Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A 107 dB DR, 106dB SNDR Sigma-Delta ADC Using a

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A 107 dB DR, 106dB SNDR Sigma-Delta ADC Using a"— Presentation transcript:

1 A 107 dB DR, 106dB SNDR Sigma-Delta ADC Using a
Charge-Pump Integrator for Audio Application The final year project presentation The graduation thesis plea of XXX University Student No.: Sam, (DB028791); Hubert, (DB029125) Supervisor:Prof. Sin-Weng Sai Co-Supervisor:Prof. U Seng Pan

2 CON TENTS 1. Introduction 2. Basic theory of Sigma-Delta ADC
3. Target specification 4. Architecture Chosen 5. Charge Pump Integrator 6. Behavioral Model 7. Circuit Partial Design 8. Conclusion

3 01 Introduction

4 Audio in life 1 A/D converter 2 Audio standard 3 Introduction

5 1 2 3 ADC Introduction Audio in life A/D converter Audio standard
Analog Digital Signal: Continuous signal which represents physical measurements. Discrete time signals generated by digital modulation. Example: Human voice in air, analog electronic devices. Computers, CDs, DVDs, and other digital electronic devices.

6 1 2 3 ADC Introduction Audio in life A/D converter Audio standard
Increase the quality, reduce the noise and Cumulative distortion. Save energy, use converter instead of the amplifier in transmission. Information safety, Given the timing information, the transmitted waveform can be reconstructed

7 1 2 3 Introduction Audio in life A/D converter Audio standard
People’s hearing range Frequency range: 20~20k Hz Sound Pressure Level(SPL) = 𝐿 𝑃 =20 log 𝑃 𝑟𝑚𝑠 𝑃 𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑑𝐵 ; 𝑃 𝑟𝑒𝑓 =2𝑢𝑝𝑎 human ear's audible sounds is from 0 dB SPL (hearing threshold) to 140 dB SPL (pain threshold) 

8 1 2 3 Introduction 44.1 KHz 16bit about 96dB dynamic range
Audio in life 1 A/D converter 2 Audio standard 3 Introduction Compact Disc Digital Audio (CDDA or CD-DA) is the standard format for audio Compact Discs. The standard is defined in the Red Book 44.1 KHz 16bit about 96dB dynamic range symphony orchestra 110dB SPL Library 30 dB SPL 110 dB - 30 dB = only 80 dB real dynamic range if you brought the orchestra into your home Good enough for listeners !

9 ? 1 2 3 Introduction Audio in life A/D converter Audio standard
An professional requires more during mixing and mastering. Multiplying that noise by a few thousand times eventually becomes noticeable. Keep the accumulated noise at a very low level ! 16 bit enough? Going from a whisper to a scream requires a large dynamic range. When we create and produce music we can use the dynamic range to aid musical expression. We can have gently plucked guitars and booming techno bass lines all in one song. undetectable during playback Modern work flows may involve literally thousands of effects and operations. Once the music is ready to distribute, there's no reason to keep more than 16 bits.

10 Basic theory of Sigma-Delta ADC
02 Basic theory of Sigma-Delta ADC

11 1 2 Basic theory High resolution Low bandwidth Different ADC
Key features 2 Basic theory High resolution Low bandwidth

12 1 2 Basic theory Different ADC Key features
Signal to noise ratio for Nyquist ADC 𝑆𝑁𝑅| 𝑑𝐵 =10𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝑃 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑃 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 where Psign and Pnoise are the power of the signal and the power of the noise in the band of interest. Sine wave as example: 𝑃 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒 = 1 𝑇 0 𝑇 𝑋 𝐹𝑆 𝑠𝑖𝑛 2 2𝜋𝑓𝑡 𝑑𝑡≈ 1 𝑇 0 𝑇 𝑋 𝐹𝑆 𝜋𝑓𝑡 2 𝑑𝑡 = (∆∙ 2 𝑛 ) 2 8 𝑃 𝑄 = ∆ 2 12 ∴𝑆𝑁𝑅 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒 | 𝑑𝐵 = 6.02∙𝑛+1.78 𝑑𝐵 Every bit of quantizer improves the SNR by 6.02 dB!!!

