1. Why an RE Review? Equity Quality

2. Focus of the RE Review –Aims –Curriculum –Exemplification of good RE practice –Assessment including qualifications

3. Sizing up the challenge Considerable resources within the RE Community Authority of the REC Lack of government support Very limited resources

4. Overview by 4 Phases 1.Identify current strengths & weaknesses of RE related to four foci (led by Expert Panel) 2.Address agenda for change identified by those findings (led by Task Groups) 3.Find best way to communicate findings of Phases One and Two in final report 4.Disseminate Report widely and celebrate!

5. Phase 1 Draft report goes to the …….. Steering Group (Oct 31 st ) and on to the Reference Group (REC EGM Nov 7 th) then on to Wider public consultation (Nov 12 th - Dec 3 rd ) REC Board (Dec 6 th ) Report finalised and approved Jan 2013

6. Phase 2 Brief for task groups agreed by Steering Group and fair/authoritative means of recruiting task group membership identified (28 th Nov) First 2 task groups undertake work (Feb – April 2013); work circulated for wider consultation Second 2 task groups undertake work (May – July 2013); work circulated for wider public consultation

7. Phases 3 & 4 Synthesise the reports from Phases 1 & 2 into a final document Publish the final report and organise a launch/launches at which we lobby policy makers and celebrate our collective achievement

8. Who’s in charge?

9. “We” need to do this WE being: –RE teachers –RE advisers and consultants –RE and TRS/RS university and college lecturers –“Faith” Group representatives and citizens N.B. There is no funding from the government for the RE Review:

10. Every argument a constructive argument!