Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCornelius Pope Modified over 9 years ago
1
A Corpus-based Study of Discourse Features in Learners ’ Writing Development Yu-Hua Chen Lancaster University, UK
2
2 Background Ellis (1994: 44) identified four major approaches in describing learner language: the study of learners ’ errors the study of learners ’ errors the study of developmental patterns the study of developmental patterns the study of variability the study of variability the study of pragmatic features the study of pragmatic features
3
3 Background Ellis (1994: 44) identified four major approaches in describing learner language: the study of learners ’ errors the study of learners ’ errors the study of developmental patterns the study of developmental patterns the study of variability the study of variability the study of pragmatic features the study of pragmatic features
4
4 Background Studies on ESL/EFL writing development Studies on ESL/EFL writing development
5
5 Background Generally focusing on fluency, accuracy and complexity Generally focusing on fluency, accuracy and complexity
6
6 Background Studies on ESL/EFL writing development Generally focusing on fluency, accuracy and complexity Generally focusing on fluency, accuracy and complexity Usually based on small-scale data Usually based on small-scale data
7
7 Background Studies on ESL/EFL writing development Generally focusing on fluency, accuracy and complexity Generally focusing on fluency, accuracy and complexity Usually based on small-scale data Usually based on small-scale data Not much attention being paid to the developmental patterns of discourse features Not much attention being paid to the developmental patterns of discourse features
8
8 My Hypothesis In addition to fluency, accuracy and complexity, there are developmental patterns at the textual level of learners ’ written language. In addition to fluency, accuracy and complexity, there are developmental patterns at the textual level of learners ’ written language.
9
9 Previous Findings For example, Kennedy & Thorp (2007) IELTS writers at levels 4/6 use lexico-grammatical markers (e.g. however) more frequently. Level 8 writers rely on them less and appear to be nearer to native speaker use in this respect. IELTS writers at levels 4/6 use lexico-grammatical markers (e.g. however) more frequently. Level 8 writers rely on them less and appear to be nearer to native speaker use in this respect.
10
10 Previous Findings For example, Kennedy & Thorp (2007) IELTS writers at levels 4/6 use lexico-grammatical markers (e.g. however) more frequently. Level 8 writers rely on them less and appear to be nearer to native speaker use in this respect. IELTS writers at levels 4/6 use lexico-grammatical markers (e.g. however) more frequently. Level 8 writers rely on them less and appear to be nearer to native speaker use in this respect. Enumerative markers (firstly, etc) are used twice as much by level 4/6 writers as level 8 writers. Enumerative markers (firstly, etc) are used twice as much by level 4/6 writers as level 8 writers.
11
11 Previous Findings For example, Kennedy & Thorp (2007) Subordinators are used slightly less by level 8 writers than by levels 4/6. Subordinators are used slightly less by level 8 writers than by levels 4/6.
12
12 Previous Findings For example, Kennedy & Thorp (2007) Subordinators are used slightly less by level 8 writers than by levels 4/6. Subordinators are used slightly less by level 8 writers than by levels 4/6. Lower level scripts (4/6) are more categorical and content is less modified by hedging. Expressions of (dis)agreement and opinion tend to be more directly expressed (I agree/disagree/in my opinion etc) at level 4. Lower level scripts (4/6) are more categorical and content is less modified by hedging. Expressions of (dis)agreement and opinion tend to be more directly expressed (I agree/disagree/in my opinion etc) at level 4.
13
13 Provisional Research Focuses Bottom-up Approach Bottom-up Approach Discourse Markers, e.g. however, hence, first, then, etc. Discourse Markers, e.g. however, hence, first, then, etc.
