in his lower chest has increased he comes to the ED.

3 Clinical Case PE: BP116/72, pulse109, RR 24.
There is a minor abrasion to right lateral chest, which is tender to palpation. Diffuse mild abdominal tenderness. Meds: Coumadin for irregular heartbeat

4 Clinical Case 2 large IV’s placed, CXR done. Blood tests sent.
Bedside ultrasound done. CXR revealed lower rib fractures, no HTX or PTX

5 Clinical Case FFP ordered and OR notified.
He is found to have a liver laceration and 500 cc of blood in the peritoneal cavity.

6 Diagnostic Modalities in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage (DPL) CAT Scan Ultrasound (FAST exam)

7 Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage
Advantages Very sensitive for identifying intra-peritoneal blood 106 RBC/mm3 approx. 20 ml blood in 1L lavage fluid Can be done at the bedside Can be done in minutes Disadvantages Overly sensitive, may result in too high a laparotomy rate Invasive Difficult in pregnancy, or with many prior surgeries Can not be repeated

8 CT Scan Advantages Disadvantages Identifies specific injuries
Good for hollow viscus and retroperitoneal injury High sensitivity and specificity Disadvantages Expensive equipment 30-60 minutes to complete study Only for stable patients Not for pregnant patients

9 Focused Abdominal Sonography in Trauma
FAST

10 FAST Advantages Disadvantages
Can be performed in 5 minutes at the bedside Non-invasive Repeat exams Sensitivity and specificity for free fluid equal to DPL and CT Disadvantages Operator dependent May not identify specific injury Poor for hollow viscus or retroperitoneal injury Obesity, subcutaneous air may interfere with exam

11 FAST Principles Detects free intraperitoneal fluid
Blood/fluid pools in dependent areas Pelvis Most dependent Hepatorenal fossa Most dependent area in supramesocolic region

12 FAST Principles Pelvis and Supra-mesocolic areas communicate
Phrenicolic ligament prevents flow Liver/spleen injury Represents 2/3 of cases of blunt abdominal trauma

13 FAST- principles Intraperitoneal fluid may be Blood
Preexisting ascites Urine Intestinal contents

14 FAST – limitations US relatively insensitive for detecting traumatic abdominal organ injury Fluid may pool at variable rates Minimum volume for US detection Multiple views at multiple sites Serial exams: repeat exam if there is a change in clinical picture Operator dependent

15 Evidence supporting use of FAST
Multiple studies in USA by EM and trauma surgeons Studies from Europe and Japan Policy statements by specialty organizations

16 Jehle, D., et al, Am J Emerg Med, 1993
Emergency department ultrasound in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. Jehle, D., et al, Am J Emerg Med, 1993 Single view of Morison’s pouch in 44 patients Performed by physicians after 2 weeks training US compared to DPL and laparotomy Sensitivity 81.8% Specificity 93.9%

17 Trauma surgical study A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality of injured patient assessment Rozycki et al. N=358 patients Outcomes used: US detection of hemoperitoneum/pericardial effusion

18 Results 53/358 (15%) patients w/ free fluid on “gold standard”
All patients: Sens 81.5%, spec 99.7% Blunt trauma: Sens 78.6%, spec 100% PPV 98.1%, NPV 96.2% Overall accuracy was 96.5% for detection of hemoperitoneum or pericardium

19 Trauma Study Rozycki G, et al 1998 Surgeon-performed ultrasound for the assessment of truncal injuries. Lessons learned from 1540 patients FAST exam on patients with precordial or transthoracic wounds or blunt abdominal trauma

20 Precordial/Transthor : Sens 100%, Spec 99.3%
Protocol: + Pericardial fluid OR Stable CT +IP fluid Unstable OR Results N= 1540 pts, 80/1540 (5%) with FF Overall: Sens 83.3%, Spec 99.7% PPV 95%, NPV 99% Precordial/Transthor : Sens 100%, Spec 99.3% Hypotensive BAT: Sens 100%, Spec 100%

21 FAST – Specialty Societies
Established clinical role in Europe, Australia, Japan, Israel German Surgical Society requires candidates’ proficiency in ultrasound United States US in ATLS US policies by frontline specialties American College of Surgeons ACEP,SAEM & AAEM