13 1 2 Basic theory Oversampling (OSR) Noise shaping (Order)
Different ADC 1 Key features 2 Basic theory Oversampling (OSR) Noise shaping (Order)

14 03 Target specification

15 Products’ use 1 Our target 2 Target specification

16 1 2 Target specification Products’ use Our target
Audio Sigma-Delta ADC From TI Company NAME SNR Normal products pcm1870 90dB pcm1808 99dB pcm1851a 101dB pcm1803a 103dB From the table, listing some the audio ADCs use in car audio system. The SNR performance is 99dB. Thus We set our target as 105dB SNR, After setting the target, the structure of the ƩΔ ADC will be chosen to build the system.

17 04 Architecture Chosen

18 1 2 Architecture Chosen Architecture Quantizer and OSR
Single Loop Architecture CIFB – Cascade Integrators with Distributed Feedback CIFF – Cascade Integrators with Distributed Feed-forward CRFB – Cascade Resonator with Distributed Feedback CRFF – Cascade Resonator with Distributed Feed-forward

19 1 2 Architecture Chosen CIFB CIFF Architecture Quantizer and OSR
-ai = bi for i ≤ 3 -b4 = 1 NTF CIFF - b1 = b4 = 1

20 1 2 Architecture Chosen CRFB CRFF Architecture Quantizer and OSR
-ai = bi for i ≤ 3 -b4 = 1 NTF CRFF - b1 = b4 = 1 Further increase SNR by optimizing NTF zero

21 1 2 Architecture Chosen Architecture Quantizer and OSR Feedforward
Feedback Only one DAC required Requires many feedback DACs Needs an extra adder No extra adder First integrator is fastest Last integrator is fastest First opamp is power hungry With Resonator Without Resonator Advantage Higher SNDR Simpler Structure Disadvantage More Complex Structure (Resonator) Lower SNDR

22 Architecture Chosen Architecture 1 Quantizer and OSR 2 1.5 Bit Quantizer 01 Higher SNR Ensure linearity OSR=256 Higher SNR Decrease the Thermal Noise 02 05 03 3rd order architecture Higher SNR A single loop 3rd order CRFB Σ-Δ ADC with 1.5 bit quantizer and 256 OSR are designed.

23 Charge Pump Integrator
05 Charge Pump Integrator

24 1 2 Charge Pump Integrator Introduction Conclusion
CRFB architecture using conventional SC integrator CRFB architecture using CP SC integrator

25 1 2 Charge Pump Integrator Conventional Charge-pump Introduction
Conclusion 2 Conventional 𝐶𝑠/𝑘 Φ2 Charge-pump As upper mention, in order to get high resolution system, large OSR and large sampling capacitor are require to reduce the thermal noise which constraints the power consumption of op-amp. Moreover, one of the main constraints of the chosen structure CRFB is the high requirement of first op-amp which requires high DC gain as well as high power consumption. In this project, a special integrator called charge-pump integrator shown in above figure is used to improve the power efficiency. Φ2

26 1 2 Charge Pump Integrator Conventional Charge-pump Introduction
Conclusion 2 Conventional Charge-pump 𝐶𝑠/𝑘 𝑃𝑂𝑊 𝑂𝑃 ∝ 𝑔 𝑚 𝐶 𝐿 = 𝐶 𝑠 𝑘+1 + 𝐶 𝑙 𝐶 𝐿 ′= 𝐶 𝑠 2 𝑘+2 + 𝐶 𝑙 𝑔 𝑚 = 𝜔 −3𝑑𝐵 𝐶 𝐿 𝛽 𝛽= 1 𝑘+1 𝛽′= 2 𝑘+2 As upper mention, in order to get high resolution system, large OSR and large sampling capacitor are require to reduce the thermal noise which constraints the power consumption of op-amp. Moreover, one of the main constraints of the chosen structure CRFB is the high requirement of first op-amp which requires high DC gain as well as high power consumption. In this project, a special integrator called charge-pump integrator shown in above figure is used to improve the power efficiency. 𝐶 𝐿 𝛽 ′ ≈ 𝐶 𝐿 4𝛽 𝐶 𝐿 𝛽 = 𝐶 𝑠 + 𝐶 𝑙 (𝑘+1) ( 𝐶 𝐿 𝛽 )′= 𝐶 𝑠 4 + 𝐶 𝑙 ( 𝑘 2 +1) 𝑔 𝑚 ′ = 𝑔 𝑚 4 𝑃𝑂𝑊 𝑜𝑝 ′ = 𝑃𝑂𝑊 𝑂𝑃 4

