Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLynette Franklin Modified over 9 years ago
1
Compressive Signal Processing Richard Baraniuk Rice University
2
Better, Stronger, Faster
3
Sense by Sampling sample
Example: Large Hadron Collider will produce 10 peta bytes of data per second; need to triage that down to 100/sec “potentially interesting events” in real time
4
Sense by Sampling too sample much data!
Example: Large Hadron Collider will produce 10 peta bytes of data per second; need to triage that down to 100/sec “potentially interesting events” in real time
5
Accelerating Data Deluge
1250 billion gigabytes generated in 2010 # digital bits > # stars in the universe growing by a factor of 10 every 5 years Total data generated > total storage Increases in generation rate >> increases in comm rate Available transmission bandwidth
7
Sense then Compress sample compress JPEG JPEG2000 … decompress
8
Sparsity large wavelet coefficients (blue = 0) pixels
9
Sparsity large wavelet coefficients pixels wideband signal samples
(blue = 0) pixels wideband signal samples large Gabor (TF) coefficients frequency time
10
Concise Signal Structure
Sparse signal: only K out of N coordinates nonzero sparse signal nonzero entries sorted index
11
Concise Signal Structure
Sparse signal: only K out of N coordinates nonzero model: union of K-dimensional subspaces aligned w/ coordinate axes sparse signal nonzero entries sorted index
12
Concise Signal Structure
Sparse signal: only K out of N coordinates nonzero model: union of K-dimensional subspaces Compressible signal: sorted coordinates decay rapidly with power-law approximately sparse power-law decay sorted index
13
Concise Signal Structure
Sparse signal: only K out of N coordinates nonzero model: union of K-dimensional subspaces Compressible signal: sorted coordinates decay rapidly with power-law model: ball: power-law decay sorted index
14
What’s Wrong with this Picture?
Why go to all the work to acquire N samples only to discard all but K pieces of data? sample compress decompress
15
What’s Wrong with this Picture?
linear processing linear signal model (bandlimited subspace) nonlinear processing nonlinear signal model (union of subspaces) sample compress decompress
16
Compressive Sensing Directly acquire “compressed” data via dimensionality reduction Replace samples by more general “measurements” compressive sensing recover
17
Sampling Signal is -sparse in basis/dictionary
WLOG assume sparse in space domain sparse signal nonzero entries
18
Sampling Signal is -sparse in basis/dictionary Sampling
WLOG assume sparse in space domain Sampling sparse signal measurements nonzero entries
19
Compressive Sampling When data is sparse/compressible, can directly acquire a condensed representation with no/little information loss through linear dimensionality reduction sparse signal measurements nonzero entries
20
How Can It Work? Projection not full rank… … and so loses information in general Ex: Infinitely many ’s map to the same (null space)
21
How Can It Work? Projection not full rank… … and so loses information in general But we are only interested in sparse vectors columns
22
How Can It Work? Projection not full rank… … and so loses information in general But we are only interested in sparse vectors is effectively MxK columns
23
How Can It Work? Projection not full rank… … and so loses information in general But we are only interested in sparse vectors Design so that each of its MxK submatrices are full rank (ideally close to orthobasis) Restricted Isometry Property (RIP) see also phase transition approach of Donoho et al. columns
24
RIP = Stable Embedding An information preserving projection preserves the geometry of the set of sparse signals RIP ensures that K-dim subspaces 24
25
RIP = Stable Embedding An information preserving projection preserves the geometry of the set of sparse signals RIP ensures that 25
26
How Can It Work? Projection not full rank… … and so loses information in general Design so that each of its MxK submatrices are full rank (RIP) Unfortunately, a combinatorial, NP-Hard design problem columns
27
Insight from the 70’s [Kashin, Gluskin]
Draw at random iid Gaussian iid Bernoulli … Then has the RIP with high probability provided columns
28
Randomized Sensing Measurements = random linear combinations of the entries of No information loss for sparse vectors whp sparse signal measurements nonzero entries
29
CS Signal Recovery Goal: Recover signal from measurements
Problem: Random projection not full rank (ill-posed inverse problem) Solution: Exploit the sparse/compressible geometry of acquired signal
30
CS Signal Recovery Random projection not full rank
Recovery problem: given find Null space Search in null space for the “best” according to some criterion ex: least squares (N-M)-dim hyperplane at random angle
31
Signal Recovery Recovery: given (ill-posed inverse problem) find (sparse) Optimization: Closed-form solution:
32
Signal Recovery Recovery: given (ill-posed inverse problem) find (sparse) Optimization: Closed-form solution: Wrong answer! 32
33
Signal Recovery Recovery: given (ill-posed inverse problem) find (sparse) Optimization: Closed-form solution: Wrong answer! 33
34
Signal Recovery Recovery: given (ill-posed inverse problem) find (sparse) Optimization: “find sparsest vector in translated nullspace” 34
35
Signal Recovery Recovery: given (ill-posed inverse problem) find (sparse) Optimization: Correct! “find sparsest vector in translated nullspace” 35
36
Signal Recovery Recovery: given (ill-posed inverse problem) find (sparse) Optimization: Correct! But NP-Complete alg “find sparsest vector in translated nullspace” 36
37
Signal Recovery Recovery: given (ill-posed inverse problem) find (sparse) Optimization: Convexify the optimization Donoho Candes Romberg Tao 37
38
Signal Recovery Recovery: given (ill-posed inverse problem) find (sparse) Optimization: Convexify the optimization Correct! Polynomial time alg (linear programming) Much recent alg progress greedy, Bayesian approaches, … 38
