Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Experiments with ultracold atomic gases Andrey Turlapov Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences Nizhniy Novgorod.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Experiments with ultracold atomic gases Andrey Turlapov Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences Nizhniy Novgorod."— Presentation transcript:

1 Experiments with ultracold atomic gases Andrey Turlapov Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences Nizhniy Novgorod

2 Fermions: 6 Li atoms 670 nm 2s 2p Electronic ground state: 1s 2 2s 1 Nuclear spin: I=1 Ground state splitting in high B

3 Optical dipole trap Trapping potential of a focused laser beam: Laser: P = 100 W laser =10.6  m Trap: U ~ 0 – 1 mK The dipole potential is nearly conservative: 1 photon absorbed per 30 min b/c laser =10.6  m >> lithium =0.67  m

4 2-body strong interactions in a dilute gas (3D) At low kinetic energy, only s-wave scattering (l=0). For l=1, the centrifugal barrier ~ 1 mK >> typical energy ~ 1  K L = 10 000 bohr R=10 bohr ~ 0.5 nm s -wave scattering length a is the only interaction parameter (for R<< a ) Physically, only a/L matters

5 Feshbach resonance. BCS-to-BEC crossover 2004006008001000120014001600 0 2500 5000 -5000 -2500 -7500 В, gauss a, bohr Singlet 2-body potential: electron spins ↑↓ Triplet 2-body potential: electron spins ↓↓ BCS s/fluid BEC of Li 2 b/c s-wave scattering amplitude:

6 Superfluid and normal hydrodynamics of a strongly-interacting Fermi gas ( a → ∞) [Duke, Science (2002)] M. Gyulassy: “Elliptic flow is everywhere” Crab nebula Elliptic, accelerated expansion

7 Superfluid and normal hydrodynamics of a strongly-interacting Fermi gas ( a → ∞) [Duke, Science (2002)] T < 0.1 E F Superfluidity ?

8 Superfluidity 1. Bardeen – Cooper – Schreifer hamiltonian on the far Fermi side of the Feshbach resonance 2. Bogolyubov hamiltonian on the far Bose side of the Feshbach resonance

9 High-temperature superfluidity in the unitary limit ( a → ∞) Bardeen – Cooper – Schrieffer: Theories appropriate for strong interactions Levin et al. (Chicago): Burovsky, Prokofiev, Svistunov, Troyer (Amherst, Moscow, Zurich): The Duke group has observed signatures of phase transition in different experiments at T/E F = 0.21 – 0.27

10 High-temperature superfluidity in the unitary limit ( a → ∞) Group of John Thomas [Duke, Science 2002] Superfluidity ? vortices Group of Wolfgang Ketterle [MIT, Nature 2005] Superfluidity !!

11 Breathing mode in a trapped Fermi gas Trap ON again, oscillation for variable Image 1 ms Release time Trap ON Excitation & observation: 300  m [Duke, PRL 2004, 2005]

12 Breathing Mode in a Trapped Fermi Gas 840 G Strongly-interacting Gas ( k F a =  30 ) w = frequency t = damping time Fit:

13 Breathing mode frequency  Transverse frequencies of the trap: Trap Prediction for normal collisionless gas: Prediction of universal isentropic hydrodynamics (either s/fluid or normal gas with many collisions): at any T

14 TcTc Frequency  vs temperature for strongly-interacting gas (B=840 G) Hydrodynamic frequency, 1.84 at all T/E F !! Collisionless gas frequency, 2.11

15 Damping rate 1/  vs temperature for strongly-interacting gas (B=840 G)

16 Hydrodynamic oscillations. Damping vs T/E F Superfluid hydrodynamics Collisional hydrodynamics of Fermi gas Bigger superfluid fraction. In general, more collisions longer damping. Collisions are Pauli blocked b/c final states are occupied. Oscillations damp faster !! Slower damping

17 Damping rate 1/  vs temperature for strongly-interacting gas (B=840 G)

18 Black curve – modeling by kinetic equation

19 Damping rate 1/  vs temperature for strongly-interacting gas (B=840 G) Phase transition Phase transition

20 Shear viscosity bound Kovtun, Son, Starinets (PRL, 2005): In a strongly-interacting quantum system s – entropy density Strongly-interacting atomic Fermi gas – fluid with min shear viscosity ?!!

21 Quantum Viscosity? Viscosity: Assumption: Universal isentropic hydrodynamics Calculate viscosity from breathing mode One eq.: normal & s/f component flow together

22 Viscosity / Entropy density for a universal isentropic fluid

23 Viscosity / Entropy density ? String theory limit 1/4  s/f transition 3 He & 4 He near -point Quark-gluon plasma, S. Bass, Duke, priv.

24 Ferromagnetism: An open problems Itinerant ferromagnetism in 2D Normal phase Ferro- magnet E ferro 4  2D at T=0:

25 where N = # of atoms 2D Fermi gas in a harmonic trap – condition of 2D in ideal gas at T=0

26 Open problems 2. Superfluidity in 2D Berezinskii – Kosterlitz – Thouless transition BKT transition not yet observed directly in Fermi systems. Indirect observations in s/c films questioned [Kogan, PRB (2007)] 3. 3-body bound states 2D and quasi-2D analogs of the 3D Efimov states ?

27 How to parameterize a universal Fermi gas ? Temperature (T) or Total energy per particle (E) ? Temperature:

28 Energy measured from the cloud size !! z U Trap potential Force Balance: pressure Local energy density (interaction + kinetic) In a universal Fermi system: [Ho, PRL (2004)] Virial Theorem: Thomas, PRL (2005)

29 Resonant s-wave interactions ( a → ± ∞) Is the mean field ? Energy balance at a → - ∞: Collapse s-wave scattering amplitude: In a Fermi gas k≠0. k~k F. Therefore, at a =∞, ?

30 2 stages of laser cooling 1. Cooling in a magneto-optical trap T final = 150  K Phase-space density ~ 10 -6 2. Cooling in an optical dipole trap T final = 10 nK – 10  K Phase-space density ≈ 1

31 The apparatus

32 1st stage of cooling: Magneto-optical trap

33 m j = –1m j = +1m j = 0 |g>

34 1 st stage of cooling: Magneto-optical trap N ~ 10 9 T ≥ 150  K n ~ 10 11 cm -3 phase space density ~ 10 -6

35 2 nd stage of cooling: Optical dipole trap Trapping potential of a focused laser beam: Laser: P = 100 W laser =10.6  m Trap: U ~ 250  K The dipole potential is nearly conservative: 1 photon absorbed per 30 min b/c laser =10.6  m >> lithium =0.67  m

36 2 nd stage of cooling: Optical dipole trap Evaporative cooling Evaporative cooling: - Turn on collisions by tuning to the Feshbach resonance - Evaporate The Fermi degeneracy is achieved at the cost of loosing 2/3 of atoms. N final = 10 3 – 10 5 atoms, T final = 0.05 E F, T = 10 nK – 1  K, n = 10 11 – 10 14 cm -3

37 Absorption imaging CCD matrix Imaging over few microseconds Laser beam =10.6  m

38 Trapping atoms in anti-nodes of a standing optical wave Laser beam =10.6  m Mirror V(z) z Fermions: Atoms of lithium-6 in spin-states |1> and |2>

39 Absorption imaging CCD matrix Imaging over few microseconds Laser beam =10.6  m Mirror

40 Photograph of 2D systems z,  m x,  m atoms/  m 2 Each cloud ≈ 700 atoms per spin state Period = 5.3  m T = 0.1 E F = 20 nK Each cloud is an isolated 2D system [N.Novgorod, PRL 2010]

41 Temperature measurement from transverse density profile Linear density,  m -1 x,  m

42 Temperature measurement from transverse density profile Linear density,  m -1 2D Thomas-Fermi profile: T=(0.10 ± 0.03) E F

43 Temperature measurement from transverse density profile Linear density,  m -1 Gaussian fit 2D Thomas-Fermi profile: T=(0.10 ± 0.03) E F =20 nK

44 The apparatus (main vacuum chamber)

45 Maksim Kuplyanin, A.T., Tatyana Barmashova, Kirill Martiyanov, Vasiliy Makhalov


Download ppt "Experiments with ultracold atomic gases Andrey Turlapov Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences Nizhniy Novgorod."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google