27 S W O T 1 2 Charge Pump Integrator STRENGTH WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITY
Introduction 1 Conclusion 2 STRENGTH WEAKNESS Reduce the power consumption of the amplifier Need double supply voltage (two 0.25um transistor) S W O T OPPORTUNITY THREATS Easier to implement by adding capacitor May cause unmatched problem and high requirements to other parts

28 06 Behavioral Model

29 1 2 Behavioral Model The 3rd order CRFB with noise block in Matlab
Ideal Model 1 Model with Non-idealities 2 Behavioral Model The 3rd order CRFB with noise block in Matlab

30 1 2 Behavioral Model The main non-idealities Ideal Model
Model with Non-idealities 2 Behavioral Model The main non-idealities Operational amplifier non-idealities: Bandwidth of Op-amp; Slew rate of Op-amp; Operational amplifier saturation voltages. Thermal noise of Switch Capacitor structure. noise of op-amp. clock jitter at the input sampler.

31 1 2 Behavioral Model DC gain requirement of first op-amp
Ideal Model 1 Model with Non-idealities 2 Behavioral Model DC gain requirement of first op-amp Finite DC gain SNR 80dB 134.8dB 60dB 58dB 132.3dB 54dB 128.1dB 50dB 120.4dB Repeat the operation to obtain behavioral model of the system

32 1 2 Behavioral Model Behavioral Model of The Project Ideal Model
Model with Non-idealities 2 Behavioral Model Behavioral Model of The Project Sigma-delta Parameter SNR (dB) Ideal modulation 134.8 Finite DC gain (A=58dB, 58dB, 50dB) 130.6 Finite bandwidth(GBW=100MHz) Finite Slew-rate (SR=60V/us) Saturation voltages (|Vmax|=1V) Sampling Jitter (Δ𝜏=17𝑝𝑠) 130.7 Switch (kT/C) noise (Cs=10pF) 110.4 Input-referred operational amplifier noise (Vn=1.5uV) 108 Including all of the non-idealities

33 The gain of first Op-amp(dB) simulation result of Cadence(dB)
Ideal Model 1 Model with Non-idealities 2 Behavioral Model In cadence simulation, the first Op-amp gain requirement is 58 dB for 133dB SNR, now change the architecture: The gain of first Op-amp(dB) simulation result of Cadence(dB) 54 133 50 48 46 132 42 130 It is clearly found that the requirement of first Op-amp is reduced

34 Circuit Partial Design
07 Circuit Partial Design

35 1 4 2 3 Circuit Partial Design 1st CMFB Op-amp Design Op-Amp:
Optimization 2 Quantizer 3 Switch 4 Circuit Partial Design Op-amp Design 1st Op-Amp: Main structure Bias Circuit Switched-capacitor CMFB CMFB

36 1 4 2 3 Circuit Partial Design 2nd 3rd Op-amp Design Op-amp
Optimization 2 Quantizer 3 Switch 4 Op-amp Design 2nd 3rd

37 1 2 3 4 Circuit Partial Design Zero Optimization Op-amp Optimization
Quantizer 3 Switch 4 Circuit Partial Design Optimization 2 Zero Optimization For the CRFB structure, it needs a local feedback from third integrator output to second integrator input to make up a resonator which effects the zero. Q 2 = V 𝑜3 𝐶 1 ||( 𝐶 2 + 𝐶 ∙ 𝐶 2 𝐶 3 + 𝐶 2 Q=g∙ V 𝑜3