14
14 Provisional Research Focuses Bottom-up Approach Bottom-up Approach Discourse Markers, e.g. however, hence, first, then, etc. Discourse Markers, e.g. however, hence, first, then, etc. Hedging Devices, e.g. modal auxiliaries, modal lexical verbs (seem, appear, suggest, indicate, assume, etc.), modal adjectives (possible), modal adverbials (perhaps) Hedging Devices, e.g. modal auxiliaries, modal lexical verbs (seem, appear, suggest, indicate, assume, etc.), modal adjectives (possible), modal adverbials (perhaps)
15
15 Provisional Research Focuses Bottom-up Approach Bottom-up Approach Discourse Markers, e.g. however, hence, first, then, etc. Discourse Markers, e.g. however, hence, first, then, etc. Hedging Devices, e.g. modal auxiliaries, modal lexical verbs (seem, appear, suggest, indicate, assume, etc.), modal adjectives (possible), modal adverbials (perhaps)) Hedging Devices, e.g. modal auxiliaries, modal lexical verbs (seem, appear, suggest, indicate, assume, etc.), modal adjectives (possible), modal adverbials (perhaps)) Top-down Approach Top-down Approach Lexical bundles: recurrent word combination Lexical bundles: recurrent word combination
16
16 Data The Longman Learner Corpus The Longman Learner Corpus A large collection of documents written by learners of English A large collection of documents written by learners of English Comprising mainly essays and exam scripts from students throughout the world between 1990 and 2002 Comprising mainly essays and exam scripts from students throughout the world between 1990 and 2002
17
17 Data The Longman Learner Corpus The Longman Learner Corpus A large collection of documents written by learners of English A large collection of documents written by learners of English Comprising mainly essays and exam scripts from students throughout the world between 1990 and 2002 Comprising mainly essays and exam scripts from students throughout the world between 1990 and 2002 Only written samples from L1 Chinese learners of L2 English are included in my project. Only written samples from L1 Chinese learners of L2 English are included in my project.
18
18 Data The Longman Learner Corpus The Longman Learner Corpus A large collection of documents written by learners of English A large collection of documents written by learners of English Comprising mainly essays and exam scripts from students throughout the world between 1990 and 2002 Comprising mainly essays and exam scripts from students throughout the world between 1990 and 2002 Only written samples from L1 Chinese learners of L2 English are included in my project. Only written samples from L1 Chinese learners of L2 English are included in my project. Only argumentative/expository essays are selected. Only argumentative/expository essays are selected.
19
19 A LLC Sample 00706 00706 USA USA CHC CHC AD AD INT INT 1 1 Culture shock Culture shock Culture shock occurs as a result of when you are suddently immersion Culture shock occurs as a result of when you are suddently immersion in a new different culture. It's due to your own feeling how to deal in a new different culture. It's due to your own feeling how to deal with the differences in food, clothing, and other things. with the differences in food, clothing, and other things. When I arrived at the L.A airport on Aug 3. The first thing is to When I arrived at the L.A airport on Aug 3. The first thing is to meet the I.N.S. inspector. I found the Americas are very open-minded meet the I.N.S. inspector. I found the Americas are very open-minded and kindness to give me more assistance. They judge everyone just and kindness to give me more assistance. They judge everyone just built in a Truth. If you are honest, it is easy to pass. Then I woked built in a Truth. If you are honest, it is easy to pass. Then I woked out the gate of airport I saw it is marvolous that has so many out the gate of airport I saw it is marvolous that has so many terminals and complex cross-freeway system just a high technology terminals and complex cross-freeway system just a high technology architeture there. architeture there.
20
It is argued that the judgment on learners ’ proficiency should be made based on their linguistic performance, as opposed to ‘ extralinguistic factors ’ such as years of learning English or programme levels. In addition, most learners are not equally competent in terms of reading, listening, speaking, and writing; therefore, it is necessary to rate the LLC scripts if only the written performance is the target to be analysed. The Need to Rate the LLC Scripts
21
21 Rating Scale the written assessment criteria grid in Manual for relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference (p.82) the written assessment criteria grid in Manual for relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference (p.82)
22
22 Rating Scale the written assessment criteria grid in Manual for relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference (p.82) the written assessment criteria grid in Manual for relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference (p.82) Due to the large number of samples needed in this project, a holistic/impressionist rating scale is adopted. Due to the large number of samples needed in this project, a holistic/impressionist rating scale is adopted.
23
23 Expected Project Scale Level Pilot Study Main Investigation No. of samples No. of words No. of samples No. of words C2--20,000--100,000 C1--20,000--100,000 B2--20,000--100,000 B1--20,000--100,000 Total30080,0001,500400,000
24
24 Expected Contributions Collaboration between SLA and Language Testing Collaboration between SLA and Language Testing
25
25 Expected Contributions Collaboration between SLA and Language Testing Collaboration between SLA and Language Testing SLA SLA Shed light on learners ’ language development Shed light on learners ’ language development Provide insights for ELT writing pedagogy Provide insights for ELT writing pedagogy
26
26 Expected Contributions Collaboration between SLA and Language Testing Collaboration between SLA and Language Testing SLA SLA Shed light on learners ’ language development Shed light on learners ’ language development Provide insights for ELT writing pedagogy Provide insights for ELT writing pedagogy Language Testing Language Testing Facilitate the design of a common band scale of writing assessment Facilitate the design of a common band scale of writing assessment Help develop a computer automated marking system Help develop a computer automated marking system
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.