22 FAST Perform during Resuscitation Physical exam Stabilization

23 Equipment Curved array Various “footprints” Variable frequencies
Small footprint for thorax Large for abdomen Variable frequencies 5.0 MHz: thin, child 3.5 MHz: versatile 2.0 MHz: cardiac, large pts

24 Time to Complete Scan Each view: 30-60 seconds
Number of views dependent on clinical question and findings on initial views Total exam time usually < 3-5 minutes 1988 Armenian earthquake 400 trauma US scans in 72 hrs

25 Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (FAST)
Consists of 4 views Subxiphoid Right Upper Quadrant Left Upper Quadrant Pouch of Douglas

26 FAST Increased sensitivity with increased number of views
Will identify pleural effusions Reliably detects as little as cc in the thorax Sensitivity >96%, specificity %

27 Clinical experience with FAST
Intraperitoneal fluid Sensitivity 82-98%, specificity % Morison’s pouch alone 36-82% sensitivity Increased sensitivity with Increasing number of views Trendelenberg Serial examinations Can detect as little as 250cc of free fluid

28 Clinical Experience Solid organ disruption Hollow viscus injury
40% sensitivity for all organs 33-94% for splenic injury Hollow viscus injury Sensitivity 57% Retroperitoneal injury Sensitivity for identification of hemorrhage <60%

29 RUQ Probe at right thoraco-abdominal junction
Liver : large acoustic window Probe marker cephalad Rib interference? Rotate 30° counterclockwise

30 Scan Plane Same image if probe positioned Anterior Mid axillary
Posterior

31 RUQ Image on screen: Liver cephalad Kidney inferiorly
Morison’s Pouch*: space between Glisson’s capsule and Gerota’s fascia * * * *

32 Normal RUQ Image kidney Two toned structure Longitudinally
Transversely Two toned structure Cortex/medulla Renal sinus

33 Appearance of blood Fresh blood Coagulating blood Anechoic (black)
First hypoechoic Later hyperechoic

34 Normal Morison’s Pouch
Free fluid in Morison’s Pouch

35

36

37

38

39

40

41 Peritoneal lavage fluid infused in 100 patients
Branney, S.W. et al: Quantitative sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid J Trauma:1995: 39 Peritoneal lavage fluid infused in 100 patients Simultaneous scan of Morison’s pouch By physicians ( Surgery,EM, Radiology) Blinded to volume and rate of infusion Mean volume of detection: 619cc Sensitivity at 1 liter: 97% 10% physicians detected less than 400cc

42 Volume Assessment by US
Caveat to Branney study: Artificial condition: infused fluid Fluid in Morison’s after pelvis overflow Tiling et al : ml detected by US Collection >0.5cm suggests over 500ml Transvaginal/rectal 15ml of free intraperitoneal fluid

43 Detection of Fluid by Ultrasound
Affected by positioning Location of bleed Rate of bleeding Operator Experience Value of sensitivity of Ultrasound: Detects clinically injuries Non-detection of fluid May indicate self- limited bleeding

44 All Fluid is not Blood Ascites Ruptured Ovarian Cyst Lavage fluid
Urine from ruptured bladder

45 Mimics of Fluid in RUQ Perinephric fat Abdominal inflammation
May be hypoechoic like blood Usually evenly layered along kidney If in doubt, compare to left kidney Abdominal inflammation Widened extra-renal space Echogenicity of kidney becomes more like the liver parenchyma

46 Pitfalls RUQ Scanning too soon before enough blood has accumulated
Not attempting multiple probe placements Not placing the probe cephalad enough to use the acoustic window of the liver Scanning too soon before enough blood has accumulated Not repeating the scan

47 LUQ Probe at left posterior axillary line Near ribs 9 and 10
Angle probe obliquely (avoid ribs)

48 LUQ Scan Plane More difficult
Acoustic window (spleen) is smaller than liver Mild inspiration will optimize image Bowel interference is common

