Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBarnard Clinton Poole Modified over 9 years ago
1
F INDING T HE B EST E VIDENCE : A N O VERVIEW OF THE R ESOURCES S PRING 2010 “…conscientious, explicit and judicious use of the current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients…” -- Sackett, DL
2
T HIS SESSION WILL COVER What do we mean by evidence-based health care Steps in practicing evidence-based care Types of literature Key resources for finding evidence-based information 2
3
EBP! The Patient Clinical Expertise Best Evidence 3 Clinically relevant research, the literature Practitioner’s knowledge & experience Patient’s characteristics & values T HREE P RONGED A PPROACH 3
4
Need for current clinical information Updates info in textbooks, journals, experts Skills/experiences increase over time, current knowledge may decrease Increase in clinical research and literature Conflicting clinical research [at times] Limited time to find and evaluate research 4 W HY USE AN EVIDENCE - BASED APPROACH ?
5
1. Convert need for information into focused clinical question 2. Track down the best evidence 3. Critically appraise the evidence 4. Integrate evidence with clinical expertise and patient values 5. Evaluate the process and adjust as needed 5 S TEPS IN PRACTICING EBP Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM By Straus SE, et al Third Edition. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, 2005 0-443-07444-5, 299 pages. Includes CD-ROM
6
Your patient is a 14-yr old boy with a weight problem (obesity). He has tried lifestyle changes and they have not been effective, so he and his parents ask you about other weight loss options for an adolescent. Photo from CDC: Childhood overweight C LINICAL SCENARIO 6
7
7 Background vs. Foreground questions Background questions – getting up to speed on a topic. General knowledge about a disorder. Look for info in textbooks, summary material. Foreground questions – specific knowledge about managing a patient or disorder. Apply EBP techniques, use EBP resources U SING THE LITERATURE IN PRACTICE 7
8
UpToDate Clinical Evidence MDConsult STAT!Ref MICROMEDEX Specialty texts via Ebling Library website Harrisons 8 B ACKGROUND SOURCES
9
9 9 Medical topics in internal medicine (particularly strong), pediatrics, ob/gyn and family medicine Designed to provide a quick way to get up to speed An updated version of UpToDate is released every four months “What’s New” tab highlight changes with each major release. For use in EBM is a mixed bag (use cautiously to answer clinical questions (i.e. PICO questions) Articles are a mixture of medical conclusions based on data from studies and expert opinions of individual authors…not always clear which statements are evidence-based and which are not E VIDENCE - BASED CLINICAL SUMMARY
10
10 Background vs. Foreground questions Background questions – general knowledge about a disorder. Look for info in Reference sources Foreground questions – specific knowledge about managing a patient or disorder. Apply EBP techniques, use EBP resources In a 14 year old obese male, how effective is the drug Meridia for long term weight loss? U SING THE LITERATURE IN PRACTICE 10
11
P I C O helps to formulate the question P atient/ P opulation/ P roblem I ntervention C omparison O utcome 11 C ONVERT THE CLINICAL QUESTION TO PICO
12
In a 14 year old obese male, how effective is the drug Meridia for long term weight loss? 12 P I O C – no comparison/placebo C ONVERT THE CLINICAL QUESTION TO PICO
13
P = In a 14 yo obese male I = is Meridia C = O = effective and safe for long term weight loss? 13 P obese obesity overweight I Meridia sibutramine C REATING A SEARCH QUERY adolescent adolescence teen teenager youth
14
P = In a 14 yo obese male I = is Meridia 14 P obese obesity overweight I Meridia sibutramine C REATING A SEARCH QUERY adolescent adolescence teen teenager youth ORANGE = MeSH termMeSH term
15
adolescent adolescence teen teenager youth child obese obesity overweight meridia sibutramine 15 Place an “OR” between synonyms of the same concept and surround concept terms with parentheses Place an “AND” between concepts ( OR OR OR OR OR ) ( OR OR ) ( OR ) AND C REATING A SEARCH QUERY 15
16
16 (adolescent OR adolescence OR teen OR teenager OR youth OR child) AND (obesity OR obese OR overweight) AND (meridia OR sibutramine) (adolescen* OR teen* OR youth OR child) AND (obes* OR overweight) AND (meridia OR sibutramine) Use truncation character, if available: C REATING A SEARCH QUERY 16
17
1. Convert need for information into focused clinical question 2. Track down the best evidence 3. Critically appraise the evidence 4. Integrate evidence with clinical expertise and patient values 5. Evaluate the process and adjust as needed 17 S TEPS IN PRACTICING EBP
18
Clinical summaries Meta analyses/Systematic reviews Randomized control trials (RCTs) Prospective cohort studies Case-control (retrospective cohort) studies Case studies Opinion of authorities, editorials 18 Level of Evidence low high E VIDENCE HIERARCHY
19
A compendium of short summaries of the current state of the knowledge (and uncertainty) about clinical conditions (prevention, treatment, and/or diagnosis) Entries are explicitly based on thorough searches and appraisals of the literature and created from the best available evidence from systematic reviews, RCTs and observational studies E VIDENCE - BASED CLINICAL SUMMARY 19
20
Examples: BMJ Clinical Evidence http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ Essential Evidence Plus http://www.essentialevidence.com/ UpToDate http://www.uptodate.com 20 E VIDENCE - BASED CLINICAL SUMMARIES
21