38 1 4 2 3 Circuit Partial Design 1.5 Bit Quantizer Op-amp Optimization
Switch 4 Circuit Partial Design 1.5 Bit Quantizer

39 1 4 2 3 Circuit Partial Design Op-amp Optimization Quantizer Switch
CMOS switch It is often used very large or small voltage input, under such situation, the transmission resistor will change critically

40 1 4 2 3 Circuit Partial Design Op-amp Optimization Quantizer Switch
Bootstrapped Switch To obtain constant conductance, the bootstrap technique can be used to keep the gate-source voltage at a certain value.

41 08 Conclusion

42 1 2 3 Conclusion System Performance Comparison Summary
107dB Dynamic Range Output PSD for the system Measured SNDR versus input amplitude Technology Sampling Frequency Bandwidth Peak SNDR Power Consumption FOM 65nm CMOS 10.24MHz 20kHz 106dB 1.332mW 204f/conv.

43 1 2 3 32.4% Conclusion System Performance Comparison Summary
Transistor level comparison of system using CP And Conventional CP Conventional Peak SNDR 106dB 102dB Power consumption 1.332mW 1.972mW FOM 204f/conv. 479f/conv. 32.4% Power consumption 32.4% decrease because of first stage It achieves a higher SNDR but cost less power by using CP integrator

44 Comparison with Other Σ-Δ ADC
System Performance 1 Comparison 2 Summary 3 Conclusion Comparison with Other Σ-Δ ADC This work JSSC/06 CICC/11 TCAS-1/13 JSSC/09 JSSC/08 JSSC/03 [1] [2] [5] [4] [3] [6] Tech [um] 0.065 0.13 0.18 0.35 Supply [V] 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.9 2 Input Range [Vpp-diff] 0.4 1.1 / OSR 256 300 64 128 100 154 BW [kHz] 20 24 10 SNDR [dB] 106 95 87.8 81 89 105 Power [uW] 1332 2200 371 148 36 1500 68000 FOM [fJ/conv.] 204 11200 170 369 98 1360 11700

45 1 2 3 Conclusion For audio application => high SNDR (target ≥105dB)
System Performance 1 Comparison 2 Summary 3 Conclusion For audio application => high SNDR (target ≥105dB) Suppress the in-band noise (oversampling and noise shaping) 3rd CRFB Sigma-Delta modulator architecture using CP integrator is selected As a result, with a full-scale input of 900mVpp differential the CRFB ADC using charge-pump integrator achieves 106 dB SNDR and 107dB dynamic range in audio bandwidth (20kHz), while consuming 1.332mW power.

46 Reference Dorrer, L., et al. "A 2.2 mW, continuous-time sigma-delta ADC for voice coding with 95dB dynamic range in a 65nm CMOS process." Solid-State Circuits Conference, ESSCIRC Proceedings of the 32nd European. IEEE, 2006. Liu, L., et al. "A 95dB SNDR audio ΔΣ modulator in 65nm CMOS." Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, 2011. M. G. Kim, G.-C. Ahn, P. Hanumolu, S.-H. Lee, S.-H. Kim, S.-B. You,J.-W. Kim, G. C. Temes, and U.-K. Moon, “A 0.9 V 92 dB double-sampled switched-RC delta-sigma audio ADC,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1195–1206, May 2008. Y. Chae and G. Han, “Low voltage, low power, inverter-based switched-capacitor delta-sigma modulator,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 458–472, Feb Nilchi, Alireza, and David A. Johns. "A low-power delta-sigma modulator using a charge-pump integrator." Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, IEEE Transactions on 60.5 (2013): Yang, YuQing, et al. "A 114-dB 68-mW chopper-stabilized stereo multibit audio ADC in 5.62 mm 2." Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of 38.12 (2003):

47 THANK YOU !


Download ppt "A 107 dB DR, 106dB SNDR Sigma-Delta ADC Using a"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google