Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJeremy Bates Modified over 9 years ago
1
Experiments with ultracold atomic gases Andrey Turlapov Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences Nizhniy Novgorod
2
Fermions: 6 Li atoms 670 nm 2s 2p Electronic ground state: 1s 2 2s 1 Nuclear spin: I=1 Ground state splitting in high B
3
Optical dipole trap Trapping potential of a focused laser beam: Laser: P = 100 W laser =10.6 m Trap: U ~ 0 – 1 mK The dipole potential is nearly conservative: 1 photon absorbed per 30 min b/c laser =10.6 m >> lithium =0.67 m
4
2-body strong interactions in a dilute gas (3D) At low kinetic energy, only s-wave scattering (l=0). For l=1, the centrifugal barrier ~ 1 mK >> typical energy ~ 1 K L = 10 000 bohr R=10 bohr ~ 0.5 nm s -wave scattering length a is the only interaction parameter (for R<< a ) Physically, only a/L matters
5
Feshbach resonance. BCS-to-BEC crossover 2004006008001000120014001600 0 2500 5000 -5000 -2500 -7500 В, gauss a, bohr Singlet 2-body potential: electron spins ↑↓ Triplet 2-body potential: electron spins ↓↓ BCS s/fluid BEC of Li 2 b/c s-wave scattering amplitude:
6
Superfluid and normal hydrodynamics of a strongly-interacting Fermi gas ( a → ∞) [Duke, Science (2002)] M. Gyulassy: “Elliptic flow is everywhere” Crab nebula Elliptic, accelerated expansion
7
Superfluid and normal hydrodynamics of a strongly-interacting Fermi gas ( a → ∞) [Duke, Science (2002)] T < 0.1 E F Superfluidity ?
8
Superfluidity 1. Bardeen – Cooper – Schreifer hamiltonian on the far Fermi side of the Feshbach resonance 2. Bogolyubov hamiltonian on the far Bose side of the Feshbach resonance
9
High-temperature superfluidity in the unitary limit ( a → ∞) Bardeen – Cooper – Schrieffer: Theories appropriate for strong interactions Levin et al. (Chicago): Burovsky, Prokofiev, Svistunov, Troyer (Amherst, Moscow, Zurich): The Duke group has observed signatures of phase transition in different experiments at T/E F = 0.21 – 0.27
10
High-temperature superfluidity in the unitary limit ( a → ∞) Group of John Thomas [Duke, Science 2002] Superfluidity ? vortices Group of Wolfgang Ketterle [MIT, Nature 2005] Superfluidity !!
11
Breathing mode in a trapped Fermi gas Trap ON again, oscillation for variable Image 1 ms Release time Trap ON Excitation & observation: 300 m [Duke, PRL 2004, 2005]
12
Breathing Mode in a Trapped Fermi Gas 840 G Strongly-interacting Gas ( k F a = 30 ) w = frequency t = damping time Fit:
13
Breathing mode frequency Transverse frequencies of the trap: Trap Prediction for normal collisionless gas: Prediction of universal isentropic hydrodynamics (either s/fluid or normal gas with many collisions): at any T
14
TcTc Frequency vs temperature for strongly-interacting gas (B=840 G) Hydrodynamic frequency, 1.84 at all T/E F !! Collisionless gas frequency, 2.11
15
Damping rate 1/ vs temperature for strongly-interacting gas (B=840 G)
16
Hydrodynamic oscillations. Damping vs T/E F Superfluid hydrodynamics Collisional hydrodynamics of Fermi gas Bigger superfluid fraction. In general, more collisions longer damping. Collisions are Pauli blocked b/c final states are occupied. Oscillations damp faster !! Slower damping
17
Damping rate 1/ vs temperature for strongly-interacting gas (B=840 G)
18
Black curve – modeling by kinetic equation
19
Damping rate 1/ vs temperature for strongly-interacting gas (B=840 G) Phase transition Phase transition
20
Shear viscosity bound Kovtun, Son, Starinets (PRL, 2005): In a strongly-interacting quantum system s – entropy density Strongly-interacting atomic Fermi gas – fluid with min shear viscosity ?!!
