1. While waiting for the presentation, please take a few minutes to complete the reflection survey that is at your table…

2. 2

3.  Part 1: Evaluation Context  Part 2: Workshopping the Implementation  Part 3: Feedback and Next Steps

4. Daniel Pinchas AITSL Janet Clinton University of Melbourne

5. Dual purpose: Improvement –Performance and development –Professional learning Career progression –Accreditation – Graduate –Registration – Proficient –Certification – Highly Accomplished and Lead Support Materials

6. WE ARE HERE

7.  Mixed-Methods  Informing policy development = Evidence Based Policy Implementation

8. Phase 1 Build evaluation foundation Establish stakeholder groups and team Lit review & program logic Phase 1 Build evaluation foundation Establish stakeholder groups and team Lit review & program logic Phase 2 National Forum Stakeholder interviews Collect existing documents Phase 2 National Forum Stakeholder interviews Collect existing documents Phase 3 National Survey #1 National online depository Phase 3 National Survey #1 National online depository Phase 4 Case studies Data collection round #2 Phase 4 Case studies Data collection round #2 Phase 5 Stakeholder interviews Final data collection round National Survey #2 Phase 5 Stakeholder interviews Final data collection round National Survey #2 Phase 6 Triangulation of findings Revisit program logic Draw overall conclusion Phase 6 Triangulation of findings Revisit program logic Draw overall conclusion Stage 1- Develop and refine design Stage 2- Collect evidence Stage 3- Finalise and make recommendations

9. ACCREDITATION (GRADUATE) REGISTRATION (PROFICIENT) CERTIFICATION (HA AND LEAD) PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL LEARNING SUPPORT MATERIALS AND RESOURCES STUDENTS TEACHERS AND SCHOOL LEADERS SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES SYSTEMS/SECTORS & AUTHORITIES STATES/ TERRITORIES NATIONAL POLICY

10. The majority of education professionals are aware and have knowledge of the Standards 10

11. 11 Implementation Stakeholder ownership AwarenessAttitudeKnowledgeActivitySustaining behaviour change APST implementation

12. 12 High Low Intention to Implement Positive Attitude Prior Use Knowledge Position Type School leaders reported higher levels of knowledge, attitudes and intentions to use the Standards as compared to teachers.

13. 13 Intention to Implement Positive Attitude Prior Use Knowledge High Low

14. Teachers Self-reflection Lesson planning Professional development needs Collaboration with colleagues 14 School Leaders Discussion with my teachers Building capacity of colleagues School plans for teaching and learning Supporting PD

15. Enablers Leadership support Access to resources Information sharing Standards are seen as a means not an end Sharing effective practices 15 Challenges Compliance-based, top-down approach Misinterpretation of the Standards Difficulty in ensuring and encouraging teachers to engage Geographical disparity

16. Janet Clinton University of Melbourne

17. 17

18. What do you want the implementation to look like in 5 years & how will you get there? What challenges in your context that need to be overcome? What do you want to find out from the Evaluation? Please use the butchers paper in front of you

19. Janet Clinton & Edmund Misson University of Melbourne & AITSL

20. 20

21. Case studies National Survey #2 - 2015

22. aitsl.edu.au