49 LUQ Scan * spleen * * kidney * *Splenorenal fossa – a potential space

50 Normal Spleno-renal view
Free fluid around spleen

51

52

53

54

55

56 To Evaluate the Thorax Move probe Image cephalad longitudinal Liver
Diaphragm Pleural space

57 Hemothorax liver diaphragm fluid

58 Small Pleural Effusion
Large Pleural Effusion

59 240 trauma US study patients 26 had hemothorax ( CT or chest tube)
Ma O John, Mateer J, Trauma Ultrasound Examination Versus Chest Radiography in the Detection of Hemothorax Ann Emerg Med: March 1997 240 trauma US study patients 26 had hemothorax ( CT or chest tube) CXR and US 0 false positive 1 false negative 25 true positive 214 true negative

60 Pelvic View Probe should be placed in the suprapubic position
Either can be transverse or longitudinal Helpful to image before placement of a Foley catheter

61 Pelvis (Long View)

62 Pelvis: Transverse

63 Normal Transverse pelvic
Fluid in pelvis

64 Pelvic View – Sagittal Fluid in front of the bladder
clot bladder Fluid in front of the bladder If bladder is empty or Foley already placed: Trick of trade IV bag on abdomen Scan through bag

65 Blood in the Pelvis

66

67

68 Free fluid in the pelvis

69 FAST Algorithm

70 Ultrasound in the Detection of Injury
From Blunt or Penetrating Thoracic Trauma

71 Penetrating Thoracic Injury
Clinical challenge Where is the penetration? What was the weapon? What was the trajectory? What organ(s) have been injured? Improved outcomes in patients with normal or near-normal vital signs

72 Penetrating Cardiac Trauma
Pericardial effusion May develop suddenly or surreptitiously May exist before clinical signs develop Salvage rates better if detected before hypotension develops

73 Clinical Case QD is 37 year old male brought in by EMS for ingesting entire bottle of unidentified red and white pills. In the ambulance bay he pulls out a knife and stabs himself in the left nipple.

74 Clinical Case Initial BP 116/72, pulse 109 RR 24. IV’s placed.
No JVD, Clear breath sounds, non tender abdomen As CXR is about to be done, pulse increases to 134. Bedside ultrasound is done while cartridge is developed.

75 Clinical Case

76 Clinical Case Patient is taken to the OR
Penetrating cardiac wound is repaired

77 Subcostal View Most practical in trauma setting
Away from airway and neck/chest procedures Also called Sub-Xyphoid view

78 Subcostal View

79 Subcostal View

80 Pericardial Fluid fluid

81

82

83

84

85

86 Occult Penetrating Cardiac Trauma
Observation unreliable Subxiphoid window Invasive 100% sensitive, 92% specific Negative exploration rates (as high as 80%) Ultrasound reliable indicator of even small pericardial effusion

87 Trauma Study The role of ultrasound in patients with possible penetrating cardiac wounds: a prospective multicenter study. Rozycki GS: J Trauma. 1999 Pericardial scans performed in 261 patients Sensitivity 100%, specificity 96.9% PPV: 81% NPV:100% Time interval BUS to OR: /- 5.9 min

88 Avoid Pitfalls Normal echo does not definitively rule out major pericardial injury Repeat echo with  clinical picture Epicardial fat pad may easily be misinterpreted as “clot” Hemothorax may be confused with pericardial effusion

89 Blunt Cardiac Trauma Basic Assessments Advanced Assessments
Pericardial effusion Assess for wall motion abnormality RV: closest to anterior chest wall Most likely to be injured Advanced Assessments Assess thoracic aorta – may need TEE to see all of thoracic aorta Hematoma Intimal flap Abnormal contour Valvular dysfunction or septal rupture

90 Blunt cardiac trauma Injuries difficult to assess by FAST
Valvular incompetence Myocardial rupture Intracardiac thrombosis Ventricular aneurysm Coronary Thrombosis Intra-cardiac Thrombosis

91 “ The most important preoperative objective in the management of the patient with trauma is to ascertain whether or not laparotomy is needed, and not the diagnosis of a specific organ injury”


Download ppt "Emergency Ultrasound in Trauma"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google