21
Quantum Viscosity? Viscosity: Assumption: Universal isentropic hydrodynamics Calculate viscosity from breathing mode One eq.: normal & s/f component flow together
22
Viscosity / Entropy density for a universal isentropic fluid
23
Viscosity / Entropy density ? String theory limit 1/4 s/f transition 3 He & 4 He near -point Quark-gluon plasma, S. Bass, Duke, priv.
24
Ferromagnetism: An open problems Itinerant ferromagnetism in 2D Normal phase Ferro- magnet E ferro 4 2D at T=0:
25
where N = # of atoms 2D Fermi gas in a harmonic trap – condition of 2D in ideal gas at T=0
26
Open problems 2. Superfluidity in 2D Berezinskii – Kosterlitz – Thouless transition BKT transition not yet observed directly in Fermi systems. Indirect observations in s/c films questioned [Kogan, PRB (2007)] 3. 3-body bound states 2D and quasi-2D analogs of the 3D Efimov states ?
27
How to parameterize a universal Fermi gas ? Temperature (T) or Total energy per particle (E) ? Temperature:
28
Energy measured from the cloud size !! z U Trap potential Force Balance: pressure Local energy density (interaction + kinetic) In a universal Fermi system: [Ho, PRL (2004)] Virial Theorem: Thomas, PRL (2005)
29
Resonant s-wave interactions ( a → ± ∞) Is the mean field ? Energy balance at a → - ∞: Collapse s-wave scattering amplitude: In a Fermi gas k≠0. k~k F. Therefore, at a =∞, ?
30
2 stages of laser cooling 1. Cooling in a magneto-optical trap T final = 150 K Phase-space density ~ 10 -6 2. Cooling in an optical dipole trap T final = 10 nK – 10 K Phase-space density ≈ 1
31
The apparatus
32
1st stage of cooling: Magneto-optical trap
33
m j = –1m j = +1m j = 0 |g>
34
1 st stage of cooling: Magneto-optical trap N ~ 10 9 T ≥ 150 K n ~ 10 11 cm -3 phase space density ~ 10 -6
35
2 nd stage of cooling: Optical dipole trap Trapping potential of a focused laser beam: Laser: P = 100 W laser =10.6 m Trap: U ~ 250 K The dipole potential is nearly conservative: 1 photon absorbed per 30 min b/c laser =10.6 m >> lithium =0.67 m
36
2 nd stage of cooling: Optical dipole trap Evaporative cooling Evaporative cooling: - Turn on collisions by tuning to the Feshbach resonance - Evaporate The Fermi degeneracy is achieved at the cost of loosing 2/3 of atoms. N final = 10 3 – 10 5 atoms, T final = 0.05 E F, T = 10 nK – 1 K, n = 10 11 – 10 14 cm -3
37
Absorption imaging CCD matrix Imaging over few microseconds Laser beam =10.6 m
38
Trapping atoms in anti-nodes of a standing optical wave Laser beam =10.6 m Mirror V(z) z Fermions: Atoms of lithium-6 in spin-states |1> and |2>
39
Absorption imaging CCD matrix Imaging over few microseconds Laser beam =10.6 m Mirror
40
Photograph of 2D systems z, m x, m atoms/ m 2 Each cloud ≈ 700 atoms per spin state Period = 5.3 m T = 0.1 E F = 20 nK Each cloud is an isolated 2D system [N.Novgorod, PRL 2010]
41
Temperature measurement from transverse density profile Linear density, m -1 x, m
42
Temperature measurement from transverse density profile Linear density, m -1 2D Thomas-Fermi profile: T=(0.10 ± 0.03) E F
43
Temperature measurement from transverse density profile Linear density, m -1 Gaussian fit 2D Thomas-Fermi profile: T=(0.10 ± 0.03) E F =20 nK
44
The apparatus (main vacuum chamber)
45
Maksim Kuplyanin, A.T., Tatyana Barmashova, Kirill Martiyanov, Vasiliy Makhalov
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.