21 Collection of brief reviews focusing on primary care and covering over 3,000 clinical interventions with 570 clinical questions answered. Looks at current state of knowledge & ignorance about prevention and treatment. Describes the best available evidence and if there is no good evidence, it says so. Each review focuses on single condition and is displayed in a tabbed structure: Single page summary of the review Ranked list of interventions with discussion (benefits/harms) Background info on the condition A list of material published since the review search date Links to major guidelines relevant to the review E VIDENCE - BASED CLINICAL SUMMARY
22
Clinical summaries Meta analyses/Systematic reviews Randomized control trials (RCTs) Prospective cohort studies Case-control (retrospective cohort) studies Case studies Opinion of authorities, editorials 22 Level of Evidence low high E VIDENCE HIERARCHY
23
Summarize a particular topic by using explicit methods to perform a thorough literature search and critical appraisal of individual studies to identify the valid and applicable evidence Uses appropriate techniques to combine these valid studies Published in many journals and found in a variety of other electronic sources S YSTEMATIC REVIEWS 23
24
Examples: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews http://www.cochrane.org/ DARE http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/ TRIP Database http://www.tripdatabase.com MEDLINE (PubMed) http://www.pubmed.gov S YSTEMATIC REVIEWS 24
25
25 5,600 systematic reviews and meta-analyses Rigorous, highly-regarded, reviews Focused on therapy/prevention, now covering diagnostic tests Database includes protocols -- plans or sets of steps to be followed in creating a systematic review When searching within the Cochrane Library: use the “Title, Abstract, Keywords” drop down to reduce irrelevant records Contains 15,000 reviews of systematic reviews. Complements the CDSR -- quality-assesses and summarizes reviews that have not yet been carried out by Cochrane When searching within the Cochrane Library: use the “The full review (Search All Text)” drop down to reduce irrelevant records S YSTEMATIC REVIEWS
26
26 Often overlooked secondary source for evidence on any type of foreground question Reviews the best original and review articles from over 100 of the top clinical journals If included, it is important! Unlike DARE, clinical experts provide commentaries on the context, methods, and clinical applications of the findings of each article S YSTEMATIC REVIEWS New interfaceinterface Includes only records/abstracts of journal articles (20 million) Very current info (sometimes pre-pub) Use MeSH terms for more efficient searching Use Boolean operators (AND, OR) Searching for systematic reviews: Use the “Find Systematic Reviews” box in Clinical Queries OR Apply the Subsets limit “Systematic Reviews”
27
1990199520002005 2500 12,500 5000 10,000 7500 # published per year 15,000 2010 27 S YSTEMATIC REVIEWS
28
28 Many conditions, interventions, diagnostic tools without good SRs Need constant maintenance. Half will need to be updated each year Garbage in; garbage out FAAT handout http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1157 http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1157 S YSTEMATIC REVIEWS
29
Clinical summaries Meta analyses/Systematic reviews Randomized control trials (RCTs) Prospective cohort studies Case-control (retrospective cohort) studies Case studies Opinion of authorities, editorials 29 Level of Evidence low high E VIDENCE HIERARCHY Studies
30
Examples: MEDLINE (PubMed) http://www.pubmed.gov Google Scholar http://scholar.google.com Other health databases CINAHL http://www.cinahl.com/ PsycINFO http://www.apa.org/psycinfo/ I NDIVIDUAL STUDIES 30
31
31 Includes only records/abstracts of journal articles (20 million) Very current info (sometimes pre-pub) Use MeSH terms for more efficient searching Use Boolean operators (AND, OR) Searching for single studies: Use the “Search by Clinical Study Category” box in CQ OR use the type of article limit: randomized controlled trials or other appropriate level Subset of larger Google: journal articles, technical reports, preprints, theses, books and other documents and web pages deemed “scholarly” Covers a great range of disciplines (strong in sciences and medicine) It is particularly helpful for users who want: something good enough for the task at hand (not comprehensive) grey literature--sources outside of published journals info from sources across many disciplines Limitations: rudimentary search features, lack of transparency of database content, uneven coverage (time and scope) and a delay in indexing I NDIVIDUAL STUDIES
32
Identify synonyms Check MeSH database via PubMed Use generic and trade names for drugs and tests Use full names along with common abbreviations OR between synonyms Surround OR terms with parentheses Enter concepts as separate sets AND between P, I,C common cold AND (vitamin c OR ascorbic acid) G ENERAL SEARCH HINTS 32
33
1. Converting need for information into focused clinical question 2. Tracking down the best evidence 3. Critically appraising the evidence 4. Integrating evidence with clinical expertise and patient values 5. Evaluating the process S TEPS IN PRACTICING EBP 33
34
Centre for EBM (Toronto) http://www.cebm.utoronto.ca Centre for EBM (Oxford) http://www.cebm.net Users’ Guides series in JAMA http://www.userguides.org 34 C RITICALLY APPRAISING THE EVIDENCE
35
Statistics Toolkit By Perera R, et al BMJ Books 2008 ISBN: 978-1-4051-6142-8 120 pages 35
36
1. Converting need for information into focused clinical question 2. Tracking down the best evidence 3. Critically appraising the evidence 4. Integrating evidence with clinical expertise and patient values 5. Evaluating the process S TEPS IN PRACTICING EBP 36
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.