39
CS Hallmarks Stable Asymmetrical (most processing at decoder)
acquisition/recovery process is numerically stable Asymmetrical (most processing at decoder) conventional: smart encoder, dumb decoder CS: dumb encoder, smart decoder Democratic each measurement carries the same amount of information robust to measurement loss and quantization “digital fountain” property Random measurements encrypted Universal same random projections / hardware can be used for any sparse signal class (generic) 39
40
Universality Random measurements can be used for signals sparse in any basis
41
Universality Random measurements can be used for signals sparse in any basis
42
Universality Random measurements can be used for signals sparse in any basis sparse coefficient vector nonzero entries
43
Compressive Sensing In Action
44
“Single-Pixel” CS Camera
scene single photon detector image reconstruction or processing DMD DMD random pattern on DMD array DMD is used in projectors Multiply value of random pattern in mirror with value of signal (light intensity) in pixel lens is focused onto the photodiode w/ Kevin Kelly
45
“Single-Pixel” CS Camera
scene single photon detector image reconstruction or processing DMD DMD random pattern on DMD array DMD is used in projectors Multiply value of random pattern in mirror with value of signal (light intensity) in pixel lens is focused onto the photodiode … Flip mirror array M times to acquire M measurements Sparsity-based (linear programming) recovery
46
First Image Acquisition
target pixels 11000 measurements (16%) 1300 measurements (2%)
47
single photon detector
Utility? Fairchild 100Mpixel CCD single photon detector DMD is used in projectors Multiply value of random pattern in mirror with value of signal (light intensity) in pixel lens is focused onto the photodiode DMD DMD
48
SWIR CS Camera Target (illuminated in SWIR only) Camera output
InView “single-pixel” SWIR Camera (1024x768) Target (illuminated in SWIR only) Camera output M = 0.5 N
49
CS Hyperspectral Imager
(Kevin Kelly Lab, Rice U) spectrometer hyperspectral data cube nm N=1M space x wavelength voxels M=200k random measurements
50
CS-MUVI for Video CS Pendulum speed: 2 sec/cycle
Naïve, block-based L1 recovery of 64x64 video frames for 3 different values of W 1024 2048 4096
51
Recovered video (animated)
CS-MUVI for Video CS Effective “compression ratio” = 60:1 Low-res preview (32x32) High-res video recovery (128x128) Recovered video (animated)
52
Analog-to-Digital Conversion
Nyquist rate limits reach of today’s ADCs “Moore’s Law” for ADCs: technology Figure of Merit incorporating sampling rate and dynamic range doubles every 6-8 years Analog-to-Information (A2I) converter wideband signals have high Nyquist rate but are often sparse/compressible develop new ADC technologies to exploit new tradeoffs among Nyquist rate, sampling rate, dynamic range, … frequency hopper spectrogram frequency time
53
Random Demodulator
54
Sampling Rate Goal: Sample near signal’s (low) “information rate” rather than its (high) Nyquist rate A2I sampling rate number of tones / window Nyquist bandwidth
55
Example: Frequency Hopper
20x sub-Nyquist sampling Nyquist rate sampling spectrogram sparsogram
56
Example: Frequency Hopper
20x sub-Nyquist sampling Nyquist rate sampling spectrogram sparsogram conventional ADC CS-based AIC 20MHz sampling rate 1MHz sampling rate
57
More CS In Action CS makes sense when measurements are expensive
Coded imagers x-ray, gamma-ray, IR, THz, … Camera networks sensing/compression/fusion Array processing exploit spatial sparsity of targets Ultrawideband A/D converters exploit sparsity in frequency domain Medical imaging MRI, CT, ultrasound …
58
Pros and Cons of Compressive Sensing
59
CS – Pro – Measurement Noise
Stable recovery with additive measurement noise Noise is added to Stability: noise only mildly amplified in recovered signal
60
CS – Con – Signal Noise Often seek recovery with additive signal noise
Noise is added to Noise folding: signal noise amplified in by dB for every doubling of Same effect seen in classical “bandpass subsampling”
61
CS – Con – Noise Folding slope = -3 CS recovered signal SNR
62
CS – Pro – Dynamic Range As amount of subsampling grows, can employ an ADC with a lower sampling rate and hence higher-resolution quantizer
63
Dynamic Range Corollary: CS can significantly boost the ENOB of an ADC system for sparse signals CS ADC w/ sparsity conventional ADC
64
CS – Pro – Dynamic Range As amount of subsampling grows, can employ an ADC with a lower sampling rate and hence higher-resolution quantizer Thus dynamic range of CS ADC can far exceed Nyquist ADC With current ADC trends, dynamic range gain is theoretically 7.9dB for each doubling in
65
CS – Pro – Dynamic Range slope = +5 (almost 7.9) dynamic range
66
CS – Pro vs. Con SNR: 3dB loss for each doubling of
Dynamic Range: up to 7.9dB gain for each doubling of
67
Summary: CS Compressive sensing
randomized dimensionality reduction exploits signal sparsity information integrates sensing, compression, processing Why it works: with high probability, random projections preserve information in signals with concise geometric structures Enables new sensing architectures cameras, imaging systems, ADCs, radios, arrays, … Important to understand noise-folding/dynamic range trade space
68
Open Research Issues Links with information theory
new encoding matrix design via codes (LDPC, fountains) new decoding algorithms (BP, AMP, etc.) quantization and rate distortion theory Links with machine learning Johnson-Lindenstrauss, manifold embedding, RIP Processing/inference on random projections filtering, tracking, interference cancellation, … Multi-signal CS array processing, localization, sensor networks, … CS hardware ADCs, receivers, cameras, imagers, arrays, radars, sonars, … 1-bit CS and stable embeddings
69
dsp.rice.edu